Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 46 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 46 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 7, Issue 6(Suppl)

J Chromatogr Sep Tech

ISSN: 2157-7064 JCGST, an open access journal

Page 36

Notes:

Separation Techniques 2016

September 26-28, 2016

conferenceseries

.com

Separation Techniques

September 26-28, 2016 Valencia, Spain

2

nd

International Conference and Expo on

Protonic ceramic membranes under asymmetric steam atmosphere

Sandrine Ricote

1

, Anthony Manerbino

2

and

W Grover Coors

3

1

Colorado School of Mines, USA

2

Solid State Energy, USA

3

Protonetics, USA

A

comprehensive analysis of proton transport in protonic ceramic membrane devices is presented. Thin, dense membranes

of BaZr0.8Ce0.1Y0.1O3-d, BZCY81, may now be fabricated with relative ease at commercial scale. These devices have

potential for supporting the emerging hydrogen economy and reducing dependence of fossil fuels. With protonic ceramic

electrolytes it is possible to galvanically transport pure hydrogen from one side of a membrane to the other, making it

possible to fabricate electrochemical devices and systems that were previously impractical or impossible. H

2

can be produced

from natural gas by steam reforming, whereby hydrogen may be extracted from a reacting stream of methane and steam

in a protonic membrane reformer, PMR; Liquid hydrocarbons, such as ethylene and benzene, may be produced from dry

methane in a catalytic membrane reactor by methane dehydroaromatization, MDA, with hydrogen extracted from the feed

gas; Ammonia can be synthesized by pumping hydrogen through the membrane to react with nitrogen in a process called

solid-state ammonia synthesis, SSAS; and H

2

can be produced from water vapor by steam electrolysis in a protonic ceramic

electrolysis cell (PCEC). In order for these devices to become commercially viable, a clear understanding of their operation

in various use environments is necessary. All the devices listed above consume electric power to pump hydrogen across the

membrane, which must be supplied by an external power source. The power consumed is the product of the applied voltage

and the current consumed by the galvanic device, so it is important that the device have low resistance and high faradaic

efficiency with respect to proton transport and that power is not wasted by parasitic losses. The proton current depends on

the effective resistance, which depends on electrode performance, faradaic efficiency and bulk materials properties. Well-

designed electrodes can, in principle, be developed with low effective resistance, but in the final analysis it is the conductivity

of the electrolyte membrane that limits the performance of these devices. The proton conductivity of BZCY81 is only a few

millisiemens per centimeter in reducing atmosphere. More importantly, conductivity in BZCY is a strong function of water

vapor pressure, making the electrolyte a mixed proton/steam conductor. This is an unusual characteristic that is unique to

protonic ceramic electrolytes. The impact depends on the application. For example, MDA requires nominally dry methane on

the feed side, while PMR requires moist atmosphere with steam-to-carbon ratio greater than unity. SSAS, on the other hand

requires dry atmosphere on the permeate side, where nitrogen reacts with hydrogen to produce anhydrous ammonia. Steam

electrolysis is carried out under moist oxidizing conditions on the feed side. In all cases, the desired permeate is hydrogen, as

dry as possible to avoid the need for separation of hydrogen from steam, but as a practical matter, some steam will be present

either due to steam permeation or added to the sweep gas intentionally. The transport properties of the membrane in each of

these devices depend strongly on pH

2

O and pH

2

on the feed and permeate sides. Knowledge of the electrolyte conductivity as

a function of pH

2

O and pH

2

on each side of the membrane is essential for designing cost-effective galvanic systems since this

determines the protonic flux density.

Biography

Sandrine Ricote has obtained her PhD on Ceramic Proton Conductors at the University of Burgundy, France. She has worked four years in the Department of

Energy Conversion and Storage at the Danish Technical University as a Post-doc and then as a Scientist. In 2012, she moved to the Department of Mechanical

Engineering at Colorado School of Mines. She is currently a Research Associate Professor with a main focus on ceramic proton conductors.

sricote@mines.edu

Sandrine Ricote et al., J Chromatogr Sep Tech 2016, 7:6(Suppl)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7064.C1.019