alexa Splint for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis: a randomized trial.
Orthopaedics

Orthopaedics

Journal of Arthritis

Author(s): Rannou F, Dimet J, Boutron I, Baron G, Fayad F,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Some guidelines recommend splinting for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis, despite lack of evidence of efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of a splint for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized trial. Randomization was computer-generated, and allocation was concealed by faxing centralized treatment assignment to investigators at the time of enrollment. Patients and investigators were not blinded to assignment, and patients self-reported outcomes. SETTING: 2 tertiary care hospitals in France. PATIENTS: 112 patients (101 women) with base-of-thumb osteoarthritis. INTERVENTION: Custom-made neoprene splint (n = 57) or usual care (n = 55). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in pain level assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (range, 0 to 100 mm) from baseline to 1 month. Secondary outcomes were change in measures of hand disability at 1 month and change in pain level and measures of disability at 12 months. Tolerance and adherence with the splint were recorded. RESULTS: At 1 month, no difference in change occurred in pain level from baseline in the intervention and control groups (adjusted mean change, -10.1 vs. -10.7; between-group difference, 0.6 [95\% CI, -7.9 to 9.1]; P = 0.89). Disability was assessed by the Cochin Hand Function Scale score (range, 0 to 90) or patient-perceived disability (VAS, 0 to 100 mm). At 12 months, change in pain from baseline was greater in the intervention group than in the control group (adjusted mean change, -22.2 vs. -7.9; between-group difference, -14.3 [CI, -23.4 to -5.2]; P = 0.002). The Cochin Hand Function Scale score was -1.9 versus 4.3 (between-group difference, -6.3 [CI, -10.9 to -1.7]; P = 0.008) and patient-perceived disability was -11.6 versus 1.5 (between-group difference, -13.1 [CI, -21.8 to -4.4]; P = 0.003). At 12 months, 86\% of the intervention group had worn the splint for more than 5 nights a week, and no adverse effects were observed. LIMITATION: Patients, health care providers, and outcome assessors were not blinded. CONCLUSION: For patients with base-of-thumb osteoarthritis, wearing a splint had no effect on pain at 1 month but improved pain and disability at 12 months. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00350896.
This article was published in Ann Intern Med and referenced in Journal of Arthritis

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords