Author(s): Ekblom O, Nyberg G, Bak EE, Ekelund U, Marcus C
Abstract Share this page
Abstract BACKGROUND: Wrist-worn accelerometers may provide an alternative to hip-worn monitors for assessing physical activity as they are easier to wear and may thus facilitate long-term recordings. The current study aimed at a) assessing the validity of the Actiwatch (wrist-worn) for estimating energy expenditure, b) determining cut-off values for light, moderate, and vigorous activities, c) studying the comparability between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph (hip-worn), and d) assessing reliability. METHODS: For validity, indirect calorimetry was used as criterion measure. ROC-analyses were applied to identify cut-off values. Comparability was tested by simultaneously wearing of the 2 accelerometers during free-living condition. Reliability was tested in a mechanical shaker. RESULTS: All-over correlation between accelerometer output and energy expenditure were found to be 0.80 (P < .001).Based on ROC-analysis, cut-off values for 1.5, 3, and 6 METs were found to be 80, 262, and 406 counts per 15 s, respectively. Energy expenditure estimates differed between the Actiwatch and the Actigraph (P < .05). The intra- and interinstrument coefficient of variation of the Actiwatch ranged between 0.72\% and 8.4\%. CONCLUSION: The wrist-worn Actiwatch appears to be valid and reliable for estimating energy expenditure and physical activity intensity in children aged 8 to 10 years.
This article was published in J Phys Act Health
and referenced in Journal of Novel Physiotherapies
- Uduakobong E Ntuk
Ethnic variation in the contribution of cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength to diabetes: Cross-sectional study of 68,116 UK Biobank participants
PPT Version | PDF Version