alexa Resolving “Dynamic Interpretation”: An Empirical Analysis of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency
Social & Political Sciences

Social & Political Sciences

Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences

Author(s): Samuel Levander

Abstract Share this page

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) recently adopted Rules on Transparency with the goal of ensuring greater transparency in investor-state dispute resolution. However, the Rules on Transparency presumptively will not apply to any bilateral investment treaties (BITs) that were enacted prior to the Rules’ effective date, unless the parties to the relevant BIT agree otherwise. In drawing up this line of demarcation, UNCITRAL has greatly limited the Rules’ effectiveness and impact-in the vast majority of future cases, the Rules will not apply. UNCITRAL’s analysis has been overly focused on a theoretical analysis of dynamic interpretation and not focused enough on the empirical reality of the BITs to which the Rules on Transparency apply. The Rules on Transparency could easily have been tailored to the language of the dispute resolution clauses of existing BITs. Given the importance of public disclosure as a matter of policy, the Working Group’s decision not to do so is perplexing. This Note analyzes the flaws of the Rules on Transparency in their current form and highlights the benefits of alternative proposals.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in Columbia Journal of Transnational Law and referenced in Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version