Author(s): Mitropoulos P, Rahiotis C, Kakaboura A, Vougiouklakis G
Abstract Share this page
Abstract AIM: This study compared the impact of low-powered magnification on the detection of occlusal caries. METHODS: The occlusal surfaces of 38 extracted teeth received caries ICDAS classification with and without magnification by two examiners. Histology was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: No significant differences existed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and Az values for the two examiners and modalities. Interexaminer agreement was almost perfect for grades 0, 2, 3 irrespective of magnification. For grade 1, magnification resulted in lower agreement than unaided vision. CONCLUSION: Magnification does not improve the detective performance of visual examination. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
This article was published in Caries Res
and referenced in Pediatric Dental Care