Previous Page  9 / 9
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 9
Page Background

Volume 8, Issue 5 (Suppl)

J Clin Exp Cardiolog

ISSN: 2155-9880 JCEC, an open access journal

Page 73

Notes:

conference

series

.com

May 22- 24, 2017 Osaka, Japan

World Heart Congress

Heart Congress 2017

May 22- 24, 2017

The Importance of Multidisciplinary Approach to Heart Failure

I

n most countries worldwide, the number of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) is growing, with 1–3% of the adult

population suffering from this syndrome, rising to about 10% in the very elderly. In the near future a large part of the

worldwide population will suffer from heart failure and society will be faced with the consequences. On average one in five

patients is readmitted within 12 months, making heart failure one of the most common causes of hospitalization in people

over 65 years of age. A multidisciplinary team approach involving several professionals with their own expertise is important

in attaining an optimal effect. Physicians, nurses, and other health care professionals are key to ensuring the delivery of

evidence based care. Markers of clinical (in) stability, psychosocial risk factors, and issues related to patient mobility might

be important indicators to determine which inter-professional service might be most effective for which patient. Current HF

guidelines recommend that HF patients are enrolled in a multidisciplinary-care management program to reduce the risk of HF

hospitalization. A multidisciplinary approach to HF may reduce costs,decrease length of stay, curtail readmissions, improve

compliance, and reduce mortality. An important limitation, however, is the substantial heterogeneity in both the terms of the

models of care and the interventions offered, including: clinic or community-based systems of care, remote management, and

enhanced patient self-care.Conventional trials that randomize individual patients may not be the best way to test the effect of a

service; novel approaches, such as the cluster randomized controlled trial, may be

superior.It

is unlikely that any one approach

is optimal. The best form of care might seek to compensate for the weaknesses of each approach by exploiting their strengths.

A strong HF cardiology lead, supported by primary care physicians, nurse specialists, and pharmacists in the hospital and

community with the ability to offer patients remote support might offer the best service.Key to the success of multidisciplinary

HF programs may be the coordination of care along the spectrum of severity of HF and throughout the chain-of-care

delivered by the various services within the healthcare system. Further research is warranted to identify the most efficacious

multidisciplinary approaches to HF.

Biography

Samer Ellahham has served as Chief Quality Officer for SKMC since 2009. In his role, Dr. Ellahham has led the development of a quality and safety program that has been

highly successful and visible and has been recognized internationally by a number of awards. As Chief Quality Officer and Global Leader, Dr. Ellahham has a focus on en-

suring that that implementation of this best practices leads to breakthrough improvements in clinical quality and patient safety. Ellahham is the recipient of the Quality Lead-

ership Award from the Global Awards for excellence in Quality and Leadership and the Business Leadership Excellence Award from the World Leadership Congress. He

was nominated in 2015 for SafeCare magazine Person of the Year. Ellahham is Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality (CPHQ). He is a recognized leader in quality,

safety, and the use of robust performance improvement in improving healthcare delivery. He serves on a number of US and international committees and advisory bodies.

Samerellahham@yahoo.com

Samer Ellahham

Senior Cardiovascular Consultant, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Cleveland Clinic, UAE

Samer Ellahham, J Clin Exp Cardiolog 2017, 8:5 (Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880-C1-067