alexa Aquatic Plants Peer Review Journals|OMICS International|Journal Of Aquaculture Research And Development

OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Aquatic Plants Peer Review Journals

The aquaculture research journal publishes the article on fish research, fish genetics, fish production, seedlings of fish, fish hatcheries, spawning, prawn research, shrimp research, aquatic flora, research on aquatic fauna etc. The source of articles in the journal will rate the journal by impact factor. The impact factor of journal provides quantitative assessment tool for grading, evaluating, sorting and comparing journals of similar kind. It reflects the average number of citations to recent articles published in science and social science journals in a particular year or period, and is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field. It is first devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information. The impact factor of a journal is evaluated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. The Aquatic plants grow in shallow deep waters. The different types of aquatic plants are Phytoplanktons, periphytons and macrophytes where the research is in broad spectrum. The researchers who have a huge experience in the corresponding field only can review the manuscripts of the related articles. The Journal of Aquaculture research with good reviewers can extract the good articles to publish in the peer reviewed journal. Peer review refers to the work done during the screening of submitted manuscripts and funding applications. This process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and reduces the dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. Publications that have not undergone peer review are likely to be regarded with suspicion by academic scholars and professionals.
  • Share this page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • Blogger

Last date updated on July, 2014