Previous Page  13 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

Page 52

Notes:

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 3

Optometry: Open Access

ISSN: 2476-2075

Optometry 2018

October 08-09, 2018

October 08-09, 2018 | Edinburgh, Scotland

3

rd

International Conference and Expo on

Optometry & Vision Science

Comparison of the Snellen acuity chart with the spectrum eye care software LogMAR chart amongst

children of school going age

Thokozile Ingrid Metsing

University of Johannesburg, South Africa

M

ost vision screening protocols worldwide rely on the measurement of visual acuities (VAs) to detect visual anomalies

amongst children of school-going age. This is despite the fundamental design flaws in the Snellen chart. However, there

appears to be a growing demand for the usage of modern technology in the eyecare profession. The aim of this prospective

and quantitative study was to evaluate the equivalence of a standard Snellen chart compared to the Spectrum Eyecare Software

LogMAR chart in evaluating VAs amongst children of school going age. Normative data was collected from three randomly

selected schools in Johannesburg (South Africa) on the non-clinical population of 209 children of school-going age mean

10.13±2.45 years. Monocular and binocular VAs was measured using the Snellen chart at six meters and the spectrum computer

software program at three meters. The statistical significant differences (p<0.05) were determined using ANOVA for distance

binocular and monocular VAs using the Snellen chart and the Spectrum Eyecare Software. The performance of the Spectrum

Software LogMAR was found to be one line better than that of the Snellen chart. However, the Snellen chart still remains the

simple, easily accessible and inexpensive method to be used for vision screening amongst children of school-going age compared

to the Spectrum Eyecare Software.

Recent Publications:

1. Perera C, Chakrabarti R, Islam F MA and Crowston J (2015) The eye phone studies: reliability and accuracy of assessing

Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology. Eye (London, England) 29 (7): 888-894.

2. Lodha V S (2015) Comparison of visual acuity measurement by smartphone based application vs. conventional Snellen

visual acuity chart. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicines and Dental Care 2(6): 39-41.

3. Gounder P A, Cole E, Colley S, Hille D M (2014) Validation of a portable electronic visual acuity system. Journal of

Manufacturing Technology Management 3 (2): 35-39.

4. Zhang Z T, Zhang S C, Huang X G, et al. (2013) A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual

acuity testing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 19 (1): 55-59.

5. Trivedi R H, Wilson M E, Peterseim M M, Cole K B and Teed R G W (2010) A pilot study evaluating the use of EyeSpy

video game software to perform vision screening in school-aged children. Journal of AAPOS 14.

Biography

Thokozile Ingrid Metsing is currently a Lecturer at the University of Johannesburg. This article is part of the research conducted by her towards her DPhil study, entitled:

“Strategies to improve school vision screenings at primary health care level in Johannesburg, South Africa”. She has published six articles with three of them currently

under review from the

African Vision and Eye Health and Ophthalmology Clinics and Visual Sciences

journals.

Thokozile Ingrid Metsing, Optom open access 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.4172/2476-2075-C1-008