alexa Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach
Pharmaceutical Sciences

Pharmaceutical Sciences

Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Author(s): Yoon K Loke, Deirdre Price, Andrew Herxheimer

Abstract Share this page

Background As every healthcare intervention carries some risk of harm, clinical decision making needs to be supported by a systematic assessment of the balance of benefit to harm. A systematic review that considers only the favourable outcomes of an intervention, without also assessing the adverse effects, can mislead by introducing a bias favouring the intervention. Much of the current guidance on systematic reviews is directed towards the evaluation of effectiveness; but this differs in important ways from the methods used in assessing the safety and tolerability of an intervention. A detailed discussion of why, how and when to include adverse effects in a systematic review, is required. Methods This discussion paper, which presupposes a basic knowledge of systematic review methodology, was developed by consensus among experienced reviewers, members of the Adverse Effects Subgroup of The Cochrane Collaboration, and supplemented by a consultation of content experts in reviews methodology, as well as those working in drug safety. Results A logical framework for making decisions in reviews that incorporate adverse effects is provided. We explore situations where a comprehensive investigation of adverse effects is warranted and suggest strategies to identify practicable and clinically useful outcomes. The advantages and disadvantages of including observational and experimental study designs are reviewed. The consequences of including separate studies for intended and unintended effects are explained. Detailed advice is given on designing electronic searches for studies with adverse effects data. Reviewers of adverse effects are given general guidance on the assessment of study bias, data collection, analysis, presentation and the interpretation of harms in a systematic review. Conclusion Readers need to be able to recognize how strategic choices made in the review process determine what harms are found, and how the findings may affect clinical decisions. Researchers undertaking a systematic review that incorporates adverse effect data should understand the rationale for the suggested methods and be able to implement them in their review.

This article was published in BMC Med Res Methodol and referenced in Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

  • Sundeep Kumar Upadhyaya
    LONG TERM DRUG-FREE CLINICAL-REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH RA ON cDMARDs
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Li Yu-Jung
    Intra-maxillary Drug delivery and Bio-sensing via Dental Implant and its considerations
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Muhamed Fakhri Omer
    Cathodoluminescence petrography for provenance studies of the sandstones of Ora Formation (Devonian-Carboniferous), Iraqi Kurdistan Region, Northern Iraq
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Mustafa M Hariri
    Importance of methods’ selection in the geosciences studies and exploration
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Afsar Rahbar
    Studies of the importance of Cytomegalovirus infection in breast cancer
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Carsten Worsoe
    The value of the “simulated study” as a tool to predict actual leachables in parenteral drug products
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Jim Polarine
    Case studies of human fl ora and spore contamination in clean rooms
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Diane Paskiet
    Qualifi cation of extractables & leachables from container closure systems in drug products- Introduction to the Product Quality Institute (PQRI) recommendations
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Gulay Yelken Demirel
    Challenges in parenteral formulation development studies and an evaluation from QbD point of view
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Li-Chun Tsou
    Drug delivery device strategy for patient centric therapies
    PDF Version
  • Neervalur V Raghavan
    Systematic approach to development of aqueous drug formulation and drug device combination injectable products and challenges
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Jianfeng Hong
    Extractable and leachable studies of parenteral infusion and transfusion products
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Panayiotis P Constantinides
    Parenteral Drug Nanodispersions : Manufacturing, Characterization and In Vitro/In Vivo Performance Evaluation
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Jan Voskuil
    How antibodies can prevent medical progress and how they can be great tools?
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Yosef Yarden
    Classically, the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) is that region in eukaryotic protein-coding genes from the translation termination codon to the polyA signal. It is transcribed as an integral part of the mRNA encoded by the gene. However, there exists another kind of RNA, which consists of the 3’UTR alone, without all other elements in mRNA such as 5’UTR and coding region. The importance of independent 3’UTR RNA (referred as I3’UTR) was prompted by results of artificially introducing such RNA species into malignant mammalian cells. Since 1991, we found that the middle part of the 3’UTR of the human nuclear factor for interleukin-6 (NF-IL6) or C/EBP gene exerted tumor suppression effect in vivo. Our subsequent studies showed that transfection of C/EBP 3’UTR led to down-regulation of several genes favorable for malignancy and to up-regulation of some genes favorable for phenotypic reversion. Also, it was shown that the sequences near the termini of the C/EBP 3’UTR were important for its tumor suppression activity. Then, the C/EBP 3’UTR was found to directly inhibit the phosphorylation activity of protein kinase CPKC in SMMC-7721, a hepatocarcinoma cell line. Recently, an AU-rich region in the C/EBP 3’UTR was found also to be responsible for its tumor suppression. Recently we have also found evidence that the independent C/EBP 3’UTR RNA is actually exists in human tissues, such as fetal liver and heart, pregnant uterus, senescent fibroblasts etc. Through 1990’s to 2000’s, world scientists found several 3’UTR RNAs that functioned as artificial independent RNAs in cancer cells and resulted in tumor suppression. Interestingly, majority of genes for these RNAs have promoter-like structures in their 3’UTR regions, although the existence of their transcribed products as independent 3’UTR RNAs is still to be confirmed. Our studies indicate that the independent 3’UTR RNA is a novel non-coding RNA species whose function should be the regulation not of the expression of their original mRNA, but of some essential life activities of the cell as a whole.
    PPT Version | PDF Version
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords