alexa Usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient in evaluation of children with aortic valve stenosis and comparison to gradient at catheterization.
Cardiology

Cardiology

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Author(s): Bengur AR, Snider AR, Serwer GA, Peters J, Rosenthal A

Abstract Share this page

Abstract To assess the usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient as a noninvasive indicator of the need for intervention, 33 children (ages 3 months to 20 years) with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) underwent a 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examination a median of 1 day before cardiac catheterization. The clinical decision for intervention was based on finding a catheterization peak-to-peak pressure gradient of greater than 75 mm Hg or from 50 to 75 mm Hg in the presence of symptoms or an abnormal exercise treadmill test result. Of the 33 patients, 23 required intervention. The decision for intervention was compared to the Doppler mean gradient, and the Doppler peak and mean gradients were compared to the catheterization peak-to-peak gradient. All 12 patients with a Doppler mean gradient greater than 27 mm Hg had intervention and had a catheterization peak-to-peak gradient of greater than or equal to 75 mm Hg. All 3 patients with a Doppler mean gradient less than 17 mm Hg had no intervention and had a peak-to-peak gradient less than 50 mm Hg. The remaining 18 patients with Doppler mean gradients between 17 and 27 mm Hg comprised an intermediate group in whom the Doppler mean gradient alone did not predict the need for intervention. From a chi-square table, a Doppler mean gradient greater than 27 mm Hg predicted the need for intervention with 100\% specificity (no false positives) and 52\% sensitivity (11 false negatives).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article was published in Am J Cardiol and referenced in Journal of Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords