Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  55 / 89 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 55 / 89 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 6, Issue 6(Suppl)

J Clin Toxicol 2016

ISSN: 2161-0495, JCT an open access journal

Page 96

Notes:

Euro Toxicology 2016

October 24-26, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology

October 24-26, 2016 Rome, Italy

7

th

Euro-Global Summit on

Effect of soy bean on histomorphometric parameters of stomach and biochemical factors of blood

serum in animal model

Simin Fazelipour 1

,

Zahra Tootian

2

and

Reyhaneh Hooshmand Abasi

2

1

Islamic Azad University, Iran

2

University of Tehran, Iran

Introduction & Objective

: In the modern world, soy bean as a valuable meal is used for providing protein and some essential

body needs. The stomach also as a part of alimentary canal has its own role in mechanical and chemical digestion. The objective

of this study is evaluation of the effects of soy meal on histological and histometrical features of the stomach and also on

biochemical factors of blood serum.

Methods

: In this experimental study, a total of thirty immature female mice of

Balb/C were selected at three weeks of age.

Then on the basis of three types of diets, the mice were divided into three groups as; the group A or control, fed on a diet of

full protein, the group B fed on a diet of 40% soy meal and the group C fed on a diet of 20% soy meal. After three months, the

mice were anesthetized, and blood samples were obtained from the heart for determining the serum level of some hematologic

factors such as urea, total protein, cholesterol and LDL. Then the stomach was removed, some tissue sections were prepared

and stained with H

&

E. After histological study, the stomach was subjected to histometric evaluation. The histometric data were

surveyed by a light microscope equipped with Axiovision software and the thickness of mucosa, submucosa, musculature, also

depth of the pits and the number of parietal cells were measured. For data analysis, one way ANOVA was used to compare the

control group with experimental groups and Tukey test was used to compare the groups with each other. The significance level

was considered as P<0.05

Findings

: Soya bean consumption didn

t cause histological

changes.In

the more precisely histometric study, the results showed

that in non glandular portion of the stomach, between the control group compared with the groups fed on soy meal, there

was significant increase in thickness of mucosa in the experimental group B (676±99.45) compared with the control group

(427±77.53) and also in thickness the muscular layers in the experimental group C

)

233.30±84.69)

compared with the control

group (104.05±11.71), (P<0.05). In the glandular portion also significant increase in thickness of mucosa in the experimental

group B (1041.36±167.02) and C (1331.73±143.32)

compared with the control group (615.29±83.14), in depth of pits in the

experimental group B

134.53±14.60) and C (154.29±20.25) compared with the control group (94.79±12.93), in parietal cells

in the experimental group B (15.66±4.45) and C (30.50±13.61) compared with the control group (9.83±1.47) and muscular

layers in the experimental group B

211.59±53.68) and C

(195.72±67.89) compared with the control group (155.73±28.23) was

observed (P<0.05). However a significant decrease in serum level of cholesterol in the experimental group B (87.76±20.53) andC

(83.03±16.06) compared with the control (117.70±20.71), serum level of urea in the experimental group B (36.23±10.43) and C

(40.58±12.14) compared with the control group (65.33±7.28) and also LDL value in the experimental group B (5581.6±470.90)

and C (5689.1±479.79) compared with the control group (6907.1±37.64) was observed (P<0.05)

.

Conclusion

: It seems that long term consumption of soy bean could affect on the stomach mucosa and proliferation of parietal

cells and also could decrease the serum levels of cholesterol, urea and LDL.

simin_fazelipour@yahoo.com Simin Fazelipour

et al., J Clin Toxicol 2016, 6:6(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.C1.021