alexa Standardized Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (s_LORETA) is a Sensitive Indicator of Protracted Neuropsychological Impairments Following “ Mild ” (Concussive) Traumatic Brain Injury
ISSN: 2155-9562
Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Standardized Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (s_LORETA) is a Sensitive Indicator of Protracted Neuropsychological Impairments Following “ Mild ” (Concussive) Traumatic Brain Injury

Paula L Corradini and Michael A Persinger*

Departments of Psychology and Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding Author:
Michael A Persinger
Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory
Behavioural Neuroscience Program
Departments of Psychology and Biology
Laurentian University, Sudbury
Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6
Tel: 01-705-675-4824
Fax: 01-705-671-3844
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Received date: October 31, 2013; Accepted date: November 26, 2013; Published date: December 04, 2013

Citation: Corradini PL, Persinger MA (2013) Standardized Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (s_LORETA) is a Sensitive Indicator of Protracted Neuropsychological Impairments Following “Mild” (Concussive) Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurol Neurophysiol 4:176. doi:10.4172/2155-9562.1000176

Copyright: © 2013 Corradini PL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology

Abstract

Background: Differentiation of patients who have sustained a mild TBI and who show continued difficulties with adaptation is a major clinical challenge and a time-consuming process when classical neuropsychological testing is involved. LORETA (Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography) was employed to discern its sensitivity for differentiating the regions of the cerebrum for patients who exhibited continued difficulties with adaptation and showed either no or formal neuropsychological impairment years after the injury. Methods: The quantitative electroencephalographic data for total of 14 patients who had sustained a mild TBI and who either displayed moderately-severe neuropsychological impairment (n=7) or did not (n=7) according to the results of a standardized battery were analyzed by s_LORETA software. The centroid Talairach (X,Y,Z) components for each major frequency band that were significantly different between the two populations were computed. Results: Averaged s_LORETAs demonstrated that the group of patients who displayed formal moderate-severe neuropsychological impairments more than five years after the injury displayed differential power values compared to the group of patients who also sustained a TBI but exhibited no formal impairment within regions that were consistent with the residual subjective symptoms. The s_LORETA analyses, including data collection, required less than 1 hr. Conclusion: A 30 minute sample of QEEG data when applied to s_LORETA software can reveal the general regions of the cerebrum that remain anomalous for years after the initial injury. Employment of this technology could be more efficient and provide greater precision for the strategic interventions that could facilitate the patients’ adaptation.

Keywords

s_LORETA; Quantitative electroencephalography; TBI; Mild brain injury; Neuropsychological assessments; Protracted delays in adaptation

Introduction

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), particularly Closed Head Injuries (CHI) where there is no conspicuous damage or fracture of the skull, produces a non-linear effect upon the patient’s adaptation, productivity, and quality of life [1]. The capricious consequences from the dispersions of mechanical forces and energies through cerebral space can result in a continuum of changes that range from no discernable or overt alterations to severe psychopathologies. Whereas subtle alterations, such as “changes in personality” may require years to evolve and may be discernable primarily by the immediate caregivers, more conspicuous manifestations such as depression, subjective experiences of loss of “the self” [2], somatic complaints, and most significantly the diminished capacity to reconstruct experiences (autobiographical memory) may predominant the patient’s profile. These pernicious changes can be present for years following a closed head injury even though the person appears “normal”. The cerebral correlates of these changes are expected to be dynamic, more electrical and chemical rather than structural, and require sensitive technologies to be discerned.

Although visibly obvious changes in cerebral structure have been well documented by both CT (Computerized Tomography) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) for severe brain injuries [3] the cerebral correlates and substrates for “mild” TBIs that include “concussions” or episodes following mechanical impact to the skull when there was not a suspension of consciousness have been more difficult to verify with these methods [4]. Yet more or less permanent neuropsychological impairments occur in a large subpopulation of patients who have sustained such injuries. Test-retest studies involving patients who sustained cerebral impacts from motor vehicle incidents have shown there is very little change in impairment after about one year, that is, almost no “improvement” or “recovery” even when years have elapsed since the initial impact [5]. The pattern was also noticed in a subpopulation of athletes who had sustained concussive injuries; almost half the number of that population had not returned to previous employment more than a decade later [6].

Roberts and his colleagues [7,8] were among the first to identify that serial concussive injuries from proximal explosions during military operations resulted in long term disabilities associated with neuropsychological impairments and the emergence of a syndrome that was similar to complex partial epilepsy, but without the display of overt electrical seizures or convulsions. This “Epileptic Spectrum Disorder” was associated with abnormal elevations on multiple psychometric scales by which psychologists infer psychopathology. Roberts and his colleagues demonstrated that these patients display enhanced theta activity [9], similar to that exhibited during interictal periods by verified complex partial epileptic patients. The symptoms were partially responsive to anticonvulsants such a carbamazepine (Tegretol) but at dosages lower than those prescribed for classical epileptic patients. Many if not most of their patients had been attributed diagnoses such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder or some variant of an affective disorder.

Gorman and Persinger [10] reported that patients who sustained TBIs from mechanical impacts to the skull but with either no suspension of consciousness or suspension for less than 10 min, reported extreme elevations in reported signs and symptoms that reflected the Epileptic Spectrum Disorder. The major proportion of the patients who displayed mild to moderate neuropsychological impairment also displayed these marked elevations. In a subpopulation of military personnel who had been exposed within the previous two to three years to repeated concussive injuries from proximal explosions, the concurrence was particularly elevated. Previous clinical trials for patients who had sustained mild to moderate TBIs but who had not returned to employment because of “continued difficulties” with depression, deficits in memory, and markedly diminished rate of cognitive processing, indicated marked subjective improvement with carbamazepine which also improved mood [11]. Subsequent unpublished studies indicated similar improvements, particularly diminished pain, with low dosages of GABApentin (Neurontin).

Although neuropsychological assessments involving standardized, performance-based tests can be very revealing with respect to the magnitude of the deficits and the class of behavioral weakness displayed by the patient, a thorough assessment requires more than 10 to 12 hours over a two day period in order to accommodate factors such as motivation, inter-test reliability and validity, and persistence. Recently Corradini and Persinger [12] found that the employment of s_LORETA or standardized Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography was remarkably sensitive to revealing activation of regions of the cerebrum associated with the most powerful components of the neuropsychological test battery. For healthy young adults s_LORETA revealed frequency specific changes in power: (1) within the right prefrontal region during engagement of the Category Test, (2) within the left superior temporal region during the Speech-Sounds Test, and (3) within the medial prefrontal region during toe Graphaesthesia activation. This method of analysis has also been employed in clinical paradigms in order to explore differences between varying “mental illnesses”. By employing this analysis, differences in the pattern of activation has been found between clinical populations. Dementia [13], Huntington’s disease [14], and depression [15] have all been explored using LORETA technology and each study has found a differe5nt pattern of activation depending on the population.

In the present study we compared the s_LORETA profile of patients who had sustained a mild TBI during the previous years and did not display formal neuropsychological impairments with patients who sustained a mild TBI during the same previous period but who displayed moderate to severe neuropsychological impairment. Here we show the clear sensitivity of s_LORETA, which requires less than an hour of data collection and analyses, to differentiate the two populations.

Materials and Methods

Patient history and data base

We randomly selected 26 patients from our data pool; the mean age was 40 years. The mean and standard deviations for the delays between the mechanical impacts to the skulls and the assessments was about 6 years with a range between 0.3 and 16 years. All of them had been referred by external agencies for a full neuropsychological assessment to discern the level of functioning following a closed head injury due to an impact of concussive force or mechanical energies. They all met the criteria of mild TBI on the bases of either a GSC of >13 or a suspension of consciousness of less than 20 min.

The patients had been administered our standard battery [5] of intellectual, memory, academic achievement, classic (Halstead- Reitan Battery) and novel (e.g. Conditioned Spatial Association Test) neuropsychological tests. They were partitioned into groups according to the Halstead-Reitan Impairment Index. For the present study we selected those with indices of less than 0.3 (no impairment) and those with indices of >0.7 (moderate-severe impairment). This resulted in 7 patients per group. The gender ratios, age, and time since the original injury were comparable between groups. Because those individuals with a mild neuropsychological impairment (i.e. Halstead-Reitan Impairment Index between 0.3 and 0.7) occupied an intermediate position between those who had no formal neuropsychological impairment and those individuals with a moderate to severe neuropsychological impairment they were removed from the database so only the extremes of our population were examined. This resulted in 7 patients per group with comparable gender ratios, age and time since original injury.

Table 2 shows pertinent patient information (e.g. age, sex, time since injury, overall Halstead-Reitan Impairment Index). The overall Halstead impairment index is an aggregate score of 7 classical neuropsychological tests that summarizes the overall neurocogntive functioning at the time of the assessment (a score of 0 would indicate no evidence of a formal neuropsychological impairment while a score of 1 would indicate a severe neuropsychological impairment). The individuals who scored in the moderate to severe range displayed a global impairment and typically demonstrated difficulty adapting to the demands of daily life (Table 2).

Frequency Activation Region   Hemisphere X Y Z
Delta Increased BA8 Medial Frontal Gyrus Right 15 25 45
  Decreased BA27 Parahippocampal Gyrus Right 15 -35 0
  Decreased BA30 Posterior Cingulate Right 20 -60 10
Theta Decreased BA27 Parahippocampal Gyrus Bilateral +/-10 -35 0
  Decreased BA30 Posterior Cingulate Bilateral +/-10 -50 0
Alpha1 Decreased BA36/37 Parahippocampal Gyrus Bilateral +/-25 -35 0
  Decreased BA19 Fusiform Gyrus Bilateral +/-25 -60 -15
  Decreased BA20 Inferior Temporal Gyrus Bilateral +/-30 -5 -45
  Decreased BA23/31 Cingulate Gyrus Bilateral +/-5 -25 35
Alpha2 Decreased BA2 Postcentral Gyrus Bilateral +/-50 -30 40
  Decreased BA40 Inferior Parietal Lobule Bilateral +/-45 -35 40
  Decreased BA18 Middle Occipital Gyrus Bilateral +/-30 -95 -5
Beta1 Decreased BA17/18/19 Lingual Gyrus Bilateral +/-10 -60 0
  Decreased BA30 Posterior Cingulate Bilateral +/-5 -70 5
Beta2 Decreased BA17/18 Lingual Gyrus Bilateral +/-5 -90 -20
  Decreased BA18 Middle Occipital Gyrus Left -30 -95 -5
Beta3 Increased BA6 Precentral Gyrus Left -65 -5 25
Gamma Decreased BA18/19 Lingual Gyrus Bilateral +/-15 -75 0
  Decreased BA30 Posterior Cingulate Bilateral +/-15 -65 10
  Decreased BA37 Parahippocampal Gyrus Bilateral +/-25 -35 0

Table 2: Frequency bands, direction of activation, region (Brodmann areas), general description, hemisphere and Talairach coordinates for impaired patients compared to those who were not impaired.

Procedure

The QEEG data were collected in the final hour of the first day of a two day assessment and required about 30 min. During the QEEG the patient sat in a comfortable chair in a dimly lit acoustic chamber. The patient could communicate at any time with the EEG technicians through a microphone and speaker system. The first phase of the QEEG collection was an eyes-open baseline (10 min). The client was asked to pick a spot on the wall in front of them and focus on that spot. They were told they could blink as much as needed but to try and remain as still as possible throughout the duration of the testing. The patient was then asked to close their eyes and to relax; the lights were dimmed. After the eyes-closed portion the client was asked to keep their eyes closed and breathe deeply but very slowly for approximately 45 seconds. After the 45 seconds they told they could relax keeping their eyes closed. After 30 seconds of relaxation they were again asked to deep breath for 45 seconds at a slightly increased pace and then they were asked to relax. Finally they were asked to breathe deeply a third time again at a slightly increased pace for 45 seconds before relaxing.

Quantitative electroencephalography

Brain activity was measured by a Mitsar-201 portable QEEG system that was connected to a 19-channel electrode cap (Electrode- Cap International) that contained the 10-20 Standard Electrode Placement. Electrode site include Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, T6, O1, and O2 that were linked to the ears (A1 and A2) for monopolar recordings. Impedance of all channels was less than 10 kOhm. Data were acquired using WinEEG v2.84.44 software with a sampling rate of 250 Hz. A 50 Hz to 70 Hz notch filter was used in the WinEEG software for all subjects in order to filter high frequency noise during recording. The EEG record was inspected for movement artifacts; the principal component analyses (PCA) method of artifact correction within WinEEG software was employed where appropriate [16].

Source localization (s_LORETA)

Source localization analyses were completed by standardized lowresolution electromagnetic tomography or s_LORETA [17] for 10 samples of QEEG data. These epochs were divided into 2 s segments that did not overlap for the purposes of analyses. Cross-spectral analyses were completed on all epochs. Independent t-tests without normalization were utilized within s-LORETA to discern source localization throughout the telencephalon for each of the software’s defined frequency bands which included delta (1.5-4 Hz), theta (4-7.5 Hz), alpha-1 (7.5 to 10 Hz), alpha-2 (10-13 Hz), beta-1 (13-20 Hz), beta-2 (20-25 Hz), beta-3 (25-30 Hz) and gamma (30 to 40 Hz). Group averages for the impairment and non-impaired patients were obtained. The centroids were expressed according to Talairach coordinates.

Results

The differences in power between the TBI group that did not show formal neuropsychological impairment and the group that displayed moderate to severe impairment within specific regions cerebral space as inferred by s_LORETA for the frequency bands, general cerebral locations (Brodmann areas), hemisphere, and Talairach coordinates are shown in Table 1. To more clearly elucidate these differences, the primary differentiating patterns are shown in subsequent figures. For brevity we will subsequently refer to the group that displayed the moderate to severe neuropsychological impairment as the impaired group and those that were not as non-impairment. However it is important to emphasize that both groups had sustained a mild TBI on average about five years before the measurement. In the figures, red to yellow indicates increased activation and blue represents decreased activation for the impaired individuals compared to the nonimpairment group.

Patient # Sex Age Time since injury (years) Halstead impairment index
1 Male 50 5 0.14
2 Male 20 0.7 0
3 Female 36 2 0.71
4 Female 38 7 0.28
5 Female 26 3 0
6 Female 50 4 1.0
7 Female 32 16 0.14
8 Female 49 4 0.71
9 Male 65 2 0.57
10 Male 20 0.7 0.14
11 Male 61 5 0.57
12 Male 18 0.3 0.28
13 Female 54 0.5 0.71
14 Male 32 4.5 0.57

Table 1: Patient Information.

As can be seen in Figure 1A, the impaired group displayed increased activity within the delta band within the right medial frontal gyrus but decreased activation with the parahippocampal and posterior cingulate regions within that hemisphere. The decreased activity was also evident within the theta band bilaterally within the parahippocampal and posterior cingulate regions (Figure 1B). Within the lower half of the alpha frequency band the diminished activation involved these areas but also expanded into the fusiform (occipitotemporal) gyrus and the inferior temporal gyrus (Figure 1C).

Figure

Figure 1: Activation for individuals in the impairment group relative to the non-impairment group.

The diminished power of activation remained present in the impaired group within the upper band of alpha activity which was regionalized to the parietooccipital region (Figure 1D). The diminished activity within the low beta activity band was centralized within the posterior cingulate and lingual gyrus for the impaired population compared to those who were not (Figure 1E). Finally the power within the faster beta activities, often associated with more complex types of cognition, were diminished for the impaired group within the lingual gyrus, left middle occipital region, and the left precentral gyrus (Figures 1F and 1G). For the gamma range, which is presumably associated with the processes coupled to consciousness (Figure 1H), the impaired group displayed marked diminishment within the paraphippocampal gyrus in particular.

Discussion

To our knowledge this is one for the first quantitative comparisons of s_LORETA profiles for mild TBI patients who either displayed formal moderate to severe neuropsychological impairment or no impairment years after the insult to the cerebrum. Without delineating the details for each patient’s face sheet from the neuropsychological assessment, the pattern of the diminished activity across the various frequency bands reflected the general reports and subjective experiences of the impaired group compared to the group that was not impaired. The impaired group’s major concern, rather than general difficulties with information processing and family interactions, was diminished autobiographical memory, decreased capacity to learn new information as quickly as they did before the TBI, less proficiency for remembering the faces of new acquaintances, and (at least perceived) delay of execution of tasks after rapid or novel visual presentations.

There is consistent experimental congruence with our results. The role of the right prefrontal region for reconstructing episodic memory, of which autobiographical memory is a subset, is well established [18]. Increased delta activity within this region would be expected to diminish the rates of reconstruction. The decreased power within the theta and low alpha band within the parahippocampal region and the adjacent temporal lobe would certainly be consistent with the diffuse difficulties reported by these patients to remember new information [19] since the injury at rates that were at least subjectively similar to before the injury. The coupling between the decreased power within the theta range and the gamma range within the parahippocampal gyrus, considering the importance of these two bands for the intercommunication between the cerebral cortices and the hippocampal formation, could accommodate the experiences of “detachment” of the individuals’ present and past experiences [20].

The results of these analyses and the employment of s_LORETA may be a critical tool that will differentiate patients who still exhibit difficulties with adaptation because of persistent anomalies in cerebral activity. These alterations would not necessarily be obvious by MRI and CT. The speed, inexpensive and non-invasive nature of the measurement, particularly if the validity is generliazable to larger populations, suggests this tool could be an excellent primary indicator. Our clinical group has now begun to develop procedures and protocols with the goal to generate profiles that allow more expeditious and accurate intervention strategies.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11944
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2013 - Jun 19, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8190
  • PDF downloads : 3754
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7