alexa Shelf-life of Biofertilizers: An Accord between Formulations and Genetics | OMICS International
Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Shelf-life of Biofertilizers: An Accord between Formulations and Genetics

Satinder Kaur Brar*, Saurabh Jyoti Sarma and Emna Chaabouni

Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau, Terre & Environnement (INRS-ETE), 490, Rue de la Couronne, Québec (QC), G1k 9A9 Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Satinder Kaur Brar
Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau
Terre & Environnement (INRS-ETE), 490, Rue de la Couronne
Québec (QC), G1K 9A9 Canada
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: October 25, 2012; Accepted date: October 27, 2012; Published date: October 30, 2012

Citation: Brar SK, Sarma SJ, Chaabouni E (2012) Shelf-life of Biofertilizers: An Accord between Formulations and Genetics. J Biofertil Biopestici 3:e109. doi:10.4172/2155-6202.1000e109

Copyright: © 2012 Brar SK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research

To meet the steady demand of food supply, application of fertilizer is indispensable in modern agriculture. Role of fertilizers has already been proven by many countries with green revolution and by attaining food self-sufficiency within short period of time. Actually, application of synthetic/chemical fertilizers not only supplies essential nutrients to food crops but also provides them in an easily available manner. Therefore, these fertilizers can quickly enhance the growth and productivity of food crops and are quick to gain popularity. However, extensive use of such fertilizer leads to serious environmental concerns. Nitrate leaching and surface/ground water pollution due to increased use of fertilizer is directly related to human health problems. Similarly, freshwater contamination by chemical fertilizer/fertilizer residue is one of the major causes of eutrophication. Likewise, increased greenhouse gas emission as well as heavy metal uptake and accumulation by food crop could be considered as other environmental problems emerged due to synthetic fertilizers [1]. Moreover, chemical fertilizer could eliminate the beneficial microbial as well as insect community of soil. Alternatively, many of these problems can be surmounted by utilization of biofertilizers. It may not be a realistic idea to completely replace the chemical fertilizers by biofertilizer; however, biofertilizers have the potential to supplement the synthetic fertilizers and to significantly reduce its use.

In general, biofertilizers are living microorganisms, unlike chemical fertilizers; they themselves are not the source of nutrients but can help the plants in accessing the nutrient available in its surrounding environment. The microorganisms commonly used as biofertilizers may be nitrogen fixing soil bacteria (Rhizobium, Azotobacter), nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria (Anabaena), phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas putida) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Similarly, phyto-hormone (auxin) producing bacteria and cellulolytic microorganisms could also be part of biofertilizer formulation. When applied to the field, the activities (nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, production of phytohormones) of the plants are benefited resulting in improved growth and productivity. Therefore, viability of these organisms during production, formulation, storage, transportation/distribution and field application is directly related to plant growth promoting potential of a biofertilizer formulation. The complaint from farmers regarding the efficiency of biofertilizer is not uncommon and improper storage and longer duration between production and field application could be the best explanation for such incidents. This limits their use due to compatibility, stability and survival issues under different soil conditions. Hence, improved shelf life could be the key for further popularization of biofertilizer application.

Presently, a range of commercial biofertilizer formulations are available and different strategies have been applied to ensure maximum viability of the microorganisms used in such formulations. These strategies comprise: (i) optimization of biofertilizer formulation, (ii) application of thermo-tolerant/drought-tolerant/genetically modified strains and, (iii) application of liquid biofertilizer. For convenience of application, a carrier material is used as a vehicle for the microorganisms to be used as biofertilizer. Moreover, such materials may have a role in maintaining the viability (shelf-life) of the microorganisms prior to its release into the field as well as they also provide a suitable microenvironment for rapid growth of the organisms upon their release. A carrier could be a material, such as peat, vermiculite, lignite powder, clay, talc, rice bran, seed, rock phosphate pellet, charcoal, soil, paddy straw compost, wheat bran or a mixture of such materials. In common practice, for better shelf-life of biofertilizer formulation, a carrier or a mixture of such carrier materials are selected based on the viability of the microorganisms mixed with them. Similarly, pre-sterilization of the carrier material and its enrichment with nutrient is the other strategy to improve the shelf-life by allowing the microorganism to maintain/ grow in a non-competitive microenvironment [2]. Sucrose, maltose, trehalose, molasses, glucose and glycerol are some supplementary nutrients and/cell protectants commonly used with a carrier material to ensure maximum cell viability and extended shelf-life.

Liquid biofertilizer formulation could be considered as one potential strategy for improving the shelf-life of biofertilizer. Unlike solid carrier based biofertilizers, liquid formulations allow the manufacturer to include sufficient amount of nutrients, cell protectant, and inducers responsible for cell/spore/cyst formation to ensure prolonged shelf-life. The shelf-life of common solid carrier based biofertilizers is around six months; however, it could be as high as two years for a liquid formulation [3,4]. Further, solid carrier based biofertilizers are less thermo-tolerant whereas; liquid formulations can tolerate the temperature as high as 55°C [3,5]. Hence, improved shelf-life could be achieved by the application of a liquid biofertilizer formulation. However, process cost of liquid biofertilizer is significantly higher than a solid formulation. Thus, successful commercialization of less expensive liquid biofertilizer is a challenge and shelf-life of such products is still a concern.

Consequently, efforts are also underway to conceive efficient biofertilizers compatible with a wide range of soils and plants by molecular and genetic engineering. For instance, biofertilizers have been produced, firstly, based on nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria found “naturally” in the root nodules of legumes. However, these bacteria are not able to provide non-leguminous plants with the nitrogen that they fix from the atmosphere. In this case, molecular engineering is of particular interest, since it allows the development of effective delivery systems, so that non-leguminous plants can be grown with symbiotic rhizobial root nodules without the need for added nitrogen fertilizers [6].

Rhizobial biofertilizers are well-known for their potential to increase significantly plant yields under controlled conditions, but the strains fail to survive under certain soil conditions and they completely lose their ability to increase productivity. Since 1991, this has been associated with the weak competitiveness of rhizobial biofertilizers in relation to the indigenous soil microorganisms in the use of some nutrients. For example, some studies have shown that the failure to survive by the rhizobial strains, in the presence of other soil microorganisms is related to their inability to taking iron from soil. To improve their resistance, a gene increasing the iron use was isolated from another strain (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) and introduced into rhizobia [7]. Such genetic manipulation led to the growth stimulation. Thus, genetic manipulation is another way to enhance the stability of biofertilizers; nevertheless, it cannot totally replace the formulations as it would be a pre-step in production followed by formulation. Thus, a concerted effort between soil chemists, microbiologists, geneticists and agronomists is needed to facilitate enhanced shelf-life of biofertilizers to obtain better agricultural yields sustaining the environmental and human health.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12662
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2012 - Jul 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8768
  • PDF downloads : 3894

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version