alexa The Role of Steroid Receptors and HER2 in Ovarian Cancer | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-2518
Journal of Carcinogenesis & Mutagenesis
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

The Role of Steroid Receptors and HER2 in Ovarian Cancer

Maria Carolina de Toledo and Amilcar Barreta*

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas – UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Amilcar Barreta
PO Box 6111 State University of Campinas
UNICAMP, Zip Code 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Tel: +55 19 991198210
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 10, 2013; Accepted date: January 22, 2014; Published date: January 27, 2014

Citation: de Toledo MC, Barreta A (2014) The Role of Steroid Receptors and HER2 in Ovarian Cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen 5:158. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.1000158

Copyright: © 2014 de Toledo MC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Carcinogenesis & Mutagenesis

Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal female malignancies. Despite of all the efforts in surgery and chemotherapy, advanced disease, which is the majority of the cases at the time of diagnosis, is associated with poor survival [1]. Besides, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a disease with great heterogeneity; so, the determination of individual tumor characteristics can be associated with different clinical behavior and may have impact on treatment and prognosis.

Tumor cells do interact with the environment around them [2]. In recent years, with the development of the molecular biology and immunologic methods, molecules such as the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), and the steroid receptors, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR), have been tested as potential biomarkers of individualized clinical behavior of cancer.

The effect of steroid hormones in carcinogenesis has been studied specially for breast and endometrial cancer with well-known and promising results for therapy. However for ovarian cancer these results have been conflicting and unclear [3,4]. While the expression of PR has been shown to predict better prognosis with apoptotic effect [5], a positive ER status has shown discrepant results [6-8]depending on the subtype of ER and tumor type [9]. In recurrent low-grade carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum, hormonal therapies had a greater anti-tumor activity in ER+/PR+ patients than in ER+/PR- patients; although it was not statistical significant [10].The status of the AR and HER2 in ovarian cancer has also showed unclear results. Bookman and colleagues described a limited clinical value of trastuzumab in recurrent ovarian cancer because of the low frequency of HER2 overexpression [11-14]. Also at study, the subgroup of “triple negative epithelial ovarian cancer” (TNEOC), i.e., tumors that do not express ER (subtype alpha-ER), PR and HER2, may be significantly more aggressive and display a poorer prognosis than non-TNEOC tumors [15], similarly as evidenced in studies for breast cancer [16]. A recent review and meta-analysis of behavior found that PR predicted favorable survival, while HER2 expression had a negative effect on survival. ER expression remains controversial suggesting a protector effect especially of ERβ expression which data was limited by the sample size [17]. Although all this conflicting data is true to some extent it is important to emphasize that most ovarian cancer biomarker studies are not subtype specific and this can lead to misleading results [18]. In 2013, Sieh and colleagues published a collaborative study with 2933 women and analyzed hormonal-receptor expression by tumor subtype and ovarian cancer survival. They found that PR positivity was associated with disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma and high-grade serous carcinoma and ER positivity was associated with disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma. No significant associations were found for mucinous, clear-cell or low-grade serous carcinoma [19].

Recently our group published a study which analyzed the contribution of the expression of ER (α and β), PR, AR and HER2 and “triple-negative” tumor status to disease-free and overall survival in 152 women with epithelial ovarian cancer [20]. Our results showed that women with ERα positivity had a greater disease free-survival but had no effect on overall survival. However, this result was not subtypespecific and hormonal expression in these patients should be analyzed by tumor subtype as Sieh did for clearer results. The previous reported findings about TNEOC were not observed at our study, so those controversies still persist.

In conclusion, ovarian cancer subtypes are different diseases. These differences lead to heterogeneous responses to treatment. So, biomarker studies should be stratified by subtype to establish whether hormone-receptor status predicts behavior in EOC, and whether it could guide to personalised treatment for ovarian cancer, such as endocrine treatment.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11698
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2014 - Oct 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7916
  • PDF downloads :3782
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords