Previous Page  8 / 8
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 8
Page Background

Page 50

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 2, Issue 2 (Suppl)

Optom open access

ISSN: 2476-2075 OMOA, an open access journal

Ophthalmologists 2017

September 25-26, 2017

September 25-26, 2017 Dubai, UAE

11

th

Global

Ophthalmologists Annual Meeting

Assessment of intraocular pressure using ocular response analyzer and Goldman applanation

tonometry before and after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)

Wassef Amr

Cairo University, Egypt

Purpose:

To compare the obtainability and values of IOP measurements by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) and

Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) before and after Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) testing the degree of their agreement and

the impact of corneal biomechanical factors on IOP measurement.

Patients & Methods:

The study is a comparative prospective study in which patients scheduled for PKP undergo intraocular

pressure measurement (IOP) using the ORA then the GAT one day before surgery to be repeated one month after their surgery.

Results:

Forty patients undergoing PKP were enrolled in the study, 28 males (70%) and 12 females (30%). The mean age of

patients involved is 42.8±15.4, ranging between 9 and 75 years. Obtainability of ORA (92.5% of the patients) was significantly

higher than GAT (60%) postoperatively (p<0.001), while no significant difference was elicited preoperatively. The mean cornea

corrected IOP (IOPcc) was significantly higher than GAT and Goldmann related IOP (IOPg) both pre and postoperatively.

In addition, both mean IOPcc and GAT postoperatively (19.2±8.31, 15.65±6.99 mmhg, respectively) were significantly higher

than their preoperative values (14.44±7.03, 11.78±4.55 mmhg respectively). Strong correlations existed between GAT and

ORA measurements both pre and postoperatively. The level of agreement between GAT and IOPg was higher than IOPcc.

Conclusion:

ORA have proven to be superior to GAT in the ability to obtain reliable IOP measurements post PKP. IOPcc

measurements also proved to be relevant, independent on corneal biomechanical factors (CH and CRF) but judging the

accuracy of its values needs further large scale studies.

Biography

Wassef Amr is an Ophthalmologist, completed his MSc in Ophthalmology from Cairo University, Egypt. Presently, he is working as an Ophthalmology Resident in

Kasr Alainy Medical School, Cairo University with special interest in cornea.

amr.m.alazeez@interns.kasralaliny.edu.eg

Wassef Amr, Optom open access 2017, 2:2 (Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2476-2075-C1-006