alexa Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
Clinical Research

Clinical Research

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Transplantation

Author(s): Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, Canter DJ, Viterbo R,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: The authors systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a pooled analysis of studies on small renal masses who underwent active surveillance to identify the risk progression and the characteristics associated with metastases. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE database was performed to identify all clinical series that reported the surveillance of localized renal masses. For studies that reported individual-level data, clinical and radiographic characteristics of tumors without progression were compared with the characteristics of tumors that progressed to metastases. RESULTS: Eighteen series (880 patients, 936 masses) met screening criteria; and, among these, 18 patients were identified who had tumors that progressed to metastasis (mean, 40.2 months). Six studies (259 patients, 284 masses) provided individual-level data for pooled analysis. At a mean (± standard deviation) follow-up of 33.5 ± 22.6 months, the mean initial greatest tumor dimension was 2.3 ± 1.3 cm, and mean linear growth rate was 0.31 ± 0.38 cm per year. Sixty-five masses (23\%) exhibited zero net growth under surveillance, and none of those masses progressed to metastasis. A pooled analysis revealed increased age (age 75.1 ± 9.1 years vs 66.6 ± 12.3 years; P = .03), an initial greatest tumor dimension (4.1 ± 2.1 cm vs 2.3 ± 1.3 cm; P < .0001), initial estimated tumor volume (66.3 ± 100.0 cm(3) vs 15.1 ± 60.3 cm(3) ; p = .0001), linear growth rate of (0.8 ± 0.65 cm per year vs 0.3 ± 0.4 cm per year; P = .0001), and a volumetric growth rate of 27.1 ± 24.9 cm(3) per year (vs 6.2 ± 27.5 cm(3) per year; P < .0001) in the progression cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of small renal masses remained radiographically static after an initial period of active surveillance. Progression to metastases occurred in a small percentage of patients and generally was a late event. The current results indicated that, in patients who have competing health risks, radiographic surveillance may be an acceptable initial approach, and delayed intervention may be reserved for patients who have tumors that exhibit significant linear or volumetric growth. Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.
This article was published in Cancer and referenced in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Transplantation

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

  • 2nd International Conference on Clinical Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery
    June 29-30, 2017 London, UK
  • 9th Asia Pacific Global Summit on Healthcare
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2nd International Conference on Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery & Medicine
    July 27-28, 2017 Vancouver,Canada

  • 2nd International Conference on Anesthesia and Analgesia
    September 07-08, 2017 London, U.K
  • 21st International Conference on Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
    October 16-18, 2017 Chicago, USA

  • 10th World Congress on Stem Cell and Biobanking
    October 23-24, 2017 Osaka, Japan
  • 9th World Congress on Immunity, Inflammation and Immunotherapies
    November 02-03, 2017 Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • 10th International Conference on Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
    November 21- 23, 2016 Dubai, UAE

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords