Many research works are published every year related to reconstructive surgery in journals. Peer review process helps to judge the quality of work submitted by the authors related to reconstructive surgery techniques to the Journal of anaplastology, by prominent professionals in reconstructive surgery. Peer review process helps to increase the credibility, performance, quality of the content in the article which in turn helps to judge whether the paper is good enough to be published in the journal. Journal of anaplastology follows the scholarly peer review process in order to evaluate the authorââ¬â¢s research and work in the territory of customized and quality techniques in reconstructive surgery. As per the reviewers and editors comments and suggestions on the manuscript, the authorââ¬â¢s paper could be accepted or rejected or considered for acceptance if the manuscript is revised as per editorââ¬â¢s suggestions. Accepted papers under reconstructive surgery research in a peer review journals like Journal of anaplastology symbolize the best research practices in the area of reconstructive surgery. Peer review process enhances the publisher in filtering scholarly articles. This process inspires the authors to submit their work under reconstructive surgery as per the quality standards. Peer review process aims in eliminating the errors or weaknesses in their presented work or research activity by impartial review process conducted by professional experts in reconstructive surgery
Last date updated on September, 2024