| Study |
Aim of Comparison |
HVLT total recall performance |
| AUC |
Optimal Cut-off |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
| (95% CI) |
| Brandt et al. [6] |
NCI vs Amnesic & Dementia |
|
19/20 |
0.94 |
1 |
| Frank et al. [9] |
NCI VS mild Dementia |
- |
18 |
0.96 |
0.8 |
| Hogervorst et al. [8] |
NCI VS Dementia |
0.97 |
14.5 |
0.87 |
0.98 |
| (0.95-0.99) |
19.5 |
0.95 |
0.77 |
| De Jager et al. [10] |
NCI VS MCI VS AD VS CVD |
0.88 |
15.5 (MCI VS AD) |
0.91 |
0.69 |
| 0.84 |
14.5 (CVD VS AD) |
0.82 |
0.75 |
| Kuslansky et al. [12] |
NCI VS Dementia |
0.89 |
<16 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
| Schrijnemaekers et al. [11] |
NCI VS MCI VS AD |
|
24.5 (NCI VS MCI) |
0.82 |
0.79 |
| 16.5 (MCI VS AD) |
0.79 |
0.96 |
| De Jager et al. [13] |
NCI VS MCI |
0.9 |
25.5 |
0.79 |
0.95 |
| Shi et al. [14] |
NCI VS MCI VS Dementia |
0.98 |
15.5 (NCI vs Dementia) |
0.95 |
0.93 |
| 0.79 |
21.5 (NCI vs MCI) |
0.69 |
0.71 |
| Gonza´lez-Palau et al. [15] |
NCI VS AD |
0.95 |
13 |
0.96 |
0.85 |
| (0.92-0.98) |
| 0.77 |
12.5 (AD VS HD) |
0.97 |
0.52 |
| (0.65-0.89) |
| Aretouli et al. [16] |
AD VS HD VS PD |
0.64 |
12.5 (AD VS PD) |
0.72 |
0.52 |
| (0.48-0.80) |
| 0.66 |
13.5 (PD VS HD) |
0.87 |
0.44 |
| (0.49-0.83) |
|
