alexa The health economics of asthma and rhinitis. I. Assessing the economic impact.
Pharmaceutical Sciences

Pharmaceutical Sciences

Pharmacoeconomics: Open Access

Author(s): Weiss KB, Sullivan SD

Abstract Share this page

Abstract As new health care strategies compete with existing ones for limited resources, the health care system and its providers are beginning to turn to health economic analyses to help inform choices in the delivery of care. This 2-part review examines the current health economic literature for asthma and rhinitis. This first installment of the review focuses on studies that characterize the economic burden of asthma and rhinitis and examines how resources are allocated to the care of persons with asthma and rhinitis. In 1998, asthma in the United States accounted for an estimated 12.7 billion dollars annually. Similarly, in 1994, allergic rhinitis was estimated to cost 1.2 billion dollars. Most of the costs for these conditions are attributed to direct medical expenditures, with medications emerging as the single largest cost component. Indirect costs also represent an important social effect. While cost-of-illness studies help to characterize the economic burden, comparative health economic studies evaluate the value of new and existing strategies for clinical care. The second part of this review will explore how comparative studies have contributed to understanding how to best diagnose and treat asthma and allergic rhinitis. This article was published in J Allergy Clin Immunol and referenced in Pharmacoeconomics: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

  • Clinical Trials
    September 11-13, 2017 San Antonio, Texas, USA

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version