Previous Page  16 / 19 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 19 Next Page
Page Background

Page 39

Notes:

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8

Gynecology & Obstetrics

Gynecology Congress 2018

August 22-23, 2018

August 22-23, 2018 Tokyo, Japan

5

th

Asia Pacific

Gynecology and Obstetrics Congress

Sujoy Dasgupta, Gynecol Obstet 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0932-C3-030

Adherence to WHO 2010 recommendations with regard to semen analysis reports in the laboratories

of West Bengal

Sujoy Dasgupta

Genome - The Fertility Centre, India

Statement of the Problem:

Semen analysis is an integral part of evaluation of a sub-fertile male. Because a semen result reflects

the genital tract health of a man three months prior to collection, there is risk of significant day to day variation. Additionally,

the results vary from one laboratory to another. In 2010, the WHO published recommendations on standard reporting of

semen analysis. A number of Western studies found the lack of uniformity among the laboratories in assessing and reporting

semen samples. Our study looked into the adherence of reporting of semen analysis with the WHO 2010 guidelines.

Methodology:

An observational study has been carried out after collecting semen analysis reports from different parts of

Eastern India and Bangladesh. The sources of the reports included individual patients presented to subfertility clinics and

gynecologists, reports sent by the patients online to their treating doctors and directly from the laboratory. The reports were

subsequently analyzed against the standard of semen sample reporting recommended by the WHO, 2010.

Findings:

Majority of the laboratories did not follow all the standard points laid down by the WHO. Although all of the

laboratories mentioned sperm concentration and morphology, majority of them did not report motility properly. Regarding

physical characteristics, there have been discrepancies in reporting pH and viscosity. Very few laboratories used reference

values, and among those who the values, large portions were still not using the WHO 2010 criteria. However, most of the

laboratories attached to the ART (Assisted Reproductive Technology) clinics performed better in terms of reporting than non-

ART laboratories.

Conclusion& Significance:

Evenmore than seven years after publication of WHO 2010 guidelines for semen analysis, majority

of the laboratories do not adhere to the all the recommendations. There is need for increased awareness for the laboratory

persons in this regard.

Biography

Sujoy Dasgupta is currently working as a Consultant in Reproductive Medicine & Surgery at Genome - The Fertility Centre, Kolkata, India. He has his expertise

in evaluation and passion in improving the fertility treatment and reproductive health. He has presented papers and posters in various national and international

conferences. He has been invited to deliver lectures in more than 40 conferences at regional, national and international levels. He has, to his credit, 15 research

publications at national and international journals and chapter contributions in three text books. He takes keen interest in medical education, particularly for trainee

doctors. He has also been involved in “MRCOG Orientation Program” for training the doctors aspiring for MRCOG. His area of interest includes male subfertility,

recurrent pregnancy loss, low cost IVF and fertility treatment in sexual dysfunction.

sujoy.d@neotiahealthcare.com dr.sujoydasgupta@gmail.com