alexa Abstract | An Audit on the Quality of Intra-Oral Digital Radiographs Taken in a Postgraduate Paediatric Dentistry Setting
ISSN: 2247-2452

Oral Health and Dental Management
Open Access

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article Open Access

Abstract

Background: Quality assurance (QA) for radiographs sustains accurate diagnostic information while maintaining radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Aims: To audit the quality of digital intraoral periapical (IOPAs) and bitewings (BWs) radiographs taken in a postgraduate paediatric dentistry setting. Standards: The National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) guidance describes three grades of radiograph quality. Excellent (Grade 1 >70% of total exposures), diagnostically acceptable (Grade 2 <20%) and unacceptable (Grade 3 <10%). Methodology: A pilot study was performed on 10 IOPAs and 10 BWs. 50 IOPAs and 50 BWs were reviewed in 2 audit cycles with a 6 month interval (total of 200 X-rays). Results: First Cycle: Of 50 IOPAs: 18 (36%) scored Grade 1, 25 (50%) Grade 2 and 7 (14%) Grade 3. Of 50 BWs: 10 (20%) scored Grade 1, 33 (66%) Grade 2 and 7 (14%) Grade 3. Second Cycle: Of 50 IOPAs: 28 (56%) scored Grade 1, 15 (30%) Grade 2 and 7 (14%) Grade 3. Of 50 BWs: 27 (54%) scored Grade 1, 17 (34%) Grade 2 and 6 (12%) Grade 3. Rejection rate of Grade 3 was analysed in both cycles. A clear improvement in radiograph quality was demonstrated between both cycles, but the standard was not met. Action plan and recommendations: Results were disseminated to all staff and recommendations to improve radiograph quality were made to use film holders and paediatric film sizes. Conclusion: Although a significant improvement was observed in the 2nd cycle, the overall standard of radiographs fell short of the guidelines. Thus, the quality of radiographs requires continuous auditing to reach the gold standard. An audit spiral is planned.

To read the full article Peer-reviewed Article PDF image

Author(s): Anas Salami, Manal Al Halabi, Iyad Hussein, Mawlood Kowash

Keywords

Radiographs, Paediatric dentistry, Quality assurance, Audit, Dental Radiography, Pediatric Dentistry

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
 
 
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords