Previous Page  13 / 18 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 18 Next Page
Page Background

Page 62

Notes:

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology | ISSN: 0974-7230 | Volume: 11

&

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

Big Data Analytics & Data Mining

7

th

International Conference on

7

th

International Conference on

September 26-27, 2018 | Chicago, USA

Radiomic magnetic resonance imaging signature reveals three distinct subtypes of glioblastoma with

different clinical and molecular characteristics, offering prognostic value beyond IDH1 mutation status

Saima Rathore

University of Pennsylvania, USA

D

espite variable proliferation and significant molecular, histological and imaging heterogeneity across and within patients, the

standard-of-care for glioblastoma patients is notably uniform. Non-invasive characterization of this heterogeneity may be useful

in personalized treatment planning. We hypothesized that pattern analysis methods applied to clinically-acquired multi-parametric

magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) sequences would be able to identify complex and otherwise visually not easily appreciable

imaging subtypes of glioblastoma that relate to prognosis and underlying molecular characteristics of the tumor. The imaging profiles

of preoperative mpMRIs (T1, T1-Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR, DSC, DTI) of de novo glioblastoma patients were summarized by advanced

radiomic features, including volumetric, shape, texture, statistical and histogram features. A completely unsupervised clustering

method of K-Means was employed to dissect phenotypic heterogeneity, without any a-priori knowledge or target of molecular and

clinical characteristics. The model was developed/cross-validated in a discovery cohort (n=208) and subsequently evaluated in a

replication cohort (n=53), for which IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status were known. Clustering revealed three distinct/

reproducible radiographic subtypes of glioblastoma, with the differential clinical outcome, tumors’ spatial distribution, radiological

measures of cell-density, vascularization, infiltration and extent of the tumor and underlying molecular characteristics, including

IDH1, MGMT, EGFRvIII and transcriptomic subtype composition. The hazard ratio using a Cox proportional hazard model was

3.74 (95% CI:3.01-4.65) among subtypes. The combination of subtype information with IDH1 status provided superior survival

prediction accuracy (c-index=0.75) than that by IDH1 status alone (c-index=0.56), thereby highlighting the synergistic consideration

of molecular and imaging measures for prognostication. The discovered subtypes and their clinical and molecular correlates provide

an in vivo portrait of informative phenotypic heterogeneity in glioblastoma and may potentially assist in precision diagnostics,

homogeneous patient selection into clinical trials and tailoring therapeutic options based on patient’s subtype. Further, the imaging

characteristics suggest that subtype-specific treatment of peritumoral infiltrated tissue might be more effective than current uniform

standard-of-care.

saima.rathore@uphs.upenn.edu

J Comput Sci Syst Biol 2018, Volume: 11

DOI: 10.4172/0974-7230-C1-021