alexa Validation of several SUV-based parameters derived from 18F-FDG PET for prediction of survival after SIRT of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Medicine

Medicine

Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research

Author(s): Fendler WP, Philippe Tiega DB, Ilhan H, Paprottka PM, Heinemann V,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract (90)Y radioembolization (selective internal radiation therapy [SIRT]) is a valuable therapeutic option for unresectable hepatic metastases arising from primary colorectal cancer. The present study evaluated the prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters for predicting survival after SIRT. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer were treated with SIRT. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at baseline and 3 mo after the treatment. Metabolic volume, total lesion glycolysis, and maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV(max) and SUV(peak), respectively) according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST 1.0) were obtained from 3 liver lesions in each patient, and the corresponding percentage changes from baseline to follow-up were calculated. Tumor response was defined as more than a 30\% decrease in these parameters. Furthermore, response was evaluated in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Toxicity events and survival were recorded. RESULTS: Overall median survival after SIRT was 60 wk. Responders who had a change in metabolic volume or total lesion glycolysis had significantly longer survival (92 vs. 49 wk [P = 0.006] and 91 vs. 48 wk [P = 0.025], respectively). However, neither RECIST 1.1 criteria nor changes in SUV(peak) or SUV(max) after treatment predicted outcome (P = 0.086 for RECIST; P = 0.310 for change in SUV(peak); P = 0.155 for change in SUV(max)). CONCLUSION: Changes in metabolic volume and total lesion glycolytic rate as measured by (18)F-FDG PET predicted survival in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, whereas changes in SUV(peak) or SUV(max) and RECIST 1.1 criteria did not predict survival. This article was published in J Nucl Med and referenced in Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

  • Seema Narayan
    A comparative study of the link between real exchange rate of ASEAN countries and fossil fuel prices
    PDF Version
  • Navinchandra G. Ashar
    Comparative study of techno-economic evaluation of the production of liquid Sulphur Di Oxide
    PDF Version
  • Wei Gong
    Wei Gong-Huazhong-University-of-Science-and-Technology-China-Probabilistic-seismic-hazard-assessment-for-the-pseudo-negative-stiffness-control-of- a-steel-base-isolated-building-A-comparative-study-
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Abdullah Altin
    Abdullah-Altin-Van-Yuzuncu-Yıl-University-Turkey-A-comparative-study-on-optimization-of-machining-parameters-by-turning-nickel-based-super-alloys-according-to-taguchi-method
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Nahla A El-Wakil
    Comparative study of enzymatic and chemical denaturation of wheat gluten and their cellulosic nanocomposites
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Krzysztof Wieczerzak
    A comparative transcriptome provides candidate genes for determination the cause of males infertility.
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Flavia Secco Tavares de Souza
    A Comparative Study Among Elective Conventional Surgery, Urgency/Emergency Conventional Approaching and Elective Videolaparoscopic Surgery on the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients at First Surgeric Clinic of Federal Hospital of Bonsucesso with a Diagnostic of Colorectal adenocarcinoma, between January 2010 and December 2012
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Rajendra K Ray
    Comparative Study And Improvement Of Shallow-Water Models
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Nisreen E. Mahmoud
    Parasitological and comparative pathological studies on monogenean infestation of cultured sea bream (Sparus aurata, Sparidae) in Egypt.
    PPT Version | PDF Version

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords