alexa When Pharma Meets Nano or The Emerging Era of Nano-Pharmaceuticals | Open Access Journals
ISSN : 2153-2435
Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

When Pharma Meets Nano or The Emerging Era of Nano-Pharmaceuticals

Farid Menaa*

Director, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nano-Medicine, Fluorotronics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Farid Menaa
Director, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nano-Medicine
Fluorotronics, Inc.
San Diego, California, USA
Tel: (+1) 858-274-2728
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 01, 2013; Accepted date: April 20, 2013; Published date: April 25, 2013

Citation: Menaa F (2013) When Pharma Meets Nano or The Emerging Era of Nano-Pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceut Anal Acta 4:223. doi: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000223

Copyright: © 2013 Menaa F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta

Pharmaceutical formulations that contain nano-sized drugs are perceived as “Nano-pharmaceuticals” or “Nano-theranostics” (i.e. billionth meter compounds potentially useful for diagnostics and therapeutics). The pharmaceutics/theranostics loaded into nanoparticles (NPs) can offer significant benefit for the patient compared to the conventional formulated drugs (i.e. drugs in their bulk-/free-form). Nevertheless, if the NPs are: (i) inappropriately prepared (e.g. inadequate surface properties); (ii) inaccurately dosed for in vivo delivery; (iii) environmentally uncontrolled/unmanaged and so, allow accidental or involuntary contact (e.g. skin exposure, inhalation, ingestion during the NPs production or use), they might then cause serious illnesses/health hazards like cardio-vascular diseases, neurological disorders [1-3] as well as other effects similar to that reported with asbestos such as mesothelioma and other lungrelated conditions (e.g. granuloma formation, interstitial inflammation, lung cancers) [3-5].

In fact, it is important to know not only about the effect of NPs in a given body (e.g. human) but also have a clear picture about how this body is answering to the intrusion of NPs. This shall facilitate and strengthener our data interpretations about the efficacy and safety of the entity (e.g. drug compound) they contain. For instance, while an increasing number of studies are highlighting the biodistribution of NPs, little is known about their specific fate (e.g. spatial and functional bio-persistence due to heterogeneous particle size issue?). In other words, the exact in vivo mechanisms of their relative deposition and clearance (e.g. phagocytosis by macrophages, excretion systems, and/or endocytosis by epithelial and endothelial cells?) remain unclear.

Therefore, there is still a lot to do for better understanding the healthy and safety issues related to the development and use of NPs (e.g. toxicity/dangers, fate: biodistribution and bioavailability/clearance) as well as for enhancing the public prevention/awareness (e.g. by sparing information and stimulating individual´s consciousness).

NPs, ideally between 5-200 nm, is a large family of various nanopolymers (e.g. different shapes and surface properties) that includes, but not limited to, lipid-based nano-molecules (e.g. liposomes, solid lipid NPs (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC)) [6], carbon nanotubes (e.g. single-walled or multi-walled-CNTs) [7,8], fullerenes (i.e. C60) other than CNTs [9,10], quantum dots (e.g. semi-conductor QDs) [11-13], diamondoids (e.g. adamantine, memantine) [14,15], gold NPs (AuNPs) [16] and silver NPs (AgNPs) [17].

A number of emerging studies showed that NP therapeutic formulations (e.g. encapsulation of natural, semi-synthetic, synthetic compounds such as anti-cancer drugs, polyphenols, bio-therapeutics like peptides, proteins, nucleic acids) present several advantages. Indeed, the features of nano-theranostics are relatively broad in terms of efficacy and safety, and include: (i) enhanced solubility and dissolution rate; (ii) enhanced local or systemic bioavailability; (iii) improved dose proportionality; (iv) reduced adverse effects (i.e. usually safer and less toxic, often because of minimal applied concentration); (v) enhanced controlled-site targeting; (vi) progressive release of the loaded drug into blood, targeted tissues such as tumors as well as specific individual cell; (vii) suitability for administration by all routes (e.g. oral, trans-dermal/ topical, intravenous); (viii) stability against possible enzymatic-, cellular-, thermal- and/or photo-degradation(s); (ix) relatively high bio-compatibility; (x) possibility of sterile filtration due to decreased particle size range.

Besides, the fluorinations of NPs, not only with radio-isotopes or fluorescent dies, which are respectively toxic or unstable, but preferentially with Carbon-Fluorine (C-F) or other label-free/green methods, may further overcome several limitations (e.g. toxicity, safety, security, efficacy) [18]. Several techniques are available to characterize NPs such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), spectroscopy-derived techniques (Carbon-Fluorine spectroscopy (CFS) aka Spectro-Fluor™, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy) [13,18,19]. Further, it is possible to: (i) excite and deliver NPs at a specific location (e.g. tumor site) with technologies such as fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) [20]; (ii) localize NPs in tissues with technologies such as regular energy fluorescence [11,12], clinical molecular imaging such as positron emission tomography (PET) [14] or CFS [18]. Constant technological innovation shall permit the achievement of milestones/ breakthrough discoveries regarding the spatio-temporal, physicochemical and functional characterizations of NPs.

Nowadays, several nano-pharmaceuticals are successfully marketed. Different patented techniques are commercialized to prepare nanopharmaceuticals such as milling, homogenization and precipitation. In all cases, particular attention shall be given on purity (e.g. minimization of immunogenicity), size (e.g. ability to reach any tiny locations in the body with minimal toxicity such as ultra-passing blood-brain barrier), shape (e.g. minimization of aggregation and blood flow-related problems), and “functionalization” of NPs (e.g. possible requirement to modify the surface properties such as polarity to ensure water-solubility and enhance NPs bio-availability - This can be achieved by specific coating; other modifications can be done to control the binding and release of the loaded theranostic at a targeted location – This can be done by adding a functional moiety at the surface of NPs).

However, one should keep in mind that a given NP (e.g. especially inert, apolar and hydrophobic such as carbon nanotubes, gold and silver NPs), even pure enough, might cause harmful health effects and naturally be or become a double-edged sword if appropriate precautions are not fully taken during the design, the development process, the storage and the testing. Indeed, improper NPs can cause inflammatory-state diseases through the recruitment of specific immune cells (e.g. macrophages), liberation of pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. interleukins, chemokines, cytokines), and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which subsequently could cause lipid hyper-peroxidation of normal/healthy cells and tissue burden [21]. The potential deleterious health effects (e.g. cytotoxicity, inflammogenicity, fibrogenicity, tissue burden) of NPs are relative and may depend on, but not limited to:

(i) their physical-chemical characteristics (e.g. surface properties such as their carried charge densities in contact with the cell membranes and/or their chemical reactivity; flexibility or rigidity); (ii) their size (e.g. < 4 nm or > 20 nm); (iii) their shape (e.g. spherical, fiber-like); (iv) the mode of administration (e. oral, topical, intraveinous) (iv) their administrated/inhalated dose; (v) their accumulated dose (i.e. risk of overload); (vi) the body micro-environment they reached (i.e. biodistribution/deposition); (vii) their exposure time at a specific location (i.e. bioavailability/bio-persistence/clearance capacity); (viii) their biocompatibility; (ix) their interactions with the body´s microenvironment; (x) the body´s heath status and its relative capacities to deal with NPs, which could be tissue-specific.

For instance, while AuNP is quite interesting for applications in oncology (e.g. cancer treatment) [22] and gerontology (e.g. treatment of Alzheimer´s disease) [23] - in particular because of its ability to be thermally excited -, it remains however limited by its inert character and its natural hydrophobicity, which both lower its biodistribution and enhance the body immune-induced toxicity [24,25]. Indeed, highest cytotoxicity has been observed when AuNPs were smaller than 4 nm both in cancerous and healthy cells [26]. Interestingly, PEG-modified gold nanorods were cleared at a high rate clearance (77%) within five hours following in vivo administration [27]. Conversely, it was reported that nano-diamonds (NDs) exhibited the lowest toxicity compared to that of other carbon nanomaterials mostly because of their effective removal by macrophages [28] (i.e. phagocytosis) and excretory systems/ clearance mechanisms [29].

Overall, chronic administration/application/inhalation of one or a combination of these parameters such as high concentration, smallest, polycationic, highly flexible, branched nanofiber-like NPs at a specific body location, is more likely to cause higher cytotoxicity/low biocompatibility compared to that single or combined criteria such as acute contact, low dose, large, poorly cationic, rigid, globular-like NPs at the same specific body location (Menaa et al., data not shown).

Hence, to minimize the cytoxicity and possible associated poor clinical outcomes induced by remaining NPs, there is a need to ensure their high functionalization (e.g. surface modification) in a preadministration setting as well as an efficient NPs bio-filtration in a postadministration setting. Fortunately, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is highly considering the inclusion of toxicology aspects for manufactured NPs [30].

Eventually, the future of nano-theranostic applications is bright and brings hope for more successful and safer treatments both to the patients and health care professionals. Nevertheless, more studies that aim to clearly assessing the in vivo biodistribution, the metabolism (i.e. bioavailability) and toxicity of each type of NPs, which shall be possibly homogeneous, are definitively required in addition to the entity (e.g. drug compound) they might contain. I also think that an international common policy agreement (i.e. including with developing countries) to validate the commercialization of nano-theranostics (e.g. including e-business) is requested. In these regards, may I already suggest the name of “nanopharmacokinetics” and “nanopharmacovigilance” for nano-drugs, by analogy to “pharmaco-kinetics” and “pharmacovigilance” which are respectively attributed to bulk-drugs formulation?

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11606
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2013 - Oct 19, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7833
  • PDF downloads :3773
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]line.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords