Previous Page  8 / 18 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 18 Next Page
Page Background

Page 48

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 6

Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health

Endodontics & Orthodontics 2018

August 17-18, 2018

AUGUST 17-18, 2018 TOKYO, JAPAN

ANNUAL CONGRESS ON

Endodontics, Orthodontics,

Prosthodontics and Dental Implants

All-on-4 concept vs. traditional implant placement methods with 25 years’ experience and over 28,000

dental implants placed

Attila Kaman

University of Münster, Germany

Statement of the Problem:

The purpose of this lecture is to examine the incidence rate of early and late failure of dental

implants and associated prosthetic problems with reference to a total number of 28,000 implants placed during 1992-2018 in

patients requiring partial and full-arch rehabilitation.

Methodology:

We have compared the nowadays popular and cost-effective all-on-4, all-on-6 rehabilitation solution with 8-10

implants placed in the maxilla and 6-8 in the mandible.

Result:

Following the adaptation of various dental implant systems, our retrospective study shows that the rate of late implant

failure and the associated prosthetic problems were lower in case of increased number of implants. We suggested that the result

is due to the balanced distribution of the functional load on the implant and bone, the improved stress distribution against the

opening force of the mandible and the overload of posterior implants.

Conclusion & Significance:

The benefits of the all-on-4 and all-on-6 rehabilitation solution includes that (sometimes risky)

bone grafting in the posterior mandible can be avoided, furthermore, the increased inter implant distance ensures improved

blood supply. However, excessive overloading of the implants may lead to screw fracture, prosthetic fracture and bone loss. In

case of unexpected complications, the increased number of patient visits make the cost-effective all-on-4, all-on-6 treatment

concept a subject to controversy. When comparing the risks and complications of the all-on-4, all-on-6 rehabilitation solution

with posterior mandibular bone grafting procedures, we can find similar results.

pa.drkaman@implantcenter.hu

J Oral Hyg Health 2018, Volume 6

DOI: 10.4172/2332-0702-C1-009