alexa Abstract | Quality and appropriateness of referrals for dementia patients

Quality in Primary Care
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

International Exchange Open Access


Objective To evaluate the quality and appropriateness of referrals from general practitioners (GPs) to geriatricians of patients with suspected dementia.Design A retrospective review of referrals from primary health care to a department of geriatric medicine. A data sheet was developed froma reviewof previous literature. Two GPs and two geriatricians assessed the quality and appropriateness of the referrals.Setting Patient records in the geriatric department were collected, registered and scrutinised.Subjects A total of 135 first-time referrals from January 2002 to December 2002 were evaluated. All patients and relatives were informed that participation was voluntary and anonymity was guaranteed. Main outcomes Assessment of the appropriateness of referrals.Results The mean age of all referred patients was 78.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 7.3; range 42–90 years) and 61.5% were female; 81 (60.0%)referrals were initiated by GPs, 33 (24.4%) by family members, three (2.2%) by community nurses, nine (6.7%) by the patients themselves and referral initiation was not specified for nine (6.7%). The agreement on appropriateness of referrals between the geriatricians was 83.7% (kappa 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55– 0.79; P = 0.03) and the GPs was 71.1% (kappa 0.21; 95% CI 0.07–35.3; P < 0.001). After consensus, theagreement between the geriatricians and GPs was 57.8%(kappa 0.08; 95% CI 0–0.23). This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).Conclusion There was disagreement between geriatricians and GPs regarding the appropriateness of referrals. It was found that time-consuming tests were infrequently performed or reported, and key medical information was absent from the referral letters.

To read the full article Peer-reviewed Article PDF image | Peer-reviewed Full Article image

Author(s): Sundaran Kada Harald A Nygaard Jonn T Geitung Bickol N Mukesh Mala Naik Grete Wold Dag H Soevik


Innovative primary care, Primary care medicines, Advanced concepts in primary care

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version