Received Date: April 18, 2012; Accepted Date: May 14, 2012; Published Date: May 18, 2012
Citation: Eshita Y, Ji RC, Onishi M, Mizuno M, Yoshida J, et al. (2012) Supramolecular Facilities to Melanoma Cells B16F10 with Nanoparticles of a DEAE-Dextran-MMA Copolymer-Paclitaxel Complex. J Nanomed Nanotechol S5:002. doi:10.4172/2157-7439.S5-002
Copyright: © 2012 Eshita Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology
A DEAE-dextran-MMA copolymer (DDMC)–paclitaxel complex was generated using paclitaxel as the guest and DDMC as the host. The resulting nanoparticles were 200-300 nm in diameter and are thought to be useful as an anti-cancer drug delivery system because of forming a stable polymeric micelle in water. The resistance of B16F10 melanoma cells to paclitaxel was confirmed using survival curve analysis. On the other hand, there is no resistance of melanoma cells to DDMC–paclitaxel complex. The DDMC–paclitaxel complex showed superior anti-cancer activity to paclitaxel alone. The cell death rate was determined using Michaelis–Menten Equations, as the complex promoted allosteric supramolecular reaction to tubulin. From our results, the DDMC–paclitaxel complex was not extensively degraded in cells, and achieved good efficacy as an intact supramolecular anti-cancer agent. The DDMC–paclitaxel complex showed high reactivity and specificity of anti-melanoma cells, depending on its supramolecular facilities.
The DDMC/PTX complex will be considered to be not degraded in cells, and represents the efficacy as supramolecular intact such as artificial enzymes having substrate-selective. It should be possible for other anti-cancer agents to offer the amplify effect from this supramolecular complex. These supramolecular facilities to melanoma cells will be very helpful to overcome cancer diseases.
Supramolecular complex; B16F10 melanoma cells; DEAE-dextran-MMA graft copolymer; Paclitaxel; Nanoparticles
Drug delivery systems (DDS) based on polymers are widely used as carriers for targeted drug delivery because of their Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effects  and their avoidance of the Reticulo Endothelial System (RES) [2-3]. Recent studies have provided new insights into the intracellular distribution and efficacy of polymer-based DDS. For example, triple-labeled confocal microscopy of living cells revealed the localization of micelles (i.e., the drug-carrying polymer complex) in several cytoplasmic organelles, including the mitochondria, but not in the nucleus. Moreover, the cellular distribution of the micelle could be altered, and could increase the amount of drug delivered to the cells [4-6].
An exhaustive study of purified saccharose was conducted by the German chemist Dr. Willstatter. The purified enzyme is thought to consist of active groups of low and high molecular weight carriers (1920) . However, the enzyme complex is possible because of the presence of large molecular subunits within the enzyme. Accordingly, supramolecules are now defined as proteins in which the low molecular weight subunit containing the active site is complexed with a high molecular weight carrier.
DEAE-dextran-MMA-copolymer (2-diethylaminoethyl-dextranmethyl methacrylate graft copolymer; DDMC) is a commonly used polymer that is generated by graft polymerization of MMA onto DEAE-dextran in water [8-10]. The resulting DDMC consists of ‘hairy’ nanoparticles with an amphiphilic domain (DEAE-dextran) and a hydrophobic domain (MMA polymer, PMMA) that form a polymer micelle . It has been reported that DDMC is superior to other transfection with safety transfection efficacy by autoclaved as a non-viral carrier for gene introduction [12-18]. On the other hand, the paclitaxel is well known as a strong anticancer agent to introduce cancer cells to apoptosis in stabilization of tubulin (i.e., tubulin polymerization).
Preparation of DDMC
2 g of 2-diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-dextran hydrochloride (nitrogen content 3%) derived from dextran (Mw 500,000) was dissolved in 100 ml of water, followed by the addition of 3.5 ml of Methyl methacrylate (MMA). While stirring, the air in the reaction vessel was fully replaced with N2 gas. Next, 0.1 g of CAN and 15 ml of 0.1N nitric acid was added, and the mixture was stirring for 1 hour at 30°C. Finally, 3 ml of a 1% aqueous solution of hydroquinone was added to stop the reaction, and the resulting DDMC was purified by water dialysis using a cellophane tube to remove any unreacted MMA, ceric salts and nitric acid.
The DDMC–paclitaxel was obtained by adding paclitaxel as a guest to 5 ml of 2% DDMC. Two samples were prepared, contained 0, 0.385 or 0.709 mg/ml paclitaxel. For all two samples, the grafting rate was 102% and DDMC concentration was 9.6 mg/ml.
Characterization of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex
Particle size distribution and the ζ-potential of the DDMC– paclitaxel complex were measured using dynamic light scattering and particle electrophoretic mobility (SZ-100 nanopartica series instrument; HORIBA, Ltd.). Scanning electron microscopy of freezedried DDMC–paclitaxel complex was done using a HITACHI S-4800 (Hitachi). Absorbance of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex in solution was measured at a wavelength of 227 nm and light path of 10 mm using a NanoDrop 200c (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc).
MTT (WST8) assay
Cell survival was determined using MTT assays with water-soluble tetrazolium salts, a series of water soluble dyes suitable for MTT assays. In this method, cells were plated on 96-well tissue culture plates at a density of 10,000 cells/well to ensure that the reach optimal population density was reached within 24–48 hours. Next, the indicated concentrations of DDMC–paclitaxel complex or paclitaxel alone were added to each well, to a final volume of 0.1 ml. The culture medium contained up to 10% fetal bovine serum. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc.) solution was added to each well and the plate was incubated under CO2 at 37°C for 24 or 48 hours. After adding 10 μl of CCK-8 solution to each well, the plate was gently mixed and incubated under CO2 at 37°C for 2–4 hours. The optical density of each well was measured at 450 nm and cell survival was calculated using the following formula:
Cell survival (%) = [(As–Ab)/(Ac–Ab)]×100
Where As = absorbance of the sample, Ac = absorbance of the control well (no cells) and Ab = absorbance of the blank well.
A complex consisting of DDMC and paclitaxel (DDMC– paclitaxel) was generated using a novel antitumor alkaloid paclitaxel as the guest, with DDMC as the host. The particle size distribution and ζ-potential of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex were measured in this study by dynamic light scattering and particle electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Figure 1) was used to determine the size and shape of the freeze-dried DDMC– paclitaxel complex, which revealed the complex formed uniform cubic particles with a diameter of 200–300 nm on dynamic light scattering (Figure 2). Particle size determined by SEM (Figure 1) was 300–500 nm, similar to that determined by dynamic light scattering.
Particle size of 300–500 nm determined by SEM (Figure 1) is thought much larger than real particle size, because DDMC particle form cluster by its association in order to use the freeze-dried sample. Particle size of 200-300 nm at dynamic light scattering shows really particle size.
The value at peck of particle size distribution in this range shows 270 nm.
The ζ-potential of the outer layer of the particles, outside of the electric double layer, was +36 mV, which helps to stabilize the dispersion of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex. Considering that the particle size of DDMC is approximately 100 nm, it seems that the DDMC–paclitaxel complex forms clusters to make stable polymeric micelles .
Only paclitaxel has an absorbance at a wavelength of 227 nm owing its π-electron resonance.
Absorbance of DDMC–paclitaxel complex in solution was measured at a wavelength of 227 nm (light path, 10 mm), which yielded an absorbance coefficient (ε) of 62.4×104 M–1cm–1 . As shown in Figure 3, this is much larger than that of paclitaxel alone, which was 3.27×104 M–1cm–1 in acetone/H2O (50:1), 2.8 ×104 M–1cm–1 in CH3CN:H2O (4:1) and 2.6×104 M–1cm–1 in MeOH:H2O (1:1). This increase in absorbance may be due to the strong photoconductive property of paclitaxel by promoting π-electron resonance, which forms a line dependent on the supramolecular π stack structure of paclitaxel self-integrated into DDMC . These properties may also explain why the DDMC–paclitaxel complex showed high reactivity and specificity for its target substrate in melanoma cells which are known broadly as the most lethal cancer cell.
Survival analysis by MTT assay (WST8)
The results of a direct MTT assay (WST8) showed a positive correlation between cell number and absorbance (i.e., optical density), and the efficacy of paclitaxel on melanoma cells in vitro. Melanoma cells are well known to show resistance to paclitaxel, as indicated in the survival curves shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 with asymptote of P(A) and P(B).
The different concentrations of DDMC–paclitaxel complex or paclitaxel alone were added to each well contenting a culture medium contained up to 10% fetal bovine serum, and the plate was incubated under CO2 at 37°C for 24 or 48 hours. However, survival (%) of both DDMC–paclitaxel complex and paclitaxel alone at 48 hours were lower than one at 24 hours as reported in the Figure 4 and Figure 5, which show the same convex curve of PTX alone that P(A) and P(B) are asymptotic, and a straight line of DDMC-PTX complex following Michaelis–Menten kinetic.
The survival curves, which are inverse to paclitaxel concentrations, indicate that gene expression should be taken into account for the concentration-dependent survival at low paclitaxel concentrations (event A) and is negatively associated with survival at higher concentrations of paclitaxel (event B). In this way, the probability of survival is expressed as the product of the probability of P(A) positively and P(B) negatively, represented as A∩B, where the probability of survival is the product of the probability P(A) and gene expression survival that is positively dependent on low paclitaxel concentrations and the probability P(B) of gene expression survival that is negatively dependent on high paclitaxel concentrations. Thus, the probability A∩B is the phenomenon that events A and B occur in event (A, B). When events A and B are independent of each other, the probability P(A∩B) is represented by the following formula.
P(A∩B) = P(A) · P(B)
Where: P(A∩B) = probability of event A and B; P(A) = the probability of event A and P(B) = the probability of event B. Using this Equation , the convex curve is used to assume that P(A) and P(B) are asymptotic**.
Dr. Miyano of the University of Tokyo has conducted extensive research into the resistance of melanoma cells to paclitaxel (here, event A). The survival of melanoma cells resistant to paclitaxel has been extensively analyzed using DNA microarrays and dynamic Bayesian analyses. In such studies, gene expression was measured for 24 hours after treatment, which showed that gene clustering over time in melanoma cells. These findings obtained from dynamic Bayesian analysis in combination with non-linear regression were confirmed using data from DNA microarrays .
One hour after the administration of paclitaxel, the RBM23 gene, a known target of paclitaxel, acted as a hub and interacted with the TUBA4A gene, which encodes tubulin α-4A chain. Two hours later, TXNIP gene was found to act as a key gene that was not responsive to paclitaxel in the treatment of breast cancer. Four hours later, the DNA microarrays revealed the activation of several genes downstream of EGR1 and TXNIP. Six hours later, CYR61, which is involved in the resistance to paclitaxel in breast cancer, becomes more active and is continued to be influenced by EGR1. In this way, cancer cells exposed to anticancer drugs acquire resistance to the drug over time, and show complex cellular behaviors.
In this experiment, it can be explained using factor analysis to examine the effects of low paclitaxel concentrations on survival and gene expression of melanoma cells. However, we considered that paclitaxel was unlikely not to participate in stabilization of tubulin (i.e., tubulin polymerization), even at low paclitaxel concentrations. At high concentrations, however, the enhanced tubulin polymerization will be progress, unable to inhibit the responses to paclitaxel. Therefore, the reduced survival dependent on paclitaxel concentrations (i.e., event B) becomes dominant and the efficacy of paclitaxel becomes more apparent.
By contrast, the responses of melanoma cells to the DDMC– paclitaxel complex are much more specific without event A. Of note, low concentrations of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex markedly inhibited the increase in number of melanoma cells, with a linear negative correlation between paclitaxel concentration [E]0 and survival rate. This means there are no these resistances of melanoma cells to DDMC–paclitaxel complex.
In other words, the relationship between the cell death (Cd) rate (Cd/dt) and tubulin polymerization (P) rate (dp/dt) will assume the following Equation, as modified from Cheng and Prusoff :
Cd/dt = a dp/dt + C1 (1)
Where, a is a constant and C1 is a device constant corresponding to a>0, C1>0. The rate of tubulin polymerization V=dp/dt can also be expressed using a Michaelis–Menten Equation derived its S-shaped curve, as follows
Where Km = Michaelis constant, [S]0 = initial tubulin concentration and n = Hill coefficient. In this case, because n>1, mutual interactions between numerous points occur, which fit an S-shaped curve. The stability of the enzyme–substrate complex is shown as 1/Km, and larger for DDMC–paclitaxel than for paclitaxel alone, corresponding to [S]0 n >> Km. The Equation
can be substituted with the expression from (1), as follows:
Cd/dt=aκcat[E]0 + C1 (4)
and integrated into:
Cd=aκcat[E]0 t + C1t (5)
From this, the rate of tubulin polymerization V can be express using enzymatic parameters for Cd. In these Equations, [E]0 = initial paclitaxel concentration as an enzyme.
In Figure 6, incubation with MTT for 24 and 48 hours yielded the following Equation:
Cd = 0.1156[E]0 + 0.1082 (6)
Cd =0.1062[E]0 + 0.0481 (7)
Thus, 0.1082 and 0.0481 represent the constants for [E]0 at 24 and 48 hours, respectively.
From Equation (5), the plots of C1t with time t must be extrapolated to 0 at t = 0. Accordingly, when C1t = 0.1082 at 24 hours and 0.0481 at 48 hours are plotted, it can be almost extrapolated to 0 at time t = 0 from Figure 7. This confirms the assumption in Equation (5) that the relationship between [E]0 for paclitaxel and the probability of Cd forms a straight line. From these results and based on V=dp/ dt, the DDMC–paclitaxel complex promotes enzymically tubulin polymerization that can be expressed using Michaelis–Menten kinetics added the Hill coefficient . These phenomena also demonstrate the supramolecular properties of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex.
Allosterical enzymatic reactions
The results also indicate that these enzymatic reactions allosterically promote tubulin polymerization in cells. Hydrophobic interactions between the polymer and substrate, with paclitaxel located in socalled the hydrophobic pocket, allow paclitaxel to selectively react with tubulin as indicated in Figure 8.
This effect is not apparent with paclitaxel alone, and is less susceptible to interference from other signals. The results also provide evidence that the DMC–paclitaxel complex causes a supramolecular reaction involving allosteric promotion, as in Equation (2). The Hill coefficient included in Equation (2) supports the likelihood of allosteric cooperation as it represents the strength of cooperative molecular joints. These phenomena may depend on the supramolecular characteristics of clathrate compounds as the paclitaxel guest is complexed with DDMC as the host. Therefore, the DDMC–paclitaxel complex shows marked substrate specificity, consistent with artificial enzymes.
This substrate specificity of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex promotes enzymically a reaction between paclitaxel and tubulin, the target of paclitaxel, and avoids potential interference from changes in gene expression that may affect the survival response to paclitaxel, even at low concentrations.
Paclitaxel can be conjugated to a variety of carriers, including polyglutamate and albumin, or encapsulated in cationic liposomes. Using these carriers, paclitaxel is thought to be transported into and released directly in cells, thus improving its efficacy. However, the DDMC–paclitaxel complex is not degraded in the cell, and its efficacy may be enhanced by remaining in supramolecular form.
Thermo dynamic consideration of supramolecular allosteric binding
Supramolecular allosteric binding, such as binding of molecular oxygen to hemoglobin, is a phenomenon that increases the reactivity of the active site and other substrate binding site. For hemoglobin, oxygen acts as an effector and as the substrate. Binding of the molecule to the allosteric binding site on one subunit enhances the affinity of the other binding sites by inducing structural changes. Thus, the allosteric properties of these supramolecules resemble those of enzyme–substrate interactions.
In the case of enzyme-substrate interactions with DDMC–paclitaxel complex to melanoma cells B16F10, the allosteric properties from supramolecules may yield entropy decreases (entropy trap) depending on the selectively react with tubulin and the strain of substrate under its stress from molecular structure as indicated in Figure 8.
At same time, an enthalpy decreases yield depending on adhesion of substrate by supramolecules structure of DDMC–paclitaxel complex.
Paclitaxel is an anticancer agent that was originally isolated from the bark of the yew that promotes tubulin polymerization and inhibits β-tubulin depolymerization. The DDMC–paclitaxel complex is formed by self-assembly and aggregation owing to the supramolecular π stack as shown in Figure 3, forming particles of approximately 270 nm in size. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between the cationic DDMC–paclitaxel complex and its substrate, the α,β-tubulin dimer, orientate β-tubulin with the hydrophobic pocket of the DDMC– paclitaxel complex, which promotes to polymerize the α, β-tubulin dimer through the activity sight of paclitaxel consistent with Michaelis– Menten kinetics. The stability of the enzyme (DDMC–paclitaxel)– substrate (α, β-tubulin dimer) complex (Michaelis complex) can be represented as 1/Km, although is probably very large, it cause dynamic instability in the tubulin dimers to stop the Treadmill of tubulin Protomers. This α, β-tubulin dimer and DDMC–paclitaxel complex also contain Mg2+ and GTP on the leading edge, which may also be involved in tubulin polymerization, as follows:
nTaTb + GTP + Mg2+ + DDMC–paclitaxel → Complex → (TaTb)n + GDP + Mg2+ + DDMC-paclitaxel (8)
Where TaTb is the α, β-tubulin dimer.
The catalytic power of enzymes to efficiently form transition states has been proposed to involve an equilibrium between the Michaelis complex and a stabilized transition state.
Gibbs free energy in the transition state is considered.
ΔGキ=ΔHキ - TΔSキ (9)
Where, ΔGキ means free energy of activation, ΔSキ means entropy of activation, and ΔHキ also means enthalpy of activation.
Figure 9 shows potential energy curve and activation energy Ea.
Where, Ea ΔHキ.
With paclitaxel, many signals from gene expression in melanoma cells yield a huge ΔGキ owing to large ΔSキ and large ΔHキ as in Figure 4C.
As R ∝ eΔHキ/RT with apoptosis for melanoma cell(R), melanoma cell can overcome paclitaxel in a low concentration.
On the other hands, Figure 9 shows small activation energy Ea′ with DDMC-paclitaxel complex, and the enzyme facility from supramolecule yield a small ΔGキ owing to low ΔSキ and low ΔHキ, that is why apoptosis for melanoma cell(R) should be progress.
As shown in Figure 8, the α-tubulin side is a negative edge, and the β-tubulin side is a positive edge.
During polymerization, both the α- and β-subunits of the tubulin dimer are bound to a molecule of GTP. Much microtubule places a negative edge in Microtubule Organizing Center (MTOC), centrosome in the animal cell, to extend the (+) growth edge to each place of the cell. Of course, the other microtubules formed outside of centrosome are searched and transported to MTOC that is associated to unification . In one embodiment, the tubulin-binding agent is a microtubule stabilizing agent.
Cell division is usually initiated when polymerization ceases to form the sufficient long hollow tube to provide support for myosin and actin located on the cell surface by gathering its 13 fibers. The DDMC– paclitaxel complex stabilizes the α,β-tubulin dimer, which is therefore unable to stop polymerization, promoting cell apoptosis following the formation of numerous poor-quality short hollow tubes. Figure 10 shows the diffusion of paclitaxel to the outer surface, the coordination of α,β-tubulin dimmer on the DDMC/PTX complex, and subsequent growth of the α,β-tubulin dimer on the DDMC/PTX complex. This reaction may be accelerated by the orientation of the α,β-tubulin dimer to paclitaxel within the hydrophobic pocket of the DDMC–paclitaxel complex. The resulting polymerization should be coordinated by both the growing end of the α,β-tubulin polymer and the α, β-tubulin dimer on a supramolecular template, and one-dimensional Brownian motion is accompanied by electrostatic interactions with the DDMC–paclitaxel complex. This coordination polymerization will proceed as a result of Brownian motion .
When P (A): ax and P (B): b (1-x), (A∩B) is shown as y= (ax) (b (1-x)).
The secondary function (convex curve) of y= (ax) (b (1-x)) makes both y=ax and y=b (1-x)
an asymptote in a range of a>0, b>0 and 1>x>0.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
A portion of this research was carried out with the support of a Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare Scientific Research Grant (H18-Shinko- Ippan-009, H20-Shinko-Ippan-015, H23-Shinko-Ippan-015) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Grant (Basic C 18580310, Basic C 23590803, Basic B Overseas Science 20401050).