alexa
Reach Us +44-1522-440391
Statins in Chronic Kidney Disease- Are Statins Really Renoprotective | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0959
Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Statins in Chronic Kidney Disease- Are Statins Really Renoprotective

Sanjay Mehra1 and Tejas Desai2*

1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University- Brody School of Medicine, USA

2Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, East Carolina University- Brody School of Medicine, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Tejas Desai
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension
East Carolina University- Brody School of Medicine
2355 West Arlington Blvd, Greenville, USA
Tel: 252-744-1380
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: August 13, 2011; Accepted Date: October 05, 2011; Published Date: October 13, 2011

Citation: Mehra S, Desai T (2011) Statins in Chronic Kidney Disease- Are Statins Really Renoprotective. J Nephrol Therapeutic 1:103. doi:10.4172/2161-0959.1000103

Copyright: © Mehra S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Numerous trials have shown that chronic kidney disease increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. Dyslipidemias have been shown to accelerate progression of kidney disease. Statins have assumed a pivotal role in management of hyperlipidemia. However their effect on renal function is still not fully understood. Some clinical trials have shown some renoprotective effect of statins but there is still need for more data to clarify effects of statins on renal function.

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Cardiovascular disease; Atherosclerosis; Dyslipidemia; Proteinuria

Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

According to the National Kidney Foundation figures, more than 8 million people in the United States have CKD. The leading cause of death in patients with CKD is cardiovascular disease (CVD) and accounts for 40% deaths in patients with end-stage kidney disease [1,2]. Patients with CKD have an increased risk for CVD than those with normal renal function due to co-existing proteinuria, anemia, increased oxidative stress, inflammation and electrolyte imbalances [3-5]. Chade et al. studied coronary flow reserve in patients with CKD without obstructive coronary artery disease and found a reduced vasodilatory capacity in the coronary arteries compared with healthy controls [6]. Researchers have also found that carotid artery intima-media thickness is significantly greater in patients with CKD [7].

Evidence suggests that dyslipidemia contributes to progression of kidney disease and kidney disease progresses more rapidly in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia compared to patients with normal lipid profile due to direct toxic effects of lipids and inflammatory pathways related to dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis [8-10]. The Helsinki Heart study aimed to document an association between progressive kidney disease and dyslipidemia. The study enrolled 2702 middle-aged dyslipidemic men and showed deterioration of renal function by 3% over 5 years and the decline was 20% faster in men with ratio of LDL/HDL>4.4 compared with men with a ratio of LDL/ HDL <3.2 [11]. Dyslipidemia may contribute to early and accelerated vascular changes during early stages of renal impairment. In addition to accelerated atherosclerosis, lipid accumulation in renal cells upregulates intracellular signaling pathways which lead to a cascade of inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways and result in progressive renal impairment [7,12].

Mechanism of Action of Statins

Statins have been proven to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Despite that, only one third of patients with CKD and ESRD are currently being treated for hyperlipidemia. Possible causes could be lack of evidence of safety of statins in advanced kidney disease or lack of evidence supporting benefit of statins in patients with advanced CKD. [13] Various studies have been done to this effect to evaluate effect of statins on renal function and study their benefits in subjects with renal dysfunction. Statins act by inhibiting 3-hydroxy- 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, an enzyme vital for cholesterol synthesis and this inhibition leads to decreased mevalonate production and serum levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decline. Statins exert anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects by inhibiting mevalonate synthesis, which is a precursor for isoprenoids that are required for cellular pathways essential for inflammation and immune functions. Statins have been shown to decrease levels of tumor necrosis factor-a, interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-β, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, fibronectin mRNA and mesangial proteins [14-16]. In addition statins increase bioavailability of Nitric oxide, which is a potent vasodilator with apparent anti-inflammatory effects [17]. Statins also decrease oxidative stress by impeding oxidation of LDL. This anti-oxidant effect of statins enhances endothelial function [18,19].

Fried et al.performed a meta-analysis of 13 small, prospective clinical trials evaluating effects of anti-hyperlipidemic drugs, mainly statins, on proteinuria, albuminuria and renal function. Lipid therapy was shown to significantly retard the rate of decline in GFR compared to controls [20].

A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study reported the long-term effect of structured versus usual care and effect of statin versus no hypolipidemic drug treatment on estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl). The eligible subjects in this study with established coronary heart disease (CHD) were randomized either into the structured group where they were started on atorvastatin at 10 mg/day starting dose and followed by standard care University clinic or into the usual care group where they were followed by their general practitioners or cardiologists. In the structured care group the dose of atorvastatin was titrated up to 80 mg/day to achieve the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) LDL-C goal (<2.6 mol/liter;1000 mg/liter). In the usual care group subjects were treated according to their physician's standard care which included life style changes, lipid lowering drugs and other necessary drug treatment. Subjects were followed for a mean three year period, with visits every six months. At baseline the subjects in either group had no significant differences in CHD risk factors.

On analysis of the usual care group, 687 subjects not on long term hypolipidemic drug therapy showed a 5.3% mean decline in CrCl(p<0.0001). This was comparable to a mean decline of 4.9% in CrCl in 17 patients in the structured group who discontinued atorvastatin (p=0.02). Forty one subjects in the usual care group who were on simvastatin showed a mean 5.2% increase in CrCl(p=0.002) and 25 subjects on atorvastatin showed a mean increase of 8.1% in CrCl(p=0.0003). Pravastatin and fluvastatin treated subjects showed no statistically significant increase in their CrCl. In the structured group, 783 subjects on atorvastatin showed a mean increase of 12% in CrCl (p<0.0001). This beneficial effect was greatest in those subjects with early renal dysfunction. Figure 1 shows a breakdown of CrCl in either group at baseline and at 48 months. Figure 2 shows the mean percent change in CrCl in either group with or without statin therapy.

nephrology-therapeutics-creatinine-clearance-baseline

Figure 1: Comparison of creatinine clearance (mean values in ml/min) in the structured and usual care groups at baseline and at 48 months. Adapted from Athyros et al. 2004.

nephrology-therapeutics-care-adapted-athyros

Figure 2: Mean change in CrCl in the structured and usual care groups after 48 months. Adapted from Athyros et al. 2004.

In the same study 292 CHD related events were recorded, out of which 196 occurred in subjects on usual care and 96 on patients on atorvastatin. A multivariate analysis of CHD related events in the subjects revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03to 1.21; p=0.01] with each 5% decline in CrCl and a HR of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.29; p<0.001) with each 10% decline in CrCl. In contrast a 5% increase in CrCl showed a HR of 0.84(95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; p=0.003) and a 10% increase in CrCl yielded a HR of 0.73(95% CI, 0.64 to 0.82; p<0.001) for CHD related events.

This study suggests a decline in renal function over a period of three years of follow-up in dyslipidemic patients with CHD who had normal renal function at baseline and were not treated with statins. The study also suggests that statins exert an inhibitory effect on decline in renal function and actually shows an improvement in renal function, as measured by CrCl, in patients treated with statins in the same period. This improvement in renal function also correlates with a lower CHD related event rate with statin therapy [21].

Vidt et al. performed a pooled analysis of data from a population of hyperlipidemic patients enrolled in the rosuvastatin clinical development program to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on renal function. The study group was initially evaluated in shortterm controlled clinical trials which compared efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with other lipid lowering drugs or placebo. Subsequently patients were permitted to participate in an open-label extension trial, where patients received rosuvastatin in the recommended dose range (5-40 mg) for up to 3.8 years. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and GFR, which was obtained from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. The Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was noted to be higher than baseline both early and later in the course of rosuvastatin treatment, with no change seen in placebo group as depicted in Figure 3. This study revealed that the mean GFR after 96 weeks of treatment with rosuvastatin was unchanged or higher when compared with the GFR at baseline irrespective of age, sex, presence of hypertension or diabetes and level of renal function at baseline. Results are depicted in Figure 4.

nephrology-therapeutics-clinical-patients-placebo

Figure 3: Comparison of change in GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) in short –term controlled clinical trials in patients on placebo versus patients on different doses of rosuvastatin. Adapted from Vidt et al. 2004.

nephrology-therapeutics-patients-treatment-rosuvastatin

Figure 4: Comparison of change in GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) in patients on longterm treatment with rosuvastatin. Adapted from Vidt et al. 2004.

The notable finding in this study was absence of a decline in renal function in patients receiving long-term rosuvastatin therapy. Infact a renoprotective effect of rosuvastatin was observed most notably in patient with pre-existing kidney disease. Another observation of this study was a dip-stick positive proteinuria in a small percentage of rosuvastatin-treated patients. This is attributed to a decrease in tubular absorption of albumin as seen with any statin [22].

Strippoli et al. performed a meta-analysis of 50 randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of statins compared with other statins or placebo in CKD. Statins were found to significantly reduce total cholesterol, LDL-C and proteinuria. However the analysis did not support an improvement of GFR with statins. Another significant finding was reduced fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events with statin therapy without any significant effect on all cause mortality. Relatively sparse data and possible reporting bias on outcomes left questions regarding renoprotective effects of statins uncertain [23].

Statins Use in Kidney Transplant Patients

Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplant trial enrolled 2102 renal transplant patients with total cholesterol of 155-348 mg/dl and they were randomly assigned to fluvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg versus placebo and then followed for 5-6 years. Patients in the fluvastatin treatment arm showed a 32% decrease in LDL-C and reduction in the risk for major adverse cardiac events. However there was no improvement seen in the incidence of renal graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine or less deterioration in the GFR over time compared to placebo [24].

Two recent trials that have attempted to provide definitive evidence of a possible renoprotective action and safety of statins in kidney disease are PLANET I (Prospective evaluation of proteinuria and renal function in diabetic patients with progressive renal disease) and PLANET II (Prospective evaluation of proteinuria and renal function in non-diabetic patients with progressive renal disease). PLANET I and PLANET II both aimed to compare effects of rosuvastatin (10 and 40 mg) and atorvastatin (80 mg) on reducing urinary protein excretion, renal function and lipid parameters. The results of these trials were recently reported at the XLVII European Renal Association- European Dialysis and Transplant Association Congress. In PLANET I atorvastatin was found to reduce proteinuria by 15% on top of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy, with no significant effect seen by either dose of rosuvastatin. The results were the same for albuminuria with the two drugs. In PLANET II atorvastatin reduced proteinuria by more than 20% at 26 and 52 weeks, with no significant effect of either dose of rosuvastatin again. Interestingly there was a significant decline of estimated GFR (about 8 ml/min/1.73 m2) noted in PLANET II with rosuvastatin at 40 mg/day dose. No significant difference in the amount of lipid lowering was reported among the treatment groups [25-27].

Recent Research

The Study of heart and renal protection (SHARP) randomized more than 9000 patients to the combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe versus placebo and statin versus placebo. Study results published recently showed that patients allocated to take ezetimibe plus simvastatin had one-sixth fewer major atherosclerotic events, with similar reductions in all types of patients studied. Study showed a large reduction in LDL-C by addition of ezetimibe 10 mg/day to simvastatin 20 mg/day, with no evidence of increased risk for muscle or liver problems. Another trial that merits attention is a study to evaluate the use of rosuvastatin in subjects on regular hemodialysis: an assessment of survival and cardiovascular events (AURORA). This trial randomized 2776 hemodialysis patients to rosuvastatin versus placebo. Rosuvastatin therapy did result in a 43% reduction in LDL-C levels after 3 months of follow-up, but failed to show any significant effect on all cause mortality and on the primary end-point of the study, which was death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Hopefully the results of these two trials may address some of the questions about effect of dyslipidemias on renal function and role of statins in patients with CKD [28-31].

The Treat to New Targets study was undertaken to investigate the effect of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg compared to atorvastatin 10 mg on the risk of future cardiovascular events. The study population included 10,001 eligible men and women, aged 35-75 years with clinically evident CHD. All participants were taken off any lipid-lowering therapy they were on and subject to 1-8 weeks of washout period. Subsequently subjects with LDL-C between 130-250 mg/dl and triglycerides less than 600 mg/dl were entered into an 8 week run-in period with treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg/day. This phase was followed by randomization of subjects with LDL-C less than 130 mg/dl to double-blind therapy with either atorvastatin 80 mg/day or 10 mg/day for upto 6 years.

Occurrence of a major cardiovascular event was the primary efficacy outcome for this study and defined as death from CHD, nonfatal nonprocedure- related myocardial infarction, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or non-fatal stroke. Results showed that patients with CKD were at a significantly greater risk for a major cardiovascular event than patients with normal renal function (Hazard Ratio 1.35; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.54; p<0.0001). Among patients with CKD at baseline, a first major cardiovascular event occurred in 9.3% receiving atorvastatin 80 mg/day compared to 13.4 % in patients receiving atorvastatin 10 mg/day, which translates into a 32% relative risk reduction(p=0.0003). Another important inference from this study was that the rates of treatment-related adverse events and discontinuation rate due to treatment-related adverse effects were similar between patients with CKD and patients with normal estimated glomerular filtration rate, in either treatment group [32,33].

Conclusion

The National Kidney Foundation is urging physicians to consider CKD as a CVD risk equivalent due to an observed progressive increase in CVD risk with worsening kidney disease [34]. Statins have a proven role in reduction of LDL-C and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Their role in decreasing proteinuria and their renoprotective effect is currently under debate. CKD should not preclude use of a statin as recommended by National Lipid Association Statin safety Assessment Task Force. [35] PLANET I and PLANET II support effect of atorvastatin in reducing proteinuria but did not show any beneficial effect on renal function. The trials have raised questions regarding earlier views of class effect with statins as results with rosuvastatin differed from atorvastatin. We still have to await results from the ongoing research to uncover the effect of statins on renal function.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12800
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2011 - Aug 17, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8947
  • PDF downloads : 3853
Top