Previous Page  27 / 34 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

Page 103

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 6

Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology

ISSN: 2329-9029

Plant Science 2018

October 29-30, 2018

October 29-30, 2018 | Valencia, Spain

6

th

Global Summit on Plant Science

J Plant Biochem Physiol 2018, Volume 6

DOI: 10.4172/2329-9029-C1-003

Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability of arabica coffee (

Coffea arabica

L.) genotypes

Lemi Beksisa

1, 2

, Ashenafi Ayano

1

and

Sentayew Alamerew

2

1

Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia

2

College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine-Jimma University, Ethiopia

L

ack of suitable varieties that exhibit stable yield performances across wide ranges of environments because of significant

Genotype x Environment Interaction (GEI) is the major factor among several production constraints contributing to low

productivity of Arabica coffee in Ethiopia. In the present study, eleven advanced Limmu coffee genotypes were evaluated in

eight environments (four locations over two years) to determine the existence of GEI and yield stability performances. The

experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design of two replications under all locations. Combined analysis of

variance showed a highly significant effect of genotype by environment interaction indicating the differential yield response of

genotypes across different environments. The major proportion of the variation explained by environments was 42.74% of the

total variation. Nevertheless, the contribution of the genotypes to the total variance was much smaller than the environments

and the genotype by environment interactions. This suggests that environmental variation, among other variance components

was the major factor affecting the yield performance of coffee genotypes. To this effect, different stability models such as Additive

Main effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI), AMMI stability value, cultivar superiority index and yield stability index

were used for the stability analysis. The first two Interaction Principal Component axis (IPCAs) of AMMI exhibited a highly

significant effect and cumulatively contributed about 63.21% of the total interaction sum of squares which was greater than half

of the total. This indicated the capability of the first two principal component axis for cross-validated variation explained by the

interaction effect. Subsequently, the two high yielding genotypes, namely; G3 (L52/2001) and G9 (L55/2001), on an average,

showed stable performance across environments and on the other hand, the study also illustrated the presence of location specific

high yielding coffee genotype such as L56/2001 as a result of significant interaction of the genotypes with the environments.

Regarding to test environments, Gera 2015/16 (E5) regarded as a more stable site for coffee bean yield improvement over the

rest environments due to the IPCA score nearer to zero which is having little interaction effect, while Agaro 2015/16 (E7)

was considered to be the most interactive environment. Based on the result of this study, coffee breeders or farmers would be

recommended for wisely selecting either for location specific or wider adaptable coffee genotypes leading to substantial yield

increment under Limmu coffee growing areas.

lbeksisa@gmail.com