alexa Abstract | Cost-minimization Analysis between Sevelamer and Lanthanum in Treating Hyperphosphatemia among Patients with End-stage Renal Disease in China

Journal of Health & Medical Economics
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article Open Access


Background: Hyperphosphatemia is a great challenge for all countries, which contributes to vascular calcification and is associated with all-cause mortality for patients with chronic kidney disease. There are evidences showing the better efficacy in mortality, hospitalization of non-calcium based phosphate binders versus calcium-based phosphate binders. This study aims to provide scientific evidence on economic evaluation between two new non-calcium based phosphate binders, sevelamer and lanthanum, among end-stage renal disease patients in China through cost-minimization analysis from a patient perspective. Methods: A cost-minimization analysis comparing sevelamer and lanthanum was conducted based on a review of current clinical evidence in treating hyperphosphatemia in China. The local unit costs, the equivalent dose ratios, estimated daily doses and survival extrapolation in published studies were applied. Results: Our cost analysis indicates that sevelamer is likely to cost less than lanthanum in the local  ontext of China with potential savings of up to approximately RMB 38,000 per patient over an estimated survival projection of 5.38 years for a dialysis patient with hyperphosphatemia. Conclusion: For the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in end-stage renal disease patients in China, our analysis demonstrates sevelamer being likely a cost-saving option compared to lanthanum, both non-calcium based phosphate binders that provide more efficacious alternatives than calcium-based phosphate binders. 

To read the full article Peer-reviewed Article PDF image | Peer-reviewed Full Article image

Author(s): Li Yang Seng Chuen Tan Can Chen and Xinya Li


Hyperphosphatemia, Disease burden, Phosphate binder, Sevelamer, Cost-minimization, China, Behavioral Economics, Burden of Disease, Cost Benefits, Demand and Supply, Disease Management, Health Consumerism, Health Crisis, Health Economics, Health insurance, Medical Debt, Pharmacoeconomics, Prescription Costs, Pharmacoepidemiology, Outcomes and Clinical Trials Data, Cost Minimization, Modelling Studies, Pharmaceutical Products, Financial Information

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version