Previous Page  19 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

Page 63

conferenceseries

.com

May 01-02, 2017 Toronto, Canada

2

nd

International Conference on

Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics

Volume 5, Issue 1 (Suppl)

J Oral Hyg Health

ISSN: 2332-0702 JOHH, an open access journal

Restorative Dentistry & Prosthodontics 2017

May 01-02, 2017

J Oral Hyg Health 2017, 5:1 (Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2332-0702-C1-006

Comparison of dimensional accuracy of conventionally and digitally manufactured intra-coronal

restorations

Leila Nasiry Khanlar

and

Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Purpose:

This study sought to compare the dimensional accuracy of intra-coronal restorations fabricated using digital and

conventional techniques.

Materials & Methods:

A sound mandibular molar tooth received standard onlay preparation. In group A, the onlays were made

after conventional impression and conventional fabrication of resin pattern. In group E, the onlays were made after conventional

impression and 3D printing of pattern. In group O, the onlays were made after intraoral scanning by Trios (3 Shape) and the resin

pattern was produced by 3D printing. Ten specimens were in each group and totally 30 specimens were evaluated. Glass ceramic

restorations (e.max Press, Ivoclar) were fabricated using the press technique. The replica technique was used to assess the marginal fit.

Each replica was assessed in eight points. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the marginal gap among the three groups. Tukey’s

HSD test was applied for pairwise comparisons of the groups. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

No significant difference was noted in the marginal gap at the gingival margin among the three groups (P=0.342), but

significant differences were noted among the three groups in the pulpal (P=0.025) and buccal (P=0.0031) areas. Comparison of the

absolute gap among the three groups revealed that only groups A and E were significantly different (P=0.020).

Conclusions:

Within the limitations of this study, it appears that restorations fabricated with the three techniques have dimensional

accuracy within the clinically acceptable range. However, the conventional method yielded more accurate results.

lana1354@yahoo.com