Previous Page  14 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

Page 52

Notes:

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 9

J Clin Exp Ophthalmol, an open access journal

ISSN: 2155-9570

Ophthalmology Summit 2018

February 26-27, 2018

February 26-27, 2018 | Berlin, Germany

19

th

Global Ophthalmology Summit

Silicone orbital and/or facial prosthesis

Soung Min Kim, Mi Young Eo, Yun Ju Cho, T Hoang Truc Nguyen

and

Ik Jae Kwon

Seoul National University, South Korea

T

he loss of an eye and the associated facial disharmony has major physical, psychological and social consequences for

patients undergoing orbital exenteration. Facial composite defects, including those of the eyes, nose, lips, and buccal cheeks,

occur mainly because of malignant disease, severe trauma, uncontrolled infection, and animal-bite wounds. In satisfying

patient’s aesthetic, functional and psychologic desires, many challenges have been reported, including during microvascular

flap surgical interventions and in resin-based facial prosthesis fabrication. A magnet-retained prosthesis with an implant has

various advantages over both adhesive and spectacle-retained prostheses for reconstruction of the exenterated orbit. Silicone

has appropriate physical properties for maxillofacial prosthesis, such as a skin-like texture and being comfortably lightweight,

although it has weak edge strength. However, silicone facial prostheses face cementation or adhesion difficulty between the

silicone and resin or metal component. The plastic clay used in this report is an exfoliated and intercalated polyurethane

organoclay composite that has been used as a raw material for sculpture and the plastic arts. This plastic clay also has a self-

decontaminating surface that prevents the outgrowth of pathogenic microorganisms on its surfaces, and this antimicrobial

functionality was also approved in recent related articles. This study demonstrates one representative silicone facial prosthesis

case with magnet cementation to silicone using plastic clay, which will be applied to various maxillofacial prosthesis strategies

in the near future.

Recent Publications

1. Kim S M, Cho Y J, Eo M Y, Kim J S, Lee S K (2017) Silicone facial prosthesia: a preliminary report on silicone adhesion

to magnet. J Craniofac. Surg. 29(1):e6-e8.

2. Kim S M, Amponsah E K, Eo M Y, Cho Y J, Lee S K (2017) Pediatric glial heterotopia in the medial canthus. J.

Craniofac. Surg. 28(8):e778-e781.

3. Kim S M (2017) Magnet-retained orbital prosthesis using a dental implant. J Craniofac. Surg. 28(2):e151-e152.

4. Kim S M (2017) The removal of an implant beneath the optic canal by modified endoscopic-assisted sinus surgery. Eur.

Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 274(2):1167-1171.

Biography

Oral and Maxillofacial Microvascular Reconstruction Lab, Brong Ahafo Regional Hospital, Sunyani, Ghana Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental

Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul. South Korea

smin5@snu.ac.kr

Soung Min Kim et al., J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018, Volume 9

DOI: 10.4172/2155-9570-C1-078