alexa Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Anesthesiology

Anesthesiology

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Small randomized trials have demonstrated that radial access reduces access site complications compared to a femoral approach. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine if radial access reduces major bleeding and as a result can reduce death and ischemic events compared to femoral access. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from 1980 to April 2008. Relevant conference abstracts from 2005 to April 2008 were searched. Randomized trials comparing radial versus femoral access coronary angiography or intervention that reported major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction, and procedural or fluoroscopy time were included. A fixed-effects model was used with a random effects for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Radial access reduced major bleeding by 73\% compared to femoral access (0.05\% vs 2.3\%, OR 0.27 [95\% CI 0.16, 0.45], P < .001). There was a trend for reductions in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (2.5\% vs 3.8\%, OR 0.71 [95\% CI 0.49-1.01], P = .058) as well as death (1.2\% vs 1.8\% OR 0.74 [95\% CI 0.42-1.30], P = .29). There was a trend for higher rate of inability to the cross lesion with wire, balloon, or stent during percutaneous coronary intervention with radial access (4.7\% vs 3.4\% OR 1.29 [95\% CI 0.87, 1.94], P = .21). Radial access reduced hospital stay by 0.4 days (95\% CI 0.2-0.5, P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Radial access reduced major bleeding and there was a corresponding trend for reduction in ischemic events compared to femoral access. Large randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of radial access on death and ischemic events. This article was published in Am Heart J and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords