alexa Visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.
Ophthalmology

Ophthalmology

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology

Author(s): Araie M, Yamagami J, Suziki Y

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Differences in visual field characteristics between normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and high-tension glaucoma (HTG) have not been established. This study re-examined the problem by pointwise between-group comparison of data obtained with the Humphrey 30-2 program. METHODS: Sixty-eight NTG cases with maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) of 21 mmHg or lower and 62 HTG cases with maximum IOP of 25 mmHg or greater with a mean deviation (STATPAC) greater than -10 decibels (dB) were included. Age, refraction, mean deviation, or sex ratio were matched between the two groups. Total deviation (STATPAC), the difference between the measured threshold and the age-corrected normal reference at each test point of the 30-2 program, was used for pointwise between-group comparisons. Another parameter, total deviation - mean total deviation, was introduced to normalize the total deviation by the overall visual field damage as an index of disease stage. Mean total deviation is the average of total deviations across the test field. Further, logistic discriminant analysis was applied to confirm that the difference at a questioned test point was due to the difference of disease type, but not disease stage, between the two groups. RESULTS: Comparison using total deviation and total deviation - mean total deviation gave similar results, which were collaborated by logistic discriminant analysis. For a given amount of visual field damage, an area just above the horizontal meridian was significantly more depressed in NTG, while HTG had significantly more diffuse visual field damage. CONCLUSION: Visual field defect of NTG differs from that of HTG, which may suggest that different regions of the optic disc are more susceptible to damage in NTG.
This article was published in Ophthalmology and referenced in Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords