Previous Page  9 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

Page 61

conferenceseries

.com

February 20-21, 2017 Berlin, Germany

9

th

International Congress on

Nutrition & Health

Volume 7 Issue 1 (Suppl)

J Nutr Food Sci

ISSN:2155-9600 JNFS, an open access journal

Nutrition & Health 2017

February 20-21, 2017 Berlin, Germany

J Nutr Food Sci 2017, 7:1 (Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.C1.039

Obesity, insulin resistance and gene variation in multi-ethnic Malaysian adults

Mitra S R

1

, Tan P Y

1

and Farahnaz Amini

2

1

University of Nottingham, Malaysia

2

UCSI University, Malaysia

I

n order to tackle obesity-related non-communicable diseases, we aimed to evaluate and explore interaction between anthropometric

indices, blood biochemical parameters, dietary intake and selected gene polymorphisms in apparently healthy Malaysians of three

ethnic groups. Malaysian adults (Malaysian Malays, Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indians) with BMI>23 from communities

living in Selangor are our participants. Our results reveal, mean age (±SD) is 43.0y (±10.1) for women (n=93) and 41.0y (±13.5) for

male (n=20) participants. Average BMI on the combined data is 29.7kg/m2 (±5.1), significantly higher (P=0.01) than 23 kg/m2 which

is the current cut off for categorization as ‘overweight’ for South East Asian individuals. Mean fat mass for females is 33.9 kg (±1.1)

and for the male is 31.3 kg (±17.6). Mean body fat percentage is 42.7% (±5.3) for females (normal range: 18~28) and 34.2% (±7.8)

for the male (normal range: 10~20). Mean waist circumference is 92.1 cm (±12.2) for females (normal: 80) and 106.5 cm (±14.9) for

the male (normal: 90). Indians have significantly lower HDL cholesterol (p=0.001), higher fasting insulin (p=0.002) and HOMA-IR

(p=0.001) (1.3±0.3 mmol/L, 14.3±13.3 uU/ml and 1.8±1.5) compared to Malays (1.7±0.5 mmol/L, 7.0±5.20 uU/ml and 0.9±0.6)

and Chinese (1.6±0.4 mmol/L, 7.9±5.2 uU/ml and 1.0±0.6), respectively. There is ethnicity difference on the effect of FTO gene

variants as below. Indians carrying GG genotype of FTO rs9930501 were compromised when compared to GA and AA genotypes

respectively, with respect to fasting glucose (6.4±2.2 mmol/L against 4.7±0.1mmol/L and 5.0±0.6mmol/L, p=0.016) and HOMA-IR

(2.3±1.6 against 2.0±1.7 and 10±0.5, p=0.018), BMI (34.6±13.1 kg/m

2

against 26.7±3.6 kg/m

2

and 28.8±4.3 kg/m

2

, p=0.052) and

body weight (97.6±52.6 kg against 66.6±10.0 kg and 76.6±15.2 kg/m

2

, p=0.034). Whereas the Chinese carrying GA genotype were

compromised with respect to body weight (72.1±4.3 kg against 109.1 kg), BMI (27.8±10.8 kg/m

2

against 37.3 kg/m

2

), WC (82.9±1.8

cm against 121.0 cm) and serum leptin level (7.0±1.6 ng/ml against 17.8 ng/ml) when compared to AA genotype. A diet and exercise

intervention is ongoing in the above population.

soma.mitra@nottingham.edu.my

Dietary guidelines for Indians: Need for its revision and importance in public health

D Raghunatha Rao

National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), India

D

ietary guidelines (DGs) play a very important role in guiding the population to adopt healthy life style practices at the individual

level. In India, National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) is the nodal agency for promoting these dietary guidelines at the community

level. The first dietary guidelines were formulated in the year 1998 by NIN and translated in to different languages to promote at the

population level. After a decade, a committee was constituted for the revision of these dietary guidelines taking into consideration of

change in the dietary habits of the population, influence of western food chains in Indian market, lack of physical activity among the

people and growing trends in non communicable diseases at the population level. Further, DGs emphasize promotion of community

health and prevention of non communicable and other diseases. Special focus on the importance of nutrition was emphasized for

vulnerable segment of the population such as infants, children and adolescents, pregnant and lactating women and the elderly. The

presentation mainly focuses on the need for the revision of the dietary guidelines and key differences in the new guidelines with

doable and practical solutions under the “points to ponder” mentioned in the revised dietary guidelines. Further, the presentation

also provides insight into different communication strategies to be applied at the community level in order to encourage people to

follow the dietary guidelines.

drr_rao@yahool.com