alexa The Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of H5N1, H1N1 and H7N9 | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-105X
Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

The Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of H5N1, H1N1 and H7N9

Jiaxian Ou1, Shuihua Lu2, Bo Wu3, Chunxue Bai1 and Yuanlin Song*1,2,3

1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Qingpu Branch, and Shanghai Public Health , China

2Clinical Center, Fudan University, China

3Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute, China

*Corresponding Author:
Yuanlin Song, M.D
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital
Qingpu Brach, and Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
Fudan University, Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute
180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 20032, China
Tel: 86-21-64041990-2422
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 02, 2013; Accepted date: July 04, 2013; Published date: July 08, 2013

Citation: Ou J, Lu S, Wu B, Bai C, Song Y (2013) The Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of H5N1, H1N1 and H7N9. J Pulm Respir Med 3:e129. doi:10.4172/2161-105X.1000e129

Copyright: © 2013 Ou J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine

On March 31, 2013, a novel avian viral (H7N9) infection was identified in Shanghai with fatal outcome [1]. Till May 10, 2013, 111 laboratory-confirmed H7N9 cases had been reported in Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Anhui, Henan and Beijing [2]; amongst which 27.0% had died [3]. It reminded the public of precedent H5N1 and H1N1 pandemics which had swept across the globe with substantial infection and mortality. In 1997, H5N1 pandemic was first proclaimed with 18 infections and 6 related deaths in Hong Kong [4,5]. It was gradually resolved to sporadicity via depopulation of birds and poultry but broke out yet again in 2003 to cause 424 confirmed cases and 261 deaths as of May 15, 2009 [5]. H1N1, a product of multiple assortments between avian, swine and human influenza viruses, initiated another pandemic in Mexico in 2009 which spread across the globe and resulted in 11034 cases and 85 deaths in 41 countries as of May 21, 2009 [6].

H5N1, H1N1 and the novel H7N9 are type A influenza viruses belonging to the RNA viral family Orthomyxoviridae. Unlike types B and C of the family, type A presents rapid evolution and variations in antigenicity, pathogenicity and host specificity capable of avian and mammalian infections. According to the antigenicity of Hemagglutinin (HA) and Neuraminidase (NA) molecules, type A viruses are subdivided into 16 HA subtypes (H1-H16) and 9 NA subtypes (N1-N9). Generally sporadic, introduction of a novel HA subtype in the human population through genetic reassortment or inter-species transmission may initiate an influenza pandemic. An infected individual may develop contagious respiratory conditions of influenza characterized by high fever, cough, headache, malaise and inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tract. In severe cases, complications such as pneumonia, hemorrhagic bronchitis, multiorgan dysfunction, central nervous system involvement and death may result. Specifically, H5N1 viruses replicate mainly in the lower respiratory tract [7,8] and disease severity correlates directly with viral load to cause severe pneumonia, lymphopenia, hypercytokinemia and hyperchemokinemia [7-12]. Pulmonary manifestation of H1N1 infection varies between febrile upper respiratory tract infection, fulminant primary viral pneumonia and secondary bacterial pneumonia with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The novel H7N9 infection, similarly, has been observed with fulminant pneumonia, respiratory failure and ARDS [9]. Among H1N1 and H7N9, rhabdomyolysis and encephalopathy, at midst other extrapulmonary manifestation, have been reported [13-15].

While clinical manifestation serves as a means of tentative diagnosis, confirmative tests should be implemented to differentiate the possibilities of other viral or bacterial infections. Basically, they include viral isolation, serological tests, rapid antigen tests and molecular tests [16-19], each possessing unique strengths and weaknesses. Viral isolation is the gold standard for diagnosis and takes advantage of viral replication in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells or other media to isolate viruses. Its application in routine diagnosis remains limited as an average input of 2-3 days in a biosafety level 3 laboratory is necessary to perform the propagation. In the preliminary discovery of H7N9, throat-swab specimens from suspected patients were propagated in the allantoic sac and amniotic cavity of 9-to-11-day old specific pathogen-free embryonated chicken eggs to isolate the pathogen [13]. Serological tests detect antibody response of a suspected patient which take days to develop but remain undetectable in fulminant cases. Rapid antigen tests, on the other hand, are commercialized antibody kits that detect influenza antigens within 20 minutes at high costs with little information about subtypes. Nonetheless, rapid antigen tests for H1, H3 and avian H5 subtypes have been developed despite a need for improved performance [20]. Comparatively speaking, molecular tests are the most sensitive and efficient diagnostic tools that confirm the presence of influenza viruses through amplification of target nucleic acids. They include reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), real-time RT-PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), microarray and pyrosequencing. RTPCR and real-time RT-PCR are similar techniques, the latter yielding quantitative results, which detect the highly conserved M gene of type A influenza viruses and conserved regions of its HA gene. In spite of high start-up costs, real-time RT-PCR is widely utilized as first-line identification of influenza viruses due to its (i) readily available primer sequences; (ii) high sensitivity; (iii) quantitative results suggestive of prognostic significance. Currently, commercialized real-time RT-PCR assays have been developed for laboratory diagnoses of H5N1 and H1N1. In the discovery of H7N9, RNA was first extracted from throatswab samples of suspected patients to perform RT-PCR for seasonal influenza viruses (H1, H3 or B), H5N1, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and novel coronavirus. When such options were eliminated, self-designed primer and probe sets for H1 to H16 and N1 to N9 subtypes were used to identify viral subtypes [13].

Together with Neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir), adamantanes (amantadine, rimantadine), acting via M2 ion channel inhibition, serve as antiviral treatment against influenza viruses. In treating H5N1, adamantanes were found to be primarily resisted in Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. In view of such, oseltamivir was recommended as first-line treatment while oseltamivir phosphate or zanamivir as prophylaxis [21]. Nevertheless, 2 of 7 H5N1 patients in Vietnam had displayed signs of oseltamivir resistance during treatment, suggesting considerable resistance rates of the drug [22]. Furthermore, clinical experience has denied the survival advantage of oseltamivir and its efficacy has not been verified [8,10,23-25]. While delayed treatment could be partly blamed, late preliminary drug administration should not be discouraged because pharyngeal viral loads were found to be undetectable among surviving patients after drug usage in small case series [22]. In treating H1N1, NA inhibitors failed to present survival advantage but its early administration was associated with reduced likelihood of severe clinical outcomes [26]. Alarmingly, a significant increase in oseltamivir-resistant H1N1 viruses have been reported globally, probably as a result of prolonged infection among immunocompromised patients [27,28]. To guide the choice of therapy, neuraminidase inhibition assays may be performed to detect suspected antiviral resistance mutations. However, as the tests can only be carried out on viral cultures while certain virus mutants may be selectively enriched via viral propagation in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, authenticity is questionable. Currently, limited experience remains when laboratory studies have verified sensitivity of H7N9 to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) and resistance against amantadine and rimantadine [29-31].

In summary, the aforementioned influenza pandemics have taught us valuable lessons in diagnostics and public health management. They have reminded us the importance of preparation for upcoming influenza pandemics which may strike anytime and anywhere at any degrees. It is thus our liability to equip with relevant knowledge and react quickly towards such crises when they next prevail.

This study was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Committee key grant 11411951102 and 12JC1402300, and National Natural Science Foundation grant 81170056 and Easter Scholar Program supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Committee.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11754
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2013 - Oct 17, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7966
  • PDF downloads :3788
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords