alexa Abstract | Exploring reasons for variation in ordering thyroid function tests in primary care: a qualitative study

Quality in Primary Care
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Paper Open Access


Background: The ordering of thyroid function tests (TFTs)
is increasing but there is not a similar increase in thyroid
disorders in the general population, leading some to query
whether inappropriate testing is taking place. Inconsistent
clinical practice is thought to be a cause of this, but there is
little evidence of the views of general practitioners, practice
nurses or practice managers on the reasons for variation in the
ordering of TFTs.
Aim: To find out the reasons for variation in ordering of TFTs
from the perspective of primary healthcare professionals
Fifteen semi-structured interviews were carried out with
primary healthcare professionals (general practitioners,
practice nurses, practice managers) that used one laboratory of
a general hospital in South West England for TFTs. Framework
Analysis was used to analyse views on test ordering variation at
the societal, practice, individual practitioner and patient level.
Results: A number of reasons for variation in ordering across
practices were suggested. These related to: primary healthcare professionals awareness of and adherence to national policy changes; practices having different protocols on TFTs ordering; the set-up and use of computer systems in practices; the range of practice healthcare professionals able to order TFTs; greater risk-aversion amongst general practitioners and changes in their training and finally how primary healthcare staff responded to patients who were perceived to seek help more readily than in the past.
Conclusion: The reasons for variation in TFTs ordering are complex and interdependent. Interventions to reduce variation in TFTs ordering need to consider multiple behavioural and contextual factors to be most effective.


To read the full article Peer-reviewed Article PDF image

Author(s): Rebecca Hardwick


thyroid disorders, test (ordering), primary care, qualitative research, Innovative primary care, Primary care medicines, Advanced concepts in primary care

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version