alexa Validation of a New Clinico-Radiological Grading for Compound Head Injury: Implications on the Prognosis and the Need for Surgical Intervention.
Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation

Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation

Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy

Author(s): Dhandapani S, Sarda AC, Kapoor A, Salunke P, Mathuriya SN,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Lack of risk stratification among patients with varying severities of compound head injury has resulted in too-inconsistent and conflicting results to support any management strategy over another. The purpose of this study was to validate a new clinico-radiological grading scheme with implications on outcome and the need for surgical debridement. METHODS: Patients who sustained an external compound head injury with no serious systemic injury and no pre-established infection and who continued the entire treatment were studied prospectively for their proposed grade of compound injury in relation to infective complications, unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), delayed seizures, mortality, and hospital stay for 3 months. Appropriate univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among a total of 344 patients, 182 (53\%) had no dural violation or midline shift (Grade 1), 56 (16\%) had cerebrospinal fluid leak or pneumocephalus (Grade 2), 34 (10\%) had exposed brain (Grade 3), 47 (14\%) had midline shift (Grade 4), and 25 (7\%) had both exposed brain and midline shift (Grade 5). Each successive grade of compound injury had significant incremental impact on all the outcome measures studied. Infective complications in Grades 1 to 5 were noted among 7\%, 9\%, 27\%, 28\%, and 36\% of patients, respectively (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in unfavorable GOS (23\% vs. 56\%, odds ratio [OR] 4.3, P < 0.001) and mortality (17\% vs. 42\%, OR 3.5, P < 0.001) between Grades 1-2 and Grades 3-5. Delayed seizures were noted in 4\%, 4\%, 9\%, 13\%, and 16\% of patients in Grades 1-5 (P = 0.04). The median hospital stay was 1, 3, 6, 6, and 8 days, respectively (P < 0.001). All patients in Grades 4-5 (72) underwent surgery. Only 32 of 182 (18\%) patients in Grade 1, 9 of 56 (16\%) patients in Grade 2, and 23 of 34 (68\%) patients in Grade 3 underwent surgical debridement, whereas the rest were managed conservatively. Patients who were managed conservatively had significantly lower infective complications (3\% vs. 25\%, OR 9.67, P < 0.001) in Grade 1, and (2\% vs. 44\%, OR 36.8, P = 0.002) in Grade 2, compared with those who underwent surgical debridement. In multivariate analysis, the proposed grade had significant independent association with infection (P < 0.001), unfavorable GOS (P = 0.01), delayed seizures (P = 0.001), and hospital stay (P < 0.001), and each successive grade had significant incremental impact on both infective complications and unfavourable GOS, independent of GCS and other prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The new grading scheme appears to be of practical clinical significance. It shows significant statistical associations with the rates of infection, unfavorable neurologic outcome, delayed seizures, mortality, and duration of hospital stay. The incremental impact of each successive grade on infective complications and unfavorable GOS was independent of GCS and other prognostic factors. Conservative management had significantly lower infection compared to surgical debridement, at least in patients with Grades 1 and 2. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This article was published in World Neurosurg and referenced in Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]ine.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords