alexa Scleromalacia Perforans–What We Know and What We Can Do | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-9570
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Scleromalacia Perforans–What We Know and What We Can Do

Dorota Kopacz1*, Piotr Maciejewicz1 and Mieczysław Kopacz2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
2Individual Medical Practice, Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding Author : Dorota Kopacz, MD, PhD
Department of Ophthalmology
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Poland
Tel: (48) 22 502 16 04
Fax: (48) 22 502 21 47
E-mail: [email protected]
Received January 20, 2013; Accepted March 01, 2013; Published March 08, 2013
Citation: Kopacz D, Maciejewicz P, Kopacz M (2013) Scleromalacia Perforans– What We Know and What We Can Do. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol S2:009. doi:10.4172/2155-9570-S2-009
Copyright: © 2013 Kopacz D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology


Anterior necrotizing scleritis without inflammation, so called scleromalacia perforans, is a rare, severe eye disorder developing on autoimmune damage of episcleral and scleral performing vessels (hypersensitivity type III). The onset of the disease is insidious, progression is slow and no specific symptoms are observed until discoloration of the sclera (necrotic slough, bare choroid) is detected. Scleromalacia perforans is most common in women with long-term rheumatoid arthritis, but it was also observed with other systemic diseases. There is no specific and efficient treatment. As it develops on autoimmune abnormalities immunosuppressive therapy is proposed. To preserve globe integrity, scleral patch grafting (both tissues and synthetic materials) with subsequent immunosuppression is performed.

Scleromalacia perforans; Rheumatoid nodules; Extraarticular arthritis; Immunosuppressive therapy
Classification, Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations
The sclera is a dense connective tissue covering about five sixths of the eye [1,2]. Watson and Hayreh (based on the anatomic site of the inflammation and on the changes in scleral vasculature) proposed two main categories of the eye wall inflammation: episcleritis (simple and nodular) and scleritis (anterior and posterior) [2,3]. Analysis of the anterior scleritis subclassified it into diffuse, nodular and necrotizing (with inflammation-anterior necrotizing scleritis- or without inflammation-scleromalacia perforans).
Scleromalcia perforans (SP) is a rare (only 4% of scleritis) scleral disease, characterized by the progressive scleral thinning without inflammation [4]. The condition was previously described by Van der Hoeve: he noted that it was bilateral, began with yellow or greyish subconjunctival nodules and gradually developed into scleral necrosis with perforation and exposure of the uvea [1,5-7]. It is difficult to define the onset of the disease because of slow progression and total lack of symptoms. The change in scleral color is detected by patient’s family, by patient looking in the mirror or ophthalmologist during routine examination. Progression of the disease reveals as necrotic slough without surrounding inflammation; absorption or slough separation leave bare uvea, covered only by thin layer of conjunctiva. Nevertheless perforations are uncommon without trauma [1,2,4]. The area of scleral lack is surrounded with pathological vessels anastomosing with each other or crossing the abnormal area to join with perilimbal vessels [1,4,5,8]. SP is commonly associated with severe, progressive, long standing rheumatoid arthritis with extra-articular manifestation, more frequent in women [1,2,6]. The condition was also described in other systemic vasculitic and collagen disorders (up to 66%): systemic lupus erythematosus, periarteritis nodosa, Wegener’s granulomatosis, Behçet disease, limited scleroderma, Crohn’s disease, graft-versus-host disease. SP was also observed in porphyria and herpes-zoster infection [2,8-15] (Figure 1).
Verhoeff and King published the first histological report of the condition: changes in the scleral nodules were similar to those of the subcutaneous nodules of the rheumatoid arthritis [6,16]. Chronic granulomatous changes with epithelioid cells surround central, necrotic masses (collagen and noncollagen fibers, cell debris). Young and Watson suggest three determinants of scleral destruction: activation of scleral fibrocytes and resorption of pericellular matrix, infiltration of the scleral stroma by inflammatory cells, prolonged local vasoocclusion. In SP dense plaques of necrotic tissues are removed and it is associated with full thickness loss of conjunctiva and insufficiency of conjunctival epithelium to resurface the exposed area [1,6,8,9,17-19].
Fluorescein Angiography
Watson and Bovey analyzed vascular disorders in scleritis: results of fluorescein angiography shown differences between scleromalacia perforans and other scleritis [20]. In SP necrotic process appears to be the result of arteriolar–not venular like in anterior necrotizing scleritisobliteration [1,20].
Visual loss, secondary to progression of astigmatism (sclear and paralimbic/corneal changes), anterior uveitis, cataract (secondary to uveitis or steroid therapy) or glaucoma (secondary to ocular abnormalities or steroid therapy), was described generally in late stages of the scleritis (up to 60% cases) [1,2,4].
There is no specific and efficacious therapy [21]. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and steroids are insufficient [1,2]. In literature we can find report on favourable clinical response to the topical sodium versenate used as an inhibitor of collagenolytic enzyme [12]. To treat refractory cases topically used cyclosporine A is described [2,22,23].
Irrespectively of the final diagnosis, autoimmune reaction is responsible for the vessels damage (type III hypersensitivity) [1,2,24]. That is why in cases with severe necrotizing scleritis immunosuppressive therapy, supplemented with steroids is suggested to interrupt destructive process [1,2,6,9,12-15,17,18,24]. Cyclophosphamide is known as the most effective drug in patients with noninfectious necrotizing scleritis (oral dose 2-3 mg/kg/d). Other immunosuppressive drugs like methotrexate (7.5-20 mg weekly), azathioprine (starting dose 2,5 mg/kg/d), cyclosporine (2.5-5.0 mg/kg/d) and mycophenolate mofetil (2-3 g/d)are well described [1,2,8,11,13,17,23]. So called “biologics” are the new group of modifying immune response agents. There are some reports describing: tumor necrosis factor inhibitors–TNF1 (etanercept, infliximab), the interleukin-2 receptor blocker (daclizumab), the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra), the antilymphocyte medicament (rituximab, alemtuzumab) in ocular diseases, including scleritis. To detect and prevent side effects of immunosuppressive therapy, a collaboration with physicians trained in the early recognition and management of drug-induced complication is recommended (e.g. hematologist, rheumatologist, internal medicine specialist) [1,2,8,25-27].
Surgical treatment of SP is necessary in those cases with exposed uvea to preserve the globe integrity. Tectonic patch grafting can be performed with the sclera (fresh or frozen globe or glycerin preserved scleral tissue), dermis, fascia lata, periosteum, aortic tissue, cartilage, cornea, pedicle-flaps of conjunctiva with Müller muscle or tarsus, synthetic material (GoreTex®) and eventually amniotic membrane. In some cases topical or systemic immunosuppression is necessary to inhibit destruction [1,2,8,12,28-30] (Figure 2).
Scleromalacia perforans is a severe disorder of the globe with insidious onset, slow progression and lack of symptoms until the bare choroid is seen under the thin layer of the conjunctiva. There are a lot of reports about trials of treating it both with medicaments and surgery but no one is completely efficacious. It remains a challenge for further studies.

Figures at a glance

Figure Figure
Figure 1 Figure 2
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11675
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2013 - Aug 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7906
  • PDF downloads :3769

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version