Author(s): Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C
Abstract Share this page
Abstract BACKGROUND: Although rapid response teams (RRTs) increasingly have been adopted by hospitals, their effectiveness in reducing hospital mortality remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of RRTs on reducing cardiopulmonary arrest and hospital mortality rates. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1950, through November 31, 2008, using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, and all Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Randomized clinical trials and prospective studies of RRTs that reported data on changes in the primary outcome of hospital mortality or the secondary outcome of cardiopulmonary arrest cases were included. RESULTS: Eighteen studies from 17 publications (with 1 treated as 2 separate studies) were identified, involving nearly 1.3 million hospital admissions. Implementation of an RRT in adults was associated with a 33.8\% reduction in rates of cardiopulmonary arrest outside the intensive care unit (ICU) (relative risk [RR], 0.66; 95\% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.80) but was not associated with lower hospital mortality rates (RR, 0.96; 95\% CI, 0.84-1.09). In children, implementation of an RRT was associated with a 37.7\% reduction in rates of cardiopulmonary arrest outside the ICU (RR, 0.62; 95\% CI, 0.46-0.84) and a 21.4\% reduction in hospital mortality rates (RR, 0.79; 95\% CI, 0.63-0.98). The pooled mortality estimate in children, however, was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Moreover, studies frequently found evidence that deaths were prevented out of proportion to reductions in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest, raising questions about mechanisms of improvement. CONCLUSION: Although RRTs have broad appeal, robust evidence to support their effectiveness in reducing hospital mortality is lacking.
This article was published in Arch Intern Med
and referenced in Journal of Neonatal Biology