alexa Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life care in fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer.
Clinical Research

Clinical Research

Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics

Author(s): Smith AK, Earle CC, McCarthy EP

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To examine racial and ethnic variation in use of hospice and high-intensity care in patients with terminal illness. DESIGN: Retrospective, secondary data analysis. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Database from 1992 to 1999 with follow-up data until December 31, 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Forty thousand nine hundred sixty non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Asian, and Hispanic fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older with advanced-stage lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. MEASURMENTS: Hospice use and indicators of high-intensity care at the end of life. RESULTS: Whereas 42.0\% of elderly white patients with advanced cancer enrolled in hospice, enrollment was lower for black (36.9\%), Asian (32.2\%), and Hispanic (37.7\%) patients. Differences between white and Hispanic patients disappeared after adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic factors. Higher proportions of black and Asian patients than of white patients were hospitalized two or more times (11.7\%, 15.0\%, 13.7\%, respectively), spent more than 14 days hospitalized (11.4\%, 17.4\%, 15.6\%, respectively), and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (12.0\%, 17.0\%, 16.2\%, respectively) in the last month of life and died in the hospital (26.5\%, 31.3\%, 33.7\%, respectively). Unadjusted differences in receipt of high-intensity care according to race or ethnicity remained after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Black and Asian patients with advanced cancer were more likely than whites to be hospitalized frequently and for prolonged periods, be admitted to the ICU, die in the hospital, and be enrolled in hospice at lower rates. Further research is needed to examine the degree to which patient preferences or other factors explain these differences.
This article was published in J Am Geriatr Soc and referenced in Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version