alexa Sex Differences in the Expression of Drug-Metabolizing and Transporter Genes in Human Liver | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7609
Journal of Drug Metabolism & Toxicology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Sex Differences in the Expression of Drug-Metabolizing and Transporter Genes in Human Liver

Lun Yang1, Yan Li1, Huixiao Hong1, Ching-Wei Chang2, Li-Wu Guo2, Beverly Lyn-Cook3, Leming Shi1* and Baitang Ning2*

1Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

2Division of Personalized Nutrition and Medicine, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

3Office of Associate Director of Regulatory Activities, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Leming Shi
National Center for Toxicological Research
3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
Tel: 870-543-7387
Fax: 870-543-7854
E-mail: [email protected]

Baitang Ning
National Center for Toxicological Research
3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
Tel: 870-543-7129
Fax: 870-543-7773
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 11, 2012; Accepted date: July 06, 2012; Published date: July 10, 2012

Citation: Yang L, Li Y, Hong H, Chang CW, Guo LW (2012) Sex Differences in the Expression of Drug-Metabolizing and Transporter Genes in Human Liver. J Drug Metab Toxicol 3:119. doi: 10.4172/2157-7609.1000119

Copyright: © 2012 Yang L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Drug Metabolism & Toxicology


Sex difference; Drug metabolizing enzymes; Transporters; Gene expression; Human liver; DMET; Co-expression network analysis


DMET: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme and Transport


Sex differences in disease susceptibility, drug efficacy, and drug safety have been observed widely in epidemiological studies as well as in clinical reports [1]. In addition, sex differences in the expression of DMETs are thought to be one of the most important determinants accounting for individual differences in clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics [2].

Sex differences in drug metabolism have long been recognized. For example, in 1932, Nicholas and Barron reported that the administration of just one-half of the dosage of sodium amytal needed to anaesthetize male rats could sufficiently anaesthetize female rats [3]. Later, it was found that some drugs were metabolized by certain isoforms of cytochrome P450 with higher rates in male than in female rats (reviewed in [4]). The biochemical basis of sex differences in drug metabolism was also shown to be related to hormonal regulation of the production of drug metabolizing enzymes in animals and humans [5]. During the last several decades, sex differences in drug responses have been extensively investigated using multiple approaches, such as clinical pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. This effort attempts to provide information to allow a better understanding of the biological basis of sex differences in order to improve public health.

Drug response and efficacy are highly dependent on the bioavailability, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of a drug, all of which are processes driven primary by enzymes. Thus, sex differences in the expression of DMETs play a vital role in determining sex differences in drug efficacy and safety. Sex differences in the expression of DMET genes have been documented. Excluding the effects of menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and application of contraceptives, Tanaka observed higher CYP3A4 activity in women than in men, in contrast to higher activities of CYP2C16, CYP2D6 and CYP2E1 in men than in women [6]. Reviewing others’ work, Scandlyn et al. concluded that CYP3A4 appeared to have a higher activity in women while CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 have higher activities in men [7]. By summarizing enzymatic activities from nearly 150 samples of human liver microsomes and 64 samples of human hepatocytes, Parkinson et al. concluded that there was no statistically significant difference in CYP3A4 activity between men and women in liver microsomes, but women had a two-fold higher CYP3A4 activity in their primary hepatocytes compared to men [8].

Sex differences in the expression of human DMET genes have been widely studied; however, most of the previous studies have been limited by sample size and/or the number of genes profiled. In addition, the common mechanisms involved in sexually differential regulation of DMETs in healthy human liver and their potential impact on drug therapy and public health are far from clear.

In the current study, previously published gene expression data derived from 234 male and 193 female human liver samples [9] was used to systemically analyze sex differences in the expression of 374 DMET genes in human liver. Co-expression networks were constructed to delineate the regulatory mechanisms involved in sex differences in the expression of human DMETs. Finally, the relationships between sexually dimorphic DMET genes and compounds regarding to clinical outcomes, molecular and cellular functions, and their implications to human diseases are discussed.


Gene expression data set

The dataset used for this analysis was from a previously published study [9,10] consisting of 427 liver samples consisting of 234 male and 193 female samples retrieved from three independent liver collections. The gene expression data were generated using an Agilent microarray platform with 39,302 probes corresponding to 19,541 genes. The microarrays were processed in a two-color mode using a common reference design. The expression level of a gene was expressed in the form of log10 ratio of its intensity value in the subject sample channel divided by the intensity value in the common reference channel.

Identification of differentially expressed genes

To identify genes differentially expressed between the sexes, a fold change was calculated to represent the magnitude of the difference and a Student’s t-test was performed to estimate the statistical significance of the difference between 234 male and 193 female samples for each gene. Genes with a P>0.05 were eliminated, and the remaining genes were ranked by their absolute fold changes. A fold change cutoff value was applied to this ranked list of genes to determine which genes were differentially expressed. To identify the most differentially expressed genes from the entire set of genes profiled on the microarray, a foldchange (FC) cutoff of >1.5 was used in order to focus on a relatively small number of genes. For the identification of sexually dimorphic expression of DMET genes, a relatively small cutoff FC>1.1 was used in order to be able to examine as many differentially expressed genes as possible from the 374 DMET genes profiled on the microarray.

Functional analysis of differentially expressed DMET genes

The identification of gene enrichment categories was determined according to the Gene Ontology (GO) categorization (http://www., Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (, and SP-PIR keywords that combined the annotation from both Swiss- Prot (SP) and Protein Information Resource (PIR). Information on gene function, gene-chemical/drug interaction, and gene-disease relationship was obtained from GeneCardsTM 3.0 ( The significance level was determined by Fisher’s exact test and Bonferroni correction for multiple category comparisons. The Novoseek score of the relevance of the chemical compound/drug to the gene was evaluated based on literature text-mining algorithms. The relationships between the top 10 sexually differentially expressed DMET genes and their corresponding top 5 related chemicals, as well as the top 5 related diseases were visualized using Cytoscape (

Construction of gene co-expression network

Co-expression networks have been applied to explore the functional similarities among groups of genes. Within a network, genes associated with specific biological processes usually are co-expressed and clustered which allows one to look at the overall gene-gene correlation structure at a high-throughput level [11]. The 3,548 sexually differentially expressed genes (corresponding to 3,835 probes), with a FC value greater than 1.1 in the expression levels between sexes were selected for constructing the gene co-expression networks [12]. A 3,548 by 3,548 matrix of the pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients was constructed to represent the similarity between any two genes in terms of their expression profiles across the 427 liver samples. This sirted to an adjacency matrix by the function, image where aij

denotes the connection strength between gene expressions xi and xj across 3,548 genes. The parameter β in the co-expression network is approximately scale-free [13]. The model fitting index R2 of the linear model that regresses log [p (k)] on log (k) was introduced to measure the fitting of the network to this scale-free topology, where k is the connectivity and p (k) is the probability density of the connectivity. A β value of 6 was chosen because it achieved a fitting index greater than 0.8. The adjacency matrix was further transformed into a topological overlap matrix (TOM) [14], in which the topological overlap between two genes reflects not only their direct interactions but also their indirect interactions through all the other genes in the network. The average linkage hierarchical clustering was applied to group genes based on the TOM. Genes within a module are of higher topological overlap with each other than with genes outside this module.


General status of sex differences in human hepatic gene expression

We used a combination of P-value<0.05 and fold-change (FC)>1.5 to identify the set of genes that are most differentially expressed between male and female liver samples, resulting in a list of 80 genes from the entire list of 19,541 genes probed on the microarray. 19 of these genes were located on sex specific chromosomes, of which, 7 were on the X chromosome and 12 were on the Y chromosome. The 5 most differentially expressed genes were located on the sex chromosomes and showed more than 20-fold (FC>20) differences in signal intensity between male and female samples. The remaining 61 genes were found on autosomal chromosomes. Among these 80 genes, the expression levels of some genes were dominated by female samples while others were dominated by male samples. Ten DMET genes were found to be differentially expressed with more than 1.5-fold differences, including SLC3A1, CYP7A1, ACSL4, CYP3A7, GSTA1, CYP3A4, GSTA2, UGT2B17, SLC13A1 and ADH1A (first 10 genes in Table 1).

Number Gene Symbol Gene Title P-value Fold Change Sex Biased
1 SLC3A1 solute carrier family 3 (cystine, dibasic and neutral amino acid transporters, activator of
cystine, dibasic and neutral amino acid transport), member 1
7.27E-12 2.35 F
2 CYP7A1 cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 1.28E-10 2.1 F
3 ACSL4 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 0.00266 2 F
4 CYP3A7 cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 7 9.35E-08 1.83 F
5 GSTA1 glutathione S-transferase A1 0.000132 1.82 F
6 CYP3A4 cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 4 5.25E-06 1.73 F
7 GSTA2 glutathione S-transferase A2 0.00266 1.69 F
8 UGT2B17 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B17 0.0002 1.59 M
9 SLC13A1 solute carrier family 13 (sodium/sulfate symporters), member 1 0.0166 1.57 M
10 ADH1A alcohol dehydrogenase 1A (class I), alpha polypeptide 0.00003 1.53 F
11 CYP2A6 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily A, polypeptide 6 0.0147 1.49 F
12 SLC10A1 solute carrier family 10 (sodium/bile acid cotransporter family), member 1 0.00288 1.48 F
13 CYP2A7 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily A, polypeptide 7 0.0212 1.46 F
14 GSTA5 glutathione S-transferase A5 0.00496 1.43 F
15 CYP2A13 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily A, polypeptide 13 0.0272 1.43 F
16 HMGCR 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase 1.03E-06 1.39 F
17 GLYAT glycine-N-acyltransferase 0.00223 1.38 F
18 SLC16A8 solute carrier family 16, member 8 (monocarboxylic acid transporter 3) 0.0419 1.35 F
19 FMO3 flavin containing monooxygenase 3 0.0025 1.34 F
20 ADH1C alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (class I), gamma polypeptide 0.00801 1.34 M
21 CYP2B6 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B, polypeptide 6 0.0265 1.33 F
22 ADH4 alcohol dehydrogenase 4 (class II), pi polypeptide 0.0367 1.33 F
23 CYP2B7P1 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B, polypeptide 7 pseudogene 1 0.034 1.32 F
24 ADH1B alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (class I), beta polypeptide 0.0116 1.31 F
25 EPHX2 epoxide hydrolase 2, cytoplasmic 0.00129 1.3 F
26 CYP3A43 cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 43 0.00074 1.3 F
27 SLCO1B1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1B1 0.0151 1.29 F
28 CYP39A1 cytochrome P450, family 39, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 0.00138 1.29 F
29 ABCA12 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 12 0.0133 1.29 M
30 SLC5A6 solute carrier family 5 (sodium-dependent vitamin transporter), member 6 8.32E-06 1.29 M
31 SLC16A14 solute carrier family 16, member 14 (monocarboxylic acid transporter 14) 0.0298 1.28 M
32 FMO1 flavin containing monooxygenase 1 4.37E-08 1.27 F
33 ALDH1B1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member B1 0.0151 1.27 F
34 CYP3A5 cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 5 0.00455 1.27 F
35 NR1I2 nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2 0.00354 1.25 F
36 GNMT glycine N-methyltransferase 0.0424 1.25 F
37 UGT2B28 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B28 0.0344 1.25 F
38 UGT2A3 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide A3 0.00407 1.24 F
39 SLC22A7 solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 7 0.0103 1.24 F
40 ALDH1A1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 0.00812 1.23 F
41 SLC22A1 solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 1 0.0125 1.22 F
42 AADAC arylacetamide deacetylase (esterase) 0.00517 1.22 F
43 BAAT bile acid Coenzyme A: amino acid N-acyltransferase (glycine N-choloyltransferase) 0.0242 1.22 F
44 CES4 carboxylesterase 4 (monocyte/macrophage serine esterase 4) 0.0158 1.22 F
45 SLCO4A1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 4A1 0.000551 1.22 M
46 ADH7 alcohol dehydrogenase 7 (class IV), mu or sigma polypeptide 0.0252 1.21 F
47 ALDH7A1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 7 family, member A1 0.00186 1.21 F
48 NNMT nicotinamide N-methyltransferase 0.000628 1.21 M
49 UGT2B10 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B10 0.0345 1.2 F
50 CBR1 carbonyl reductase 1 0.000228 1.2 F
51 ALDH5A1 aldehyde dehydrogenase 5 family, member A1 (succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase) 0.00441 1.2 F
52 CYP51A1 cytochrome P450, family 51, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 0.000344 1.2 F
53 GPX2 glutathione peroxidase 2 (gastrointestinal) 0.000185 1.2 M
54 ORM2 orosomucoid 2 0.0023 1.2 M
55 HNMT histamine N-methyltransferase 0.00187 1.19 F
56 FMO5 flavin containing monooxygenase 5 0.034 1.19 F
57 MAOB monoamine oxidase B 0.0106 1.19 F
58 CYP2J2 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily J, polypeptide 2 0.00155 1.19 F
59 ORM1 orosomucoid 1 0.00164 1.19 M
60 CHST9 carbohydrate (N-acetylgalactosamine 4-0) sulfotransferase 9 0.00038 1.18 F
61 SLC2A2 solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 2 0.0355 1.18 F
62 SLC19A2 solute carrier family 19 (thiamine transporter), member 2 0.0116 1.18 F
63 ABCA2 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 2 4.61E-06 1.17 F
64 SAT1 spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase 1 0.00121 1.17 F
65 SLC16A9 solute carrier family 16, member 9 (monocarboxylic acid transporter 9) 0.0261 1.17 F
66 SLC10A2 solute carrier family 10 (sodium/bile acid cotransporter family), member 2 0.00207 1.17 M
67 ABCA1 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 1 0.000414 1.17 M
68 ACSL1 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 0.0122 1.16 F
69 CYP27A1 cytochrome P450, family 27, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 0.00892 1.16 F
70 CYP4Z1 cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily Z, polypeptide 1 0.0123 1.16 F
71 GPX3 glutathione peroxidase 3 (plasma) 0.0000818 1.16 M
72 CES1 carboxylesterase 1 (monocyte/macrophage serine esterase 1) 0.018 1.15 F
73 SULT1C2 sulfotransferase family, cytosolic, 1C, member 2 0.0323 1.15 M
74 SLC22A4 solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 4 0.00243 1.14 M
75 ABCB1 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member 1 4.72E-06 1.13 M
76 SLC22A23 solute carrier family 22, member 23 0.0134 1.13 M
77 CYP1B1 cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 0.0152 1.13 M

Table 1: DMET genes with sex differences in human hepatic expression.

Sexually differential expression of human DMET genes

To explore sex differences in the expression of human hepatic DMET genes, we focused on analysis of 374 DMET genes profiled on the microarray. With a relaxed FC cutoff value of 1.1 in addition to a P-value less than 0.05, 77 DMET genes were found to be sexually dimorphic in human hepatic expression (Table 1). The top 10 most differentially expressed DMET genes (ranked by FC values) based on sex were further analyzed using GeneCardsTM ( Among these 10 genes, CYP7A1, CYP3A7, CYP3A4, and ADH1A are involved in phase I metabolism; ACSL4, GSTA1, GSTA2, and UGT2B17 are phase II metabolizing enzymes, while SLC3A1 and SLC13A1 are transporters. Table 2 lists the top 10 genes, the biological pathways and associated diseases represented as well as drugs/ chemicals metabolized by these genes.

Gene Symbol Sexually Dimorphic Changes (Fold Chang) P-value Top 5 of Related Drugs Major Biological Functions/Pathways
SLC3A1 2.35 7.27 × 10-12 N/A Carbohydrate/cellular amino acid metabolism, ion/amino acid/basic amino acid/Lysine/transmembrane transport
CYP7A1 2.1 1.28 × 10-10 N/A Bile acid biosynthetic process, cholesterol catabolic process, xenobiotic/steroid/bile acid/cellular lipid metabolism, cholesterol homeostasis, oxidation-reduction process, regulation of bile acid biosynthetic process, cellular response to glucose stimulus/cholesterol
ACSL4 2 2.66 × 10-3 N/A Lipid/fatty acid/triglyceride/cellular lipid metabolism, response to nutrient, learning or memory, fatty acid transport, dendrite development, triglyceride biosynthetic process, long-chain fatty-acyl-CoA biosynthetic process, embryonic process involved in female pregnancy/response to interleukin-15
CYP3A7 1.83 9.35 × 10-8 Cisapride, Idazolam, Vitamin D, Xenobiotics Xenobiotic metabolic process, oxidation-reduction process
GSTA1 1.82 1.32× 10-4 Busulfan, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Etoposide Glutathione/xenobiotic metabolism
CYP3A4 1.73 5.25 × 10-6 Alprazolam, Anthracycline, Asparaginase, Cisapride,Citalopram Lipid/xenobiotic/steroid/androgen/monoterpenoid/drug/vitamin D/heterocycle metabolic process, steroid/alkaloid/exogenous drug catabolism, oxidation-reduction process, oxidative demethylation
GSTA2 1.69 2.66 × 10-3 N/A Glutathione/xenobiotic metabolism
UGT2B17 1.59 2.00 × 10-4 Losartan Metabolic/steroid metabolic process/retinoic acidbinding/glucuronosyltransferase activity/transferase activity/ transferring hexosyl groups
SLC13A1 1.57 1.66 × 10-2 Succinic acid Transporter activity/symporter activity/sodium:sulfate symporter activity/ion transport/dium ion transport/sulfate transport/transmembrane transport
ADH1A 1.53 3.00 × 10-5 N/A Alcohol/xenobiotic metabolism, ethanol oxidation, oxidation-reduction process

Table 2: Top 10 of the most sexually differentially expressed DMETs and their biological functions.

Gene co-expression network analysis

The 3,548 sexually differentially expressed genes with a FC>1.1 and P<0.05 were selected for network construction. TOM analysis [14] was performed to examine modules consisting of highly interconnected expression traits within the co-expression network. The topological overlap between two genes reflects not only their direct interaction but also their indirect interactions through other genes in the network.

As illustrated by the TOM analysis (Figure 1A), five distinct modules were identified. Among the 3,548 sex-biased genes, 304 genes fell into these five modules, while the remaining 3,244 genes did not fall into any module. Since genes within a module are usually co-expressed together with a higher correlation than genes outside of the module, it can be inferred that genes within the same module have similarities in function or regulatory roles. To further infer the biological relevancy of genes within a module, gene enrichment analysis was performed for each module using the following functional databases: GO category, KEGG pathways, and SP-PIR keywords. Figure 1 Bhighlights genes showing sexually dimorphic expression within each module and among different modules, indicating that these modules in the coexpression network were organized into different functional units. Biological functions listed in Table 3 showed that the five modules were significantly enriched by functional traits. The turquoise module, the largest module positively correlating with sex-based differential expression, was enriched with genes involved in oxidation/reduction, electron carrier, drug metabolism and fatty acid metabolism. This suggests that genes shown in the turquoise module are highly related to xenobiotic metabolism and transportation, since oxidation and reduction reactions are involved in major phase I drug-metabolism while electron transfer is associated with many phase III transport processes.


Figure 1: The Human Liver Gene Co-Expression Network of All Genes with Sex Differences.
(A) Topological overlap matrix (TOM) of all 3,548 sexually differentially expressed genes. Both the rows and the columns are sorted by hierarchical clustering. The colors specify the strength of the pair-wise topological connections (yellow: not significantly connected; orange: highly connected). Genes that are highly connected within a cluster are defined as a module. Each module was assigned a unique color identifier (turquoise, blue, green, yellow and brown), with the remaining genes colored gray; (B) The visualization of the co-expression network for sexually differentially expressed genes. The graph highlights that genes in the liver coexpression network fell into five distinct modules, where genes within a module were expressed with a higher correlation with each other than that of genes outside this module.

Module Category Term Count % P-value
Yellow KEGG PATHWAY Ribosome 14 56 4.34E-22
GOTERM_CC_FAT Ribosomal subunit 13 52 3.55E-21
Turquoise SP_PIR_KEYWORDS Oxidoreductase 62 26.61 9.16E-42
GOTERM_BP_FAT Oxidation reduction 64 27.47 4.39E-37
GOTERM_MF_FAT Electron carrier activity 29 12.45 1.74E-18
KEGG_PATHWAY Drug metabolism 19 8.15 7.67E-16
KEGG_PATHWAY Fatty acid metabolism 16 6.87 3.07E-15
Blue GOTERM_BP_FAT Wound healing 7 9.86 6.18E-05
GOTERM_BP_FAT Response to wounding 10 14.08 1.03E-04
GOTERM_BP_FAT Rlatelet activation 4 5.63 2.06E-04
Green SP_PIR_KEYWORDS Acetylation 13 43.33 6.34E-05
GOTERM_BP_FAT Translational elongation 4 13.33 5.61E-04
GOTERM_CC_FAT Cytosolic ribosome 3 10 6.32E-03
Brown SP_PIR_KEYWORDS Protein biosynthesis 13 27.08 6.26E-15
GOTERM_CC_FAT Cytosolic ribosome 11 22.92 3.22E-14
GOTERM_BP_FAT Translational elongation 11 22.92 5.36E-14
KEGG_PATHWAY Ribosome 11 22.92 3.84E-13

Table 3: Top enrichment terms for the five modules.

Regulation network for sexually differentially expressed DMET genes

Although sex differences in the expression of human DMET genes have been observed, the underlying biological mechanisms for such regulation are far from being fully understood. To search for common ground of such regulatory mechanisms, we constructed a co-expression network based on the expression of the sexually dimorphic DMET genes. In the network (Figure 2), a line between two genes indicates a similarity in the expression level of these genes across 427 liver samples, and thus may suggest commonality in the regulation of their expression. Figure 2 represents a global view of the network, displaying the co-expression relationship of these DMET genes that may imply putative regulatory pathways.


Figure 2: DMET Genes Co-Expression Network.
All sexually differentially expressed DMET genes are arranged in the inner circle. Three hub genes (FMO3, ALDH5A1 and SLC10A1), which have many more neighbors than others, are selected for a better visualization effect. Three genes CYP3A4, OTC and CYP2A6 with known expression regulatory mechanisms are in white.

Growth hormone periodicity [15], sex hormonal control [16], and genetic differences [17] between the sexes are believed to be fundamental factors in regulating sexually dimorphic expression of genes. Dhir et al. [18] reported that CYP3A4 expression was increased by continuous treatment with growth hormone (masculine) and was suppressed by pulsatile treatment of growth hormone (feminine). In the co-expression network analysis, FMO3, GSTA1, GSTA2, GSTA5, ALDH5A1 and SLC10A1 showed similarities with CYP3A4, suggesting that the sexually dimorphic expression of these enzymes may have a mechanistic commonality with CYP3A4. The expression of CYP2A6 in humans can be induced by estrogen via its receptor [19], thus CYP2A6-connected genes, including ALDH5A1, CYP2B6, CYP2B7P1, SLC10A1, GSTA1, GSTA2, and GSTA5 in the network may share similar mechanisms for differential expression. Another major source of sex-biased gene expression is the difference between the inactive and active X chromosome genes regulated by both genetic (such as XIST gene products for the specific silencing of X-chromosome genes [20]) and epigenetic (such as altered histone acetylation and DNA methylation for gene silencing [21]) mechanisms. Although ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OTC) does not belong to DMETs, as an X-chromosome specific gene, regulation of its expression by the above mechanisms may provide insight for better understanding why some of the DMETs, such as GSTA1, GSTA2, GSTA5, SLC22A1, UGT2B28, ADH1A, ADH4, and ALDH5A1, show sexually dimorphic gene expression patterns. Interestingly, CYP3A4, CYP2A6 and OTC are all connected to GSTA1, GSTA2, GSTA5 and ALDH5A1, indicating that these genes may be involved in the crosstalk among sex hormone control, growth hormone control, and X chromosome specific gene clusters. Notably, with multiple connections with other DMETs, FMO3, SLC10A1 and ALDH5A1 also behaved as “hubs” in the network, indicating that they have expression similarities with other DMETs and thus may have more complicated mechanisms accounting for their sexually dimorphic expression.

Role of DMET genes in human diseases and drug metabolism

DMET genes play important roles in human physiology and drug metabolism. The implication of differentially expressed DMET genes in drug metabolism and disease susceptibilities in a sexdependent manner is of much interest. The interaction between differentially expressed DMETs and their metabolized endogenous and exogenous compounds (e.g., steroid hormones and drugs) and related susceptibilities to diseases (e.g., metabolic disorders and cancer), was analyzed by Novoseek analysis in GeneCardsTM. To display these associations, Cytoscape was used to integrate and visualize genechemical relationships and gene-disease relationships.

The relationships between the top 10 sexually dimorphic DMET genes and related endogenous and exogenous compounds, as well as related human diseases were analyzed. Since many compounds and diseases may be related to a gene, only the top 5 ranked compounds and top 5 ranked diseases based on Novoseek scores are presented in Figure 3, and more detailed information for the contexts of such interactions are listed in the Supplement Table 1. As shown in Figure 3, the top 10 sexually dimorphic DMET genes have interactions with the metabolism of exogenous compounds and/or human diseases, and several of these genes share a similar relationship with the same group of compounds or are related to similar diseases. For example, hydroxylation activities of CYP2A6 and CYP3A7 could be inhibited by troleandomycin [22], and midazolam is metabolized both by CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 [23]. CYP2A6 and GSTA1 are both involved in metabolic activation of several procarcinogens, and thus have been linked (in expression levels or genotypes) to the etiology of cancers such as tobacco-related lung cancer [24], colorectal cancer [25] and breast cancer [26].


Figure 3: Interaction of DMET Genes with Compounds and Human Diseases.
Cytoscape was applied to depict the relationship between DMET genes and compounds and human diseases. Only the top 5 chemicals and the top 5 diseases associated with the top 10 sex-biased DMET genes were analyzed; and more details can be found in Supplementary Table 1. The following symbols and colors are used: pink circles for genes, white diamond for chemicals, and red octagons for human diseases.

Interestingly, co-interaction of SLC10A1 and CYP7A1 with cholesterol is also depicted in Figure 3. Cholesterol homeostasis is balanced between dietary cholesterol uptake and endogenous cholesterol synthesis and excretion of bile acids. Bile acid synthesis from cholesterol is mediated by CYP7A1, an initial and classic alternative pathway, whereas SLC10A1 assists the hepatic uptake of bile acids as a sinusoidal Na+-bile acid co-transporter [27]. In children with earlyand late-stage cholestasis, SLC10A1 and CYP7A1 were significantly downregulated [28], suggesting that these two genes contribute to cholestasis in human.


A major molecular factor involved in sex-related differences of drug responses and disease development is related to drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and likely related to differential expression of DMET genes. However, very few studies have been done systematically to analyze the expression traits of a large panel of DMET genes in human liver with a sufficient sample size to reliably assess the nature of sexually differential expression of DMET genes. In this study, data were retrieved from a large cohort consisting of 427 human liver samples [10] to analyze the expression profile of 374 DMETs. This panel of DMETs included the majority of DMETs, and the size of the human liver sample cohort appears to be the largest to appear in the public domain.

Different gene expression patterns between males and females were observed for GSTs, SULTs, UGTs, and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters [29]. Consistent with previous work, a large number of differentially expressed CYP 450s were observed, including several that have been previously reported such as CYP7A1 [30] , CYP3A7, CYP3A4, CYP3A43 [31-33], CYP2A6 [34], CYP1B1 [35], CYP2A13 [36], and CYP2B6 [37]. In addition, other DMET genes displayed variable expression differences between genders including phase II metabolism enzymes such as GSTA1, GSTA2, SULT1C2 and UGT2B17, transporter SLC family members such as SLC3A1 and SLC10A1, and ABC family members such as ABCA12 and ABCA1. However, results were also observed that were not consistent with previous literature reports. For example, in this study, expression of ADH1 was 1.53 fold higher in females than in males, which differs from a previous report in which ADH1 expression was significantly higher in males than in females [38]. It is possible that different conclusions were drawn due to the limited sample size, with only 30 males and 20 females in the earlier report; however, other potential differences between the datasets could not be ruled out, such as dietary and medication influences on expression of DMETs.

Awareness of sex differences in response to drugs is clinically important. There is considerable evidence for gender-based differences in clinical studies. For example, CYP3A4-substrate drugs such as cyclosporine, erythromycin, tirilazad, verapamil, nifedipine, diazepam and alfentanil, have a higher clearance in women, which persists even after adjustments for physiological factors (e.g., body weight) [39]. Using 38 datasets containing clearance rates for 18 CYP3A substrate drugs measured in healthy men and women, it has been reported that the overall mean value for the female/male ratio of weight-normalized clearance was 1.26 for parenteral dosage and 1.17 for oral dosage. This result suggests that the sex difference in pharmacokinetics of CYP3A substrate drugs is clinically significant [40]. To determine gender differences in the efficacy and safety of commonly prescribed drugs, Gartlehner et al. analyzed data from 59 studies involving 250,000 patients and concluded that women had substantially lower response rates to antiemetics than men, men had higher rates of sexual dysfunction than women when treated with paroxetine for depression, and women experienced lovastatin-induced adverse events more frequently than men [41]. We believe that interindividual differences in drug metabolism are largely related to the expression of DMET genes, while the high expression/activity of hepatic CYP3A4 in women might partially account for the higher clearance for these drugs. The overall gender-based pharmacologic effects may not be caused by typically monogenetic traits (such as the expression level of CYP3A4); rather, they might be determined by interactions of several drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in multiple pathways of drug metabolism, disposition, and drug targeting. For example, low dose administration of aspirin decreases the risk of stroke for women and the risk of myocardial infarction for men. Side effects of aspirin, gastrointestinal bleeding and peptic ulcer are reported to be significantly more common among women than men [42].

Sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have drawn significant attention in recent years. Being female is known to be a risk factor for developing ADRs with data suggesting that women have a 1.5- to 1.7-fold greater risk of suffering ADRs than men [43]. A review by the U.S. General Accounting Office also showed that eight of the ten drugs withdrawn from the market during the period January 1, 1997 through December 2000 were due to greater risks of ADRs in women [44]. One aspect that can affect perceived sex bias is the number of women vs. men taking each drug. This report noted that 4 of the 8 drugs that were removed may have shown such a bias because these were prescribed more often to women than men. The other 4 drugs, however, did not exhibit this differential prescription rate.

Genetic make-up makes a huge difference in the gene expression between men and women, which in turn introduces gender-based differences in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. If a drug is either not transformed at the anticipated rate (modulated by drug-metabolizing enzymes) or not effluxed/absorbed at the anticipated rate (modulated by transporters), elevated and/or prolonged exposure may occur. When the drug has a narrow therapeutic window relative to safety margin, such a pharmacokinetic difference could precipitate ADRs [45]. Although few studies in the literature could demonstrate that sexually dimorphic DMET gene expression is associated with different disease risks between genders, studies directly or indirectly showed that altered expression levels of DMET genes might change the incidences of various diseases. For example, expression differences in DMET genes such as CYP3A4, CYP2A6 and GSTA1 may be associated with cancer risks. CYP2A6 appears to activate several procarcinogens such as hexamethylphosphoramide, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3- pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and aflatoxin B1, and studies have shown that the CYP2A6 activity is associated with pancreatic cancer [46] and colorectal cancer [25]. CYP3A4*1B conferred an increased risk for the development of prostate cancer through mediation of prostate cell growth and differentiation [47], while a functional study demonstrated that CYP3A4*1B enhances CYP3A4 expression by altering its promoter binding affinity to transcriptional factors compared to CYP3A4*1A [48]. GSTA1*1B, a polymorphism located in the promoter of GSTA1, is associated with decreased hepatic expression of GSTA1, which was discovered in a population study using human liver samples [49]. An epidemiological study demonstrated that decreased expression of GSTA1 is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, especially in consumers of well-done red meat, since GSTA1 is involved in the detoxification pathway of food-born heterocyclic amines [50].

Generally, several known contributors have been reported to regulate the expression of DMETs, such as genetic components [51], epigenetic mechanisms [52], orphan nuclear receptors [53], and sexhormone and/or growth-hormone regulated transcription factors [15]. Among these postulated mechanisms, sex hormones and growth hormones are thought to be the most important factors regulating sexually dimorphic expression of DMET genes. For example, there is evidence that many isoform-specific changes in DMET activities are mediated via sex hormones and/or growth hormones [54]. However, more studies are warranted to examine the underlying mechanisms responsible for hormonal-induced changes in sexually dimorphic DMET expression/activity. The co-expression network analysis in this study displayed commonalities of expression characteristics among sexually differentially expressed DMET genes, suggesting that bioinformatic approaches might be useful tools to identify underlying regulatory mechanisms for genes with similar expression patterns. Together with previous knowledge of possible pathways regulating the DMET gene expression in human liver, the gene-gene regulation network should help to better understand the global regulation mechanisms of sexually dimorphic expression of DMET genes.

Often information on age, medication history, chemical exposure, and disease status of donors of liver samples are unknown, confounding the results from in vitro studies of DMET expression and activity in human liver microsomal samples. These confounding factors also constrained the interpretation of results in the current study. However, taking the large sample size, a broad spectrum of DMETs and the systematic approach to analyze sexually dimorphic gene expression and its clinical implications into consideration, the present study should help to understand interindividual differences in drug/xenobiotics responses and human disease susceptibilities between males and females.


This work was partially supported by the Office of Women’s Health at the FDA.

LY, YL and LG were supported by appointments to the Postgraduate Research Program at the National Center for Toxicological Research administered by Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the FDA.

We thank Drs. Barry Delclos, Jeffery Fisher and Weida Tong for their critical review of this manuscript.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12161
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2012 - Jul 16, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8371
  • PDF downloads : 3790

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7