seabream larvae to various test diets after 36 days

Growth parameter	Treatments
Growth parameter	C1	C2	C3	E1	E2	CE1	CE2	HUFA	Control
WG¹	0.20±0.01	0.25±0.07	0.23±0.01	0.22±0.04	0.24±0.04	022±0.06	0.20±0.04	0.22±0.03	0.28±0.06
SGR²	6.61± 0.76^a	6.4± 0.72^a	7.16± 1.04^a	6.73± 0.7^a	6.93± 0.95^a	6± 0.6^a	7.16± 1.1^a	6.63± 1.18^a	7.23± 0.68^a
DGI³	0.55± 0.11	0.76± 0.09	0.69± 0.15	0.65± 0.09	0.72 ± 0.14	0.65± 0.14	0.56± 0.12	0.65± 0.13	0.65± 0.38
CF⁴	1.61± 0.29	1.75± 0.22	1.71± 0.19	1.55± 0.22	1.7± 0.21	1.66± 0.21	1.57± 0.17	1.6± 0.29	1.69± 0.16

*Mean ± SD of three replicates. Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). 1-Weight gain 2-Specific growth rate, 3-Daily growth index, 4-Condition factor; C1, C2, C3: larvae fed with HUFA + 5%, 10% and 15%(w/w) vitamin C-enriched artemia nauplii; E1, E2: larvae fed with HUFA + 5% and 10% (w/w) vitamin E-enriched Artemia nauplii; CE1, CE2: larvae fed with HUFA + 2.5% and 5% (W/W) vitamin C and E enriched artemia nauplii respectively; HUFA: larvae fed with HUFA without vitamin; Control: larvae fed with non-enriched artemia.

Table 3: Response of seabream larvae to various test diets after 36 days of feeding*.

Goto home»