Author(s): Webster BS, Courtney TK, Huang YH, Matz S, Christiani DC
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore concurrence with evidence-based management of acute back pain by primary care specialty and years in practice groups. METHODS: Participants randomly selected from five American Medical Association physician groups were surveyed asking their initial care recommendations for case scenarios with and without sciatica. Response differences were compared among groups and with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline. RESULTS: Response rate was 25\%. Emergency physicians were least likely to order diagnostic studies for both cases but more often made recommendations likely to promote inactivity. Occupational physicians were less likely to order diagnostic studies and more likely choose treatments conducive to increasing activity. The longer physicians were in practice, the less likely they were to follow recommendations. All specialty groups selected more nonevidence-based interventions for the patient with sciatica. General practitioners were least likely to follow the guidelines in either case. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread dissemination of acute low back pain guidelines, the study suggests a lack of adherence by certain primary care groups, physicians with more practice experience, and in specific areas of management.
This article was published in J Occup Environ Med
and referenced in Journal of Spine