| |
Total
(n=186) |
Experiences during screening:
Quality of care received rated as good-to-excellent |
96.2% |
| Felt treated with dignity and respect |
98.4% |
| Was not subjected to more tests/procedures than necessary |
97.9% |
| Did not feel treated as a guinea pig during screening |
98.9% |
| Was given enough time to talk with the person who conducted the screening |
97.9% |
| Felt that questions were answered to satisfaction |
98.9% |
| Felt a great deal comfortable with the person who conducted the screening |
78.0% |
| Felt they could trust the person who conducted the screening a great deal |
67.2% |
Understanding of HAMS:
Felt they understood the screening process very well |
86.6% |
| Understood very well what HAMS are usually trying to study |
81.2% |
| Understood very well what they have to do if they joined a clinical trial |
84.4% |
Future enrollment and recommendations:
Very willing to get screened again for an HAMS |
80.1% |
| Would recommend a close friend living with HIV to get screened for an HAMS at the site where they last got screened |
98.4% |
| Would recommend a family member living with HIV to get screened for an HAMS where they last got screened† |
96.2% |
† Response missing for three participants.