Previous Page  3 / 25 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 25 Next Page
Page Background

Page 36

Notes:

Surgery: Current Research | ISSN: 2161-1076 | Volume 8

August 31-September 01, 2018 | Toronto, Canada

Plastic & Cosmetic Surgery

International Conference on

Dermatopathology & Skin Care

International Conference & Expo on

&

Functional outcome and complications of robot-assisted free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction

Chih-Sheng Lai, I-Chen Chen, Shih-An Liu ,Yen-Wei Chen, Chen-Te Lu

and

Jung-Hsing Yen

Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of robotic-assisted oropharyngeal reconstruction comparison

with conventional free flap reconstruction. The robotic surgical system provides a clear, magnified, 3-dimensional (3D) view

as well as a precise and stable instrumental movement, which minimizes many technical difficulties that may be encountered

in the surgical treatment of oropharyngeal tumors.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent reconstructive operations using

free radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap for oropharyngeal defects over a 20-month period (May 2013 to December 2014).

The primary predictor variable was method of reconstruction (conventional versus robot-assisted). Outcome measures were

postoperative complication rates, revision rates, and postoperative functional outcomes.

Results:

The study sample consisted of 47 subjects who underwent reconstructive operations using free radial forearm

fasciocutaneous flap for oropharyngeal defects (33 conventional and 14 robot-assisted reconstructions). Complication

rates between the conventional and robot-assisted groups were similar for flap failure, partial necrosis, wound infections,

hematoma or seroma formation, wound dehiscence, and fistula formation. The revision requiring additional operation was

comparable between the two cohorts. The functional outcomes postoperatively of robot-assisted reconstructions are better

than conventional reconstructions as demonstrated by the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale scores.

Conclusion:

There is no significant difference in complication and revision rates between conventional versus robot-assisted

oropharyngeal reconstructions. The application of a robotic surgical system seems to be a safe option with better oral function

postoperatively in the free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects without lip or mandible splitting.

Biography

He is an attending plastic surgeon at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. He has more than 10 years of experience as plastic surgeon and specializes in

wound treatment and reconstructive surgery. He obtained medical degree from Chung Shan Medical University. He has also authored many research publications

and is an active member of many surgery societies as Taiwan Society of Plastic Surgery, Member of Taiwan Society for Surgery of the Hand, Member of Taiwan

Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery.

o1978626@pchome.com.tw

Chih-Sheng Lai et al., Surgery Curr Res 2018, Volume 8

DOI: 10.4172/2161-1076-C4-044