Previous Page  17 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

Page 43

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 4

Journal of Community & Public Health Nursing

Nursing Summit 2018

November 08-09, 2018

November 08-09, 2018 Sydney, Australia

25

th

World Congress on

Nursing & Healthcare

SeRUN® study: Development of running profiles using a mixed methods analysis

Manuela Besomi

1, 2

, Jaime Leppe

1

, Maria Cristina Di Silvestre

1

and Jenny Setchell

2

1

Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile

2

University of Queensland, Australia

Aim:

The study aims to determine profiles of urban runners based on socio-demographic, health, motivational, training

characteristics and running-related beliefs and behaviors.

Method:

Mixed, exploratory, sequential study with two stages: Quantitative, using an online survey and Qualitative, using

semi-structured interviews with runners from the previous stage. Participants were recruited via running routes commonly

attended by runners, eight races, previous databases and social media networks. The survey collected information on six

dimensions: Socio-demographic, health, motivations, training characteristics, running-related behavior and beliefs and

perceptions about health. Profiles were identified using a two-step hierarchical clustering analysis. Subsequently, 15 interviews

were conducted with participating runners across each of the identified profiles. Qualitative analysis complemented the profiles

characterization, explaining motivations to start and continue running, beliefs about risk factors and injury prevention, and

the physical therapist’s role in rehabilitation. Statistical analysis from stage one was conducted using SPSS 22 with a confidence

level of 5%. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic and content analyses.

Results&Conclusion:

A total of 821 surveyswere analyzed (46%female),mean aged 36.6±10.0 years. Cluster analysis delineated

four profiles (n=752) according to years of running experience, weekly running volume and hours of weekly training. Profiles

were named Beginner (n=163) Basic (n=164) Middle (n=160) and Advanced (n=265). Profiles were statistically different

according to sex, age, years of running experience, training characteristics, previous injuries and use of technological devices

(p<0.05). There were identified motivations to start and continue running. Beliefs about risk factors vary among stretching,

footwear, training surface and overload. Runners identified the physical therapist as a specialist, involved in the rehabilitation

process and showing empathy towards the patient. These findings might need to be considered when developing preventive

and educational strategies for running injuries.

m.besomimolina@uq.edu.au

J Comm Pub Health Nurs 2018, Volume 4

DOI: 10.4172/2471-9846-C3-009