alexa Success of simple sequestrectomy in lumbar spine surgery depends on the competence of the fibrous ring: a prospective controlled study of 168 patients.
Neurology

Neurology

Journal of Spine

Author(s): Kast E, Oberle J, Richter HP, Brm W

Abstract Share this page

Abstract STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective nonrandomized study is to evaluate the recurrence rate and the clinical outcome of patients undergoing sole sequestrectomy and compare them with a standard treatment group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While performing microsurgical disc excision, extruded disc fragments and loosened or degenerated parts of the nucleus are removed. It is controversial whether this strategy is always necessary. Within the literature, there is only little information about the results of exclusive sequestrectomy. METHODS: Criteria for performing a sole sequestrectomy were a nonbulging disc and only small or medium perforations within the fibrous ring. According to these criteria, the authors recruited 90 patients for the sequestrectomy group. The control group was operated in standard microsurgical manner during the same time, including 84 patients. A detailed analysis of the actual pain status, the functional capacity (Hannover Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire, FFbH) and eventually additional spinal operations during the follow-up of 2 years was performed. RESULTS: Mean Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH) score at the follow-up was 76\% in the sequestrectomy group and 77.6\% in the control group. This difference is statistically not significant. There were 2 recurrences in the sequestrectomy group at the same level and 1 postoperative instability requiring a fusion procedure. In the control group, there were 2 recurrences and 1 secondary lateral spinal stenosis that led to reoperations. The competence of the fibrous ring influenced significantly the success of a simple sequestrectomy. CONCLUSION: The sole sequestrectomy group revealed similar results compared with the standard microdiscectomy group. There is a comparable low number of recurrences in both groups. This is probably caused by the consequent selection of patients for sequestrectomy according to well-defined criteria. This article was published in Spine (Phila Pa 1976) and referenced in Journal of Spine

Relevant Expert PPTs

Recommended Conferences

  • 18th Global Neurologists Annual Meeting on Neurology and Neurosurgery
    Nov 13-15, 2017, Athens, Greece
  • 2nd International Conference on Pediatric Neurology  
    August 31-September 01, 2017 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 12th Global Neurologists Annual Meeting on Neurology and Neurosurgery
    November 16-18, 2017 Lisbon, Portugal

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords