Previous Page  8 / 13 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 13 Next Page
Page Background

Page 66

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 7

Journal of Geology & Geophysics

ISSN: 2381-8719

Soil Science 2018

October 22-23, 2018

October 22-23, 2018 | Berlin, Germany

2

nd

Annual Congress on

Soil and Water Sciences

Determination of watershed infiltration, runoff and erosion parameters: Turbulent or laminar

flows?

Mark E Grismer

UC Davis, USA

K

ey to modeling watershed runoff and erosion processes is estimation of infiltration/runoff rates or effective hydraulic

conductivities (Km) and erosion rates, as they vary with soil cover/tilth/slope conditions, and seasonally with changing

water contents. Portable rainfall simulators (RSs) are powerful tools for measuring infiltration, runoff and erosion under a

variety of field conditions, and information from RS test plots can provide the infiltration/runoff parameterization required

for watershed modeling. We apply a simultaneous solution of the time-to-ponding/runoff and Green–Ampt type infiltration

equations to determine Km and compare these values with the simpler calculation of Km as the difference between steady

rainfall and runoff rates. We also develop a laminar flow-based description of stream power to determine erodibilities and then

apply both analyses to data from 423 RS plots across the Lake Tahoe Basin. For all practical purposes, calculation of Km from

the steady rainfall and runoff rates was equivalent to that estimated from infiltration equations. When developing comparable

“erodibilities”, defined as the ratio of sediment detachment rates to stream power, the laminar-flow derived stream power

results in a better fit between detachment rate and stream power than that derived from turbulent flow assumptions; thereby

eliminating the restriction to <10% slopes and need to define ‘n’ associated with the Mannings equation. Applying the laminar

flow stream power derivation to the determination of erodibilities enabled comparison of data from RS test plots having a

wide range of slopes and runoff rates, as well as from RSs deploying different rainfall energies. Our overall goal is to develop a

common assessment method, or approach, to evaluate field RS plot data for use in watershed modeling efforts.

megrismer@ucdavis.edu

J Geol Geophys 2018, Volume 7

DOI: 10.4172/2381-8719-C2-021