alexa A Practical Heuristic for Dialogical Argument-Making in
ISSN: 2155-9627

Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics
Open Access

Like us on:
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations

700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Short Communication

A Practical Heuristic for Dialogical Argument-Making in Applied Ethics

Rehg W*

Department of Philosophy, Saint Louis University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Rehg W
Department of Philosophy
Saint Louis University
3800 Lindell Blvd
St. Louis MO 63108, USA
Tel: 314-977-3827
FAX: 314-977-3696
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 28, 2015 Accepted date: January 28, 2016 Published date: January 29, 2015

Citation: Rehg W (2016) A Practical Heuristic for Dialogical Argument-Making in Applied Ethics. J Clin Res Bioeth 7:260. doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000260

Copyright: © 2016 Rehg W. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Abstract

This short communication sets forth a modification of Habermas’s discourse ethics, designed to render the dialogical features of discourse ethics practically feasible in contexts that do not have the institutional resources for organizing actual discourses inclusive of all stakeholders. After briefly sketching an interpretation of Habermas’s principle of dialogical universalization, I set forth a practical heuristic that recasts discourse-ethical idealizations as feasible research tasks of two sorts: dialogical argument-construction and public-merits assessment. The communication closes with a short consideration of the challenge that value conflicts pose for discourse bioethics.

Keywords

Share This Page

Additional Info

Loading
Loading Please wait..
 
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords